Some early power rankings...

[JK17]

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6897650

Now, I'm not going to get into debate over whether or not we are ranked properly or not, or who is ranked too high or too low, because bottom line, they are power rankings two months before the season even comes close to starting, so its overlal irrelevant...

What I am concerned with is how somone who thinks Craig Davis and Malcom Floyd will be our #1 and #2 WRs has a job...I thought it was common knowledge VJ was getting the #1 spot, with Parker likely keeping the #2 spot...Floyd is around #4 on our depth chart...does that bother anyone else or is it just me?

[San Diego Chicken]

Honestly, the whole writeup is very vanilla and doesn't give any real insight as to why the teams are ranked the way they are. All you have to do is start at the top with the commentary that "you've got to beat the best to be the best" (referring to the Colts being #1). What type of reasoning is that, especially for an opinion piece? If some other team looks better than Indy on paper, have the stones to say so.

[Average OT LB]

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6897650

Now, I'm not going to get into debate over whether or not we are ranked properly or not, or who is ranked too high or too low, because bottom line, they are power rankings two months before the season even comes close to starting, so its overlal irrelevant...

What I am concerned with is how somone who thinks Craig Davis and Malcom Floyd will be our #1 and #2 WRs has a job...I thought it was common knowledge VJ was getting the #1 spot, with Parker likely keeping the #2 spot...Floyd is around #4 on our depth chart...does that bother anyone else or is it just me?

yeah yeah yeah blah blah blah