PDA

View Full Version : Pre-season Game 1 Discussion


Average OT LB
08-12-2007, 07:20 PM
Looks like Hart started at S, and Floyd started at WR (davis at the three)

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 12:38 AM
Quick Notes from the game: the starters looked vary shaky- not that they arent as talented as last year, but that the communication wasnt there..

I don't know if Marty not being the coach any more but ill tell you guys what, if Marty's team went out and had a bunch of stupid penalties, didnt look focused, organized or motivated.. they would get a good ear full

I'm worried about the team- the talent is there the preperation is not. (the mccree td is a perfect example)

On the positive side, its the first pre season game..

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:07 AM
Okay I'll give a run-down as far as what I can remember, just off the top of my head...

The game started out kind of sloppy, there were some drops, sacks, fumbles, and a whole lot of penalties. That's too be expected of an early game like this, but the penalties really killed us. I'll try to break it down by position, since I'm having trouble remembering specific things, and I didn't write anything down during the game.

Quarterback
Rivers looked pretty good I thought, he threw mostly short passes, but didn't throw any bad passes which was key. He could have gotten rid of the ball a little better on the two sacks, but a lot of that was the fault of the O-Line. It's also important to remember Rivers typically got better as the games went on last year, so him starting out solid was a big thing...Floyd didn't help him with that drop either, though he played probably the best out of all our WRs. Volek didn't look terrible as a backup either, though he has to make sure he holds on to the ball better. On that fumble the defense came straight through, but he's gotta keep two hands on the ball in the pocket. He played real well in the third quarter though, especially with the TD Whitehurst was hard to judge, but he was rather average if not unimpressive...I'd like to see him play with some of the other units, but still, he is only the third string QB, and I wouldn't get too happy or upset with him just yet in his career.

Running Back
Tomlinson Looked great on the sidelines, really made the team look good :-P...Turner looked explosive and ran hard like he usually did, though he only got four carries, so there wasn't much to judge him on. Sproles on the other hand, I thought really made a big statement about himself. He could play a role in this season as well as next, in the draw and screen game. He's a little guy but he sure as hell is quick, and sure runs a lot bigger then he is. He was explosive and powerful, and I think calmed a lot of people's nerves about him, and maybe quieted the speculation on him being cut. I was most impressed with his play on offense. Gross only had the two carries for 12 yards, but he looks like the kind of guy who will work hard. I doubt he makes the team when its all said and done, but there could be a spot on the practice squad for him. Pinnock I'm just not a huge fan of. I don't like him running the ball, and I don't like him blocking. I don't think he made a big statement for himself in this game, but he still has three more chances to do it. He'll make the team, almost by default, in my opinion. Neal I was disapointed that he didn't make that 4th and 1, but as a blocker, he did fine as usual, no complaints.

Wide Receivers
I felt the wide receivers were really up and down this game. Vincent Jackson had the one catch, that was nice, but then fumbled the ball, and got called on holding, although with the way he typically blocks down field I'll take that penalty, although it set us back quite a bit. Overall he needs to play better if he's going to be a number one guy for us this year. Craig Davis had the first catch and looked great on it, but then he fumbled the end-around. The bad news, obviosuly is that he could not handle the ball, but on the bright side, it does look as if they are trying to involve Davis a good deal, and that end around was set up, from what I saw at least, very well. It was an average performance from him on a day where I felt our rookies did well. Floyd had me really mad with that dropped ball, since it would have been a huge conversion on a ball with nice touch by Rivers. He had no excuse to drop that ball, but he did have, proabably, the best game out of all our Wide Receivers. Overall, he looked the best, although he was also targeted much more frequently. Naanee I was very impressed with. I felt all our rookies did well today, but Naanee looked like he's going to make an impact this year, and even had some work with the first team, though he didn't do much with them. He looks like he can be used everywhere, and didn't make any bad plays, and did make a couple good ones. Impressive performance from him. Camarillo and Osgood both looked decent, but played against much weaker players. Osgood will clearly make the team because of special teams, but this might be the year Camarillo is cut. We already have 6 WRs, assuming VJ, Davis, Floyd, Parker, Naanee, and Osgood make it. I feel he's the odd man out.

Tight Ends
Gates was Antonio Gates. No bad plays were made, and he made one really good play. What more did we want from him, I didn't want him in the game that much anyway. Chandler sure looked great though. He could prove to be very useful. If we can line him up at TE this year, and count on him, that lets us split out Gates more often, and could be huge for our passing game. As a receiver, he sure looked great out there, another rookie who did well.

O-Line
I'm not going to go to indepth with them, but I'm going to say they played very average. McNeill flat out missed a block that led to a sack. Hopefully, that is something that we can already eliminate as happening again, and be something we don't have to worry about. I was disapointed in him, as he was so money last year, and didn't come off as strong today. We also didn't pick up a blitz, though in the line's defense, they brought 6 and we blocked with 5...that would be hard to pick up anytime, especially preseason. The push was there, for the most part, on the running plays. But the pass blocking has to improve. Too often Rivers could not step up to throw, and Volek and Whitehurst were hit often.

D-Line
To be honest, I was more focused on the Linebackers and Secondary, so if someone else feels like highlighting them, it would be appreciated. I know Jamal did well, he always does, but unfortunately I did not pay as much attention as I would have liked. Maybe I'll rewatch the game tomorrow, and post more information, but for now, I can't say much about them. Does anyone know why Oshlansky didn't start though, I doubt it's seirous I just didn't know.

Linebackers
I would have liked to see Wilhelm play today, but unfortunately he did not. Cooper did not do much out there, for someone who is expected to start the season, but didn't look terrible either. He wasn't one of the key guys I was focusing in on though, since his role is pretty much established. One guy who I lost a lot of confidence in is Dobbins. I don't feel he can play at an NFL starting level yet, which is concerning since he started the game. He was too often being pushed back, not getting off blocks, and just getting in the way, which we can't afford. That is not what we need from our linebackers, and I feel he can't start, based on today. Waters on the other hand, I was very happy with. Another rookie who did well, Waters was much better with getting off blocks then Dobbins, and made many more impact plays I felt, and was more often to the ball, despite having less tackles. I also felt he was much more aware in coverage and run support then Dobbins was, despite being a rookie. Polk played well, and according to NFL.com led the Chargers in tackles, but also played a significantly while longer. He looks like he'll be average, but nothing special. Merriman and Phillips did not play long enough for me to judge, although neither of them really got that close to the QB when they were in, which borderline concerns me. Though its still early, it would have been nice if they were able to rush the passer a little better, especially on the opening drive where the secondary was more or less torn apart. Harris looked decent out there, and is always a solid depth guy. The rest, are mostly insignifcant, or I forgot to mention them, but no one else really caught my eye in the linebacking core.

Secondary
This was something I was focusing big on this game. Jammer is obviously the guy to start with, since he's our leader in the secondary. There wasn't much to say about him, he wasn't in there too long. Unfortunately he got a lot of blame for the touchdown that McCree let up. He could have played it better, but McCree was backpedalling and should have been over the top on that. That play shouldn't go against Jammer. Florence I thought played well, and I'm really bummed he wont be here next year. His pick was nice, it shows he's been working on his hands big time, which he has, but it also came with a penalty, and a rather obvious one. That's gotta be fixed, but it is still early, and overall I thought he looked decent out there. Cromartie I didn't see much of out there, which isn't bad or good. If I'm mistaken someone let me know, since I was mostly focusing on Weddle when he was out there, but I didn't see Cromartie get beat very often, which is a good sign. He won't start this year, which means he'll still have time to grow as well. Hart really didn't show me anything, and I think Weddle far outpreformed him today. Granted, he wasn't out there as long, and he didn't make any huge mistakes, but he didn't make many plays either. McCree I was furious with. For a guy who is our best safety, and should be a leader in the secondary, he cannot get beat in quarters, where he has the deep middle/right part of the field. It made the secondary look much worse then it played, and it looked really poor for Jammer. Hopefully it was just something he was confused on and can be fixed in films before the season starts, but that's not a great way to start off. Weddle I was so impressed with. His interception was nice, however it really was kind of given to him. It was an overthrow that went right in his area, but credit should still be given for making the play. His intensity though was great. He was always hitting or always moving, and always ready to play. He read the run and pass well, and was always up in run support, or on his zone/man in coverage. I couldn't have been happier with him, he's a smart kid. Gordon I thought looked very poor, and was not impressed with. I feel he'll be cut this year but I could be wrong. Oliver was beat bad on the touchdown, and played the worst of all the rookies in my opinion. Granted he's been with the team the shortest, but his speed looked to be a concern. He did however have burst on the blitz and tracked down Wallace, so maybe it was just nerves that got him, but his coverage skills have to improve. I think he'll make the team as the fourth corner, behind Jammer, Florence, and Cro, but I feel Weddle would go in at corner before he did. Basically He's there to be groomed for nickel next year.

Special Teams
Kaeding and Scifres both looked great, Kaeding made the 50 yarder, Scifres had some booming punts. The coverage was pretty good all around, but the return game was just average. I didn't focus much on special teams this game.

Overall
Sloppy first half, as to be expected. Who knows how much missing LT hurt us though, he's our team, so naturally the offense won't be as crisp. I liked what I saw out of all the rookies though. The big concerns I have right now is if the O-Line can play at least years level, if the receivers can stay focused (VJ, Davis, Floyd mainly), how the linebackers will play, and how our pass rush will be. Overall, not a terrible game, but not a great one either. We need better preparation.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 12:47 PM
Again i think we the subtration of Marty our team has taken a large step backward. remember, where Marty was weak (offense) cameron was amazing... I keep hearing that this Norv thing will maintain the offense and not hurt the defense (since he wouldnt change it) but i disagree greatly..

In san francisco rememeber what he did- he turned alex smith into an okay quarterback. Now im not bashing smith but there is a reason for that... Norv had a very conservative offense focusing on ball control .. Sound firmiliar? If you guys recall, LT ways a 100 rec runningback with that kind of offense... alot of short passes to the running back .. a short inside run.. then shotgun on third down.. Extremely predictable, very dependent on the runningback..I dont like it becuase the TE doesnt get involved and the WR dont go long

on the positive side, thats exactly what our offense is

who's this cottrell guy and what the hell is he doing?

JK17
08-13-2007, 12:56 PM
Again i think we the subtration of Marty our team has taken a large step backward. remember, where Marty was weak (offense) cameron was amazing... I keep hearing that this Norv thing will maintain the offense and not hurt the defense (since he wouldnt change it) but i disagree greatly..

In san francisco rememeber what he did- he turned alex smith into an okay quarterback. Now im not bashing smith but there is a reason for that... Norv had a very conservative offense focusing on ball control .. Sound firmiliar? If you guys recall, LT ways a 100 rec runningback with that kind of offense... alot of short passes to the running back .. a short inside run.. then shotgun on third down.. Extremely predictable, very dependent on the runningback..I dont like it becuase the TE doesnt get involved and the WR dont go long

on the positive side, thats exactly what our offense is

who's this cottrell guy and what the hell is he doing?

The reason I'm not worried about Norv's offense is because like you said, that's what our offense is catered to. Short, precise passes, focussed around the running game and Tomlinson. It's what our receivers are set up for, and it's what our running game is best used with. The reason I am not as concerned as you is because look at the invovlement our TE's did have in the preseason game. Chandler looked great out there, and Rivers' first (I think) completion was on the rollout to Gates, a play that went for 18 yards. Hopefully the addition of Davis, and what looked like Norv trying to utilize him early on, will allow Norv to go deep, but if not, I'm still not concerned, Davis' speed alone could stretch the field both on revereses (opens up the middle for the run), and on deep decoy routes (opens up the underneath for VJ, Floyd, and Gates).

Defense though, I am a little concerned with Cotrell. What I Hope is he was simply keeping the defense quiet and vanilla, because it was the first preseason game. But we got next to no pressure at all on any of the quarterbacks, until the end of the game with Oliver. That flat out can't happen, we need to be aggressive and crazy with our blitzes, it's what the defense is suited for. We can't afford to not let Merriman, Phillips, Castillo, and the other linebackers mix it up a little to get after the QB.

Overall, my biggest dissapointment in the coaching staff was the terrible discipline we had. That was the biggest fear going into the year, how Norv would uphold the team's discipline, and if he could match what Marty did, not on the field but in the locker room, and he failed miserably at that last night. The playcalling on offense and defense can be chalked up to not wanting to be too creative in the first game of the preseason, so don't get too worried about the offense being predictable, or the defense not being like Wade's (though I admit, I am a little worried myself about the defense). It is also possible though, the reason you find the playcalling so predictable is because you've followed the offense for so long you know what to expect. Almost all offenses will be predictable if you've studied them long enough, but no matter how predictable they are, Norv, for the most part, has always had success with his offenses.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 01:10 PM
The reason I'm not worried about Norv's offense is because like you said, that's what our offense is catered to. Short, precise passes, focussed around the running game and Tomlinson. It's what our receivers are set up for, and it's what our running game is best used with. The reason I am not as concerned as you is because look at the invovlement our TE's did have in the preseason game. Chandler looked great out there, and Rivers' first (I think) completion was on the rollout to Gates, a play that went for 18 yards. Hopefully the addition of Davis, and what looked like Norv trying to utilize him early on, will allow Norv to go deep, but if not, I'm still not concerned, Davis' speed alone could stretch the field both on revereses (opens up the middle for the run), and on deep decoy routes (opens up the underneath for VJ, Floyd, and Gates).

Defense though, I am a little concerned with Cotrell. What I Hope is he was simply keeping the defense quiet and vanilla, because it was the first preseason game. But we got next to no pressure at all on any of the quarterbacks, until the end of the game with Oliver. That flat out can't happen, we need to be aggressive and crazy with our blitzes, it's what the defense is suited for. We can't afford to not let Merriman, Phillips, Castillo, and the other linebackers mix it up a little to get after the QB.

Overall, my biggest dissapointment in the coaching staff was the terrible discipline we had. That was the biggest fear going into the year, how Norv would uphold the team's discipline, and if he could match what Marty did, not on the field but in the locker room, and he failed miserably at that last night. The playcalling on offense and defense can be chalked up to not wanting to be too creative in the first game of the preseason, so don't get too worried about the offense being predictable, or the defense not being like Wade's (though I admit, I am a little worried myself about the defense). It is also possible though, the reason you find the playcalling so predictable is because you've followed the offense for so long you know what to expect. Almost all offenses will be predictable if you've studied them long enough, but no matter how predictable they are, Norv, for the most part, has always had success with his offenses.

I agree mostly with what you've said..

to extend on it- Although i do find it a factor, the duration and extent to how i watch games, but i still think its predictable. Look as far back as the washington term he spent at the helm, and maybe some Mr. Concussion (his OC stint w/cowboys). Largely the offense consisted of short passes - big time west coast stuff. I seriously disapprove with that strategy because i believe it just stunts the growth of all the players involved.. how are our young recievers gonna get better? VJ isnt good at running slants but thats all hes gonna be doing. Rivers? forget about him throwing deep over the middle- thats something that will not be exploited in this offense.

I'm just concerned with a 2 minute offense and the weaknesses of our recievers being exploited. I see now why we didnt go after jarrett (although im still confused why we didnt go after rice) .. because davis is the quick good handed reciever we need.. I expect him to start double digit games this year

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:16 PM
I agree mostly with what you've said..

to extend on it- Although i do find it a factor, the duration and extent to how i watch games, but i still think its predictable. Look as far back as the washington term he spent at the helm, and maybe some Mr. Concussion (his OC stint w/cowboys). Largely the offense consisted of short passes - big time west coast stuff. I seriously disapprove with that strategy because i believe it just stunts the growth of all the players involved.. how are our young recievers gonna get better? VJ isnt good at running slants but thats all hes gonna be doing. Rivers? forget about him throwing deep over the middle- thats something that will not be exploited in this offense.

I'm just concerned with a 2 minute offense and the weaknesses of our recievers being exploited. I see now why we didnt go after jarrett (although im still confused why we didnt go after rice) .. because davis is the quick good handed reciever we need.. I expect him to start double digit games this year

Hopefully we see both sides, offense and defense develop some more wrinkles before the season starts. And hopefully we learn how to stop committing penalties too.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 01:21 PM
Hopefully we see both sides, offense and defense develop some more wrinkles before the season starts. And hopefully we learn how to stop committing penalties too.

On a positive note i thought dobbins played very well.. but the DE that replaced Igor just simply isnt strong enough to be a quality backup

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:22 PM
On a positive note i thought dobbins played very well.. but the DE that replaced Igor just simply isnt strong enough to be a quality backup

I disagree on that, I was very disapointed with how Dobbins played. Everytime I saw him he was in the way, or getting pushed back by a blocker, or too slow in coverage. I thought he struggled way toooo much to be a starter at this point in his career. For depth he's fine, but I expected him to play much better, since he started the game.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 01:29 PM
I disagree on that, I was very disapointed with how Dobbins played. Everytime I saw him he was in the way, or getting pushed back by a blocker, or too slow in coverage. I thought he struggled way toooo much to be a starter at this point in his career. For depth he's fine, but I expected him to play much better, since he started the game.

Didn't you say that weddle played very well because he was showing alot of effort and went 110%? to me dobbins had a constant motor and never slowed up.. he may have been slowed in the running game, and doesnt have the mobility one would like in the passing game but he had a constant motor and thats all you can ask for from a backup. As far as weddle who ill agree with you played well, but didnt exactly seperate himself from dobbins preformance. the only differences i can see is the positions they play, and the seattle quarterbacks reluctance to test weddle and scramble more. IMO dobbins weaknesses were exposed and the game played to teh secondaries strengths..

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:32 PM
Didn't you say that weddle played very well because he was showing alot of effort and went 110%? to me dobbins had a constant motor and never slowed up.. he may have been slowed in the running game, and doesnt have the mobility one would like in the passing game but he had a constant motor and thats all you can ask for from a backup. As far as weddle who ill agree with you played well, but didnt exactly seperate himself from dobbins preformance. the only differences i can see is the positions they play, and the seattle quarterbacks reluctance to test weddle and scramble more. IMO dobbins weaknesses were exposed and the game played to teh secondaries strengths..

I didn't see the motor out of Dobbins, as much as I saw it out of some of the other linebackers, like Waters who I thought played great. Weddle did have his motor going 110% and never slowed up, but he made things happen when they did. As far as a backup, yeah Dobbins is okay, what I mean is as a starter I'm disapointed. He might not have slowed up, but he was constantly pushed backwards and out of position. This is different from Weddle, Weddle hawked to the ball and was always in position to make the plays, whereas Dobbins was there....downfield.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 01:39 PM
I didn't see the motor out of Dobbins, as much as I saw it out of some of the other linebackers, like Waters who I thought played great. Weddle did have his motor going 110% and never slowed up, but he made things happen when they did. As far as a backup, yeah Dobbins is okay, what I mean is as a starter I'm disapointed. He might not have slowed up, but he was constantly pushed backwards and out of position. This is different from Weddle, Weddle hawked to the ball and was always in position to make the plays, whereas Dobbins was there....downfield.

yeah but then i guess you gotta consider that the seattle seahawk line (starting line) is very good? is it not? seneca wallace does not pass effectively.. i will need to see weddle play more to make a fair judgement on him because he just simply wasnt tested and was allowed to ball hawk..

beause of your extensive linebacking experience ill take your word for it that dobbins is a horrible player and we should just give up on him as a starter since hes not strong enough to beat the run and hes not fast either

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:41 PM
yeah but then i guess you gotta consider that the seattle seahawk line (starting line) is very good? is it not? seneca wallace does not pass effectively.. i will need to see weddle play more to make a fair judgement on him because he just simply wasnt tested and was allowed to ball hawk..

True, and Dobbins also had to go against more first stringers then Weddle so it's a fair statement to make. But based on what I saw, which is all I can do from this game, Weddle's performance was hands down better then Dobbins'.

beause of your extensive linebacking experience ill take your word for it that dobbins is a horrible player and we should just give up on him as a starter since hes not strong enough to beat the run and hes not fast either

Well I mean hold on, I don't remember saying we should give up on Dobbins just yet, but from what I saw in the game, he did not belong with the first unit. He's a second year player, with a lot of heart, so who knows whats in his future, but right now, based on last game, he doesn't have the tools we need to start him.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 01:47 PM
True, and Dobbins also had to go against more first stringers then Weddle so it's a fair statement to make. But based on what I saw, which is all I can do from this game, Weddle's performance was hands down better then Dobbins'.



Well I mean hold on, I don't remember saying we should give up on Dobbins just yet, but from what I saw in the game, he did not belong with the first unit. He's a second year player, with a lot of heart, so who knows whats in his future, but right now, based on last game, he doesn't have the tools we need to start him.

So hold on i dont get it... lets do a short review

-Dobbins is and will never be fast
-We drafted him for his hitting and run defense
-He was being pushed back in nearly all running plays
-He was clearly ineffective

So if he has no speed, no strength.. whats he good for? why not pass judgement on him? he cant cut it. simply put. hes a career backup?
Or do you think that maybe hell be less ineffective the next game.. because ... hes gonna... um.. get stronger? or maybe hell magically develop speed and be donnie edwards?

which is it?

JK17
08-13-2007, 01:56 PM
So hold on i dont get it... lets do a short review

-Dobbins is and will never be fast
-We drafted him for his hitting and run defense
-He was being pushed back in nearly all running plays
-He was clearly ineffective

So if he has no speed, no strength.. whats he good for? why not pass judgement on him? he cant cut it. simply put. hes a career backup?
Or do you think that maybe hell be less ineffective the next game.. because ... hes gonna... um.. get stronger? or maybe hell magically develop speed and be donnie edwards?

which is it?

Are you serious right now?

Dobbins' speed will never be his strong aspect of the game, I said that, and I agree with it. We did draft him for his hitting and run defense, I didn't say that, but I agree with it. He was being pushed back, and he was ineffective, I said those things and agree with them.

He has strength, I didn't say he didn't, but he didn't use it well enough in this game. His speed isn't where I'd want it to be, but that doesn't mean he has none at all. Why shouldn't we pass judgement on him? Because as hard as I was on him for this game, I don't remember ever saying players can't and don't develop. He's a second year player, and all I said was I was disapointed in what he showed in the game, and that this year he can't start, not yet at least. It's not a cut him or start him situation, it's not a one or the other thing. He'll develop, hopefully, he'll build on his technique and understanding of the defense which is what I thought his problem were. He was getting stood up by blockers, which is two things, strength and technique. The strength is there but his technique isn't. He can build on that, but he hasn't built on it enough to be effective as a starter, yet. He struggled in coverage, partly because he's a linebacker and not as fast, but partly because he didn't understand as well his coverage, or recognize the receiver's pattern, things that he'll pick up in time.

I stand by what I said, that I was disapointed and he is not ready to start yet, but I don't remember ever saying he won't develop into a player, or we should get rid of him now.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 02:04 PM
Are you serious right now?

Dobbins' speed will never be his strong aspect of the game, I said that, and I agree with it. We did draft him for his hitting and run defense, I didn't say that, but I agree with it. He was being pushed back, and he was ineffective, I said those things and agree with them.

He has strength, I didn't say he didn't, but he didn't use it well enough in this game. His speed isn't where I'd want it to be, but that doesn't mean he has none at all. Why shouldn't we pass judgement on him? Because as hard as I was on him for this game, I don't remember ever saying players can't and don't develop. He's a second year player, and all I said was I was disapointed in what he showed in the game, and that this year he can't start, not yet at least. It's not a cut him or start him situation, it's not a one or the other thing. He'll develop, hopefully, he'll build on his technique and understanding of the defense which is what I thought his problem were. He was getting stood up by blockers, which is two things, strength and technique. The strength is there but his technique isn't. He can build on that, but he hasn't built on it enough to be effective as a starter, yet. He struggled in coverage, partly because he's a linebacker and not as fast, but partly because he didn't understand as well his coverage, or recognize the receiver's pattern, things that he'll pick up in time.

I stand by what I said, that I was disapointed and he is not ready to start yet, but I don't remember ever saying he won't develop into a player, or we should get rid of him now.


first let me point out that i dont think you gave up on dobbins, i know you didnt say anything about development. What i did was to exaggerate the problems and the situation at hand to point out that you took both sides in the argumet

you said that he was getting pushed back nearly every run play.. you agreed that he was not a good pass defender.. and he has no speed.

Just to confirm thats saying he was bad at everything a LB needs to be concerned with. And after you did so you said you wouldnt give up on him becuase hes still good and its silly to cut him..

yeah hes young and he could develop but how long are we gona be waiting if hes not good at anything?

Let me point out that last statement is also an exaggeration to make a point.

JK17
08-13-2007, 02:13 PM
first let me point out that i dont think you gave up on dobbins, i know you didnt say anything about development. What i did was to exaggerate the problems and the situation at hand to point out that you took both sides in the argumet

Hardly took both sides in the argument. I am still critical of Dobbins, and still maintain that he played poorly and cannot play at a starting level this year. The only thing I said, in support of Dobbins', is that he is young, and has the heart and strength to succeed, if he can develop. That's not taking both sides, or taking sides at all, it's just common sense that a player who works hard, like Dobbins does, can succeed.

you said that he was getting pushed back nearly every run play.. you agreed that he was not a good pass defender.. and he has no speed.

Just to confirm thats saying he was bad at everything a LB needs to be concerned with. And after you did so you said you wouldnt give up on him becuase hes still good and its silly to cut him..

I did say he was getting pushed back, and he was not a good pass defender. That is everything he should be concerned with, and that's exactly the reason I said he cannot start this year. I wouldn't give up on him yet for a number of reasons. First of all, he does have tools to be a good linebacker. I didn't say he was good yet, but he can be somewhere down the road. Secondly, we need depth at linebacker. Despite a poor performance against Seattle, I only felt it was so poor because it was in a starting scenario. Amongst our ILB's, in my opinion we have the main five guys, Wilhelm, Cooper, Waters, Dobbins, and Siler as the guys we may carry. I don't know if we'll carry all of them, but I expect us to carry at least four. Wilhelm and Cooper will have to start the season, and I was most impressed with Waters as a linebacker in this game. That still leaves a spot for Dobbins who is a decent backup and good special teams player. There's no reason to cut him, it is silly. But it's not silly to cut him beacuse I think he's "good", because right now he still isn't. I never said he was.

yeah hes young and he could develop but how long are we gona be waiting if hes not good at anything?

Let me point out that last statement is also an exaggeration to make a point.

Yea, I know that's an exageration, but who knows how long we'll be waiting? Hopefully we never have to go that deep, because, hopefully, Wilhelm and Cooper will be great, and Waters will be great as well. But, if injuries do take their course, it doesn't hurt to keep Dobbins around a couple years and let him develop, and who knows, when those guys are gone or proven ineffective, maybe he will have matured into a good linebacker. If not, he's a great special teams option as well. We're not going to have studs everywhere on the roster, especially in the depth positions. So why not let him develop?

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 02:20 PM
Hardly took both sides in the argument. I am still critical of Dobbins, and still maintain that he played poorly and cannot play at a starting level this year. The only thing I said, in support of Dobbins', is that he is young, and has the heart and strength to succeed, if he can develop. That's not taking both sides, or taking sides at all, it's just common sense that a player who works hard, like Dobbins does, can succeed.



I did say he was getting pushed back, and he was not a good pass defender. That is everything he should be concerned with, and that's exactly the reason I said he cannot start this year. I wouldn't give up on him yet for a number of reasons. First of all, he does have tools to be a good linebacker. I didn't say he was good yet, but he can be somewhere down the road. Secondly, we need depth at linebacker. Despite a poor performance against Seattle, I only felt it was so poor because it was in a starting scenario. Amongst our ILB's, in my opinion we have the main five guys, Wilhelm, Cooper, Waters, Dobbins, and Siler as the guys we may carry. I don't know if we'll carry all of them, but I expect us to carry at least four. Wilhelm and Cooper will have to start the season, and I was most impressed with Waters as a linebacker in this game. That still leaves a spot for Dobbins who is a decent backup and good special teams player. There's no reason to cut him, it is silly. But it's not silly to cut him beacuse I think he's "good", because right now he still isn't. I never said he was.



Yea, I know that's an exageration, but who knows how long we'll be waiting? Hopefully we never have to go that deep, because, hopefully, Wilhelm and Cooper will be great, and Waters will be great as well. But, if injuries do take their course, it doesn't hurt to keep Dobbins around a couple years and let him develop, and who knows, when those guys are gone or proven ineffective, maybe he will have matured into a good linebacker. If not, he's a great special teams option as well. We're not going to have studs everywhere on the roster, especially in the depth positions. So why not let him develop?


First let me just add that i thought cooper player okay, but now that im really paying attention to him.. he dosnt seem very smart.. Like not perceptive.. you know what i mean? It seems like he kinda had a light switch that turned off every time he had to adjust

As for dobbins let me just say that i agree we shouldnt cut him i agree that he will get better and i agree that hes a quality backup.
I will disagree with you when you said you didnt take both sides cause it felt like you didnt like the idea of dobbins to a very high degree, but seemed like you were completely content on keeping him. You may see that as not taking both sides but what i see is this: a backup isnt depth, its a potential starter. If hes not a potential starter then what is he? a backup?.. doesnt make sense to me.

If you're gonna say that he is a potential starter .. please explain in depth how because my heads gonna be spinning on what you think of him...

JK17
08-13-2007, 02:27 PM
First let me just add that i thought cooper player okay, but now that im really paying attention to him.. he dosnt seem very smart.. Like not perceptive.. you know what i mean? It seems like he kinda had a light switch that turned off every time he had to adjust

As for dobbins let me just say that i agree we shouldnt cut him i agree that he will get better and i agree that hes a quality backup.
I will disagree with you when you said you didnt take both sides cause it felt like you didnt like the idea of dobbins to a very high degree, but seemed like you were completely content on keeping him. You may see that as not taking both sides but what i see is this: a backup isnt depth, its a potential starter. If hes not a potential starter then what is he? a backup?.. doesnt make sense to me.

If you're gonna say that he is a potential starter .. please explain in depth how because my heads gonna be spinning on what you think of him...

My stance on him, which you can feel free to check my posts for anything that cross-references what I am saying right now, is that right now, at this point in his career he cannot start, and didn't look like he could in anyway. For depth, I have no problem with him. We wouln't be able to find anyone else to give us depth anyway, and despite his poor performance, he still has time to develop. Yes he is a backup, he's not a potential starter, not yet. I never said I intend to see him starting either, but if, for some reason over the next few years, he develops to be ahead of any of the other three I mentioned before him, then by all means he should start.

That's it. In short, He can't start now, or probably this season, but I don't want to eliminate his entire career based on one bad preseason game.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 02:44 PM
My stance on him, which you can feel free to check my posts for anything that cross-references what I am saying right now, is that right now, at this point in his career he cannot start, and didn't look like he could in anyway. For depth, I have no problem with him. We wouln't be able to find anyone else to give us depth anyway, and despite his poor performance, he still has time to develop. Yes he is a backup, he's not a potential starter, not yet. I never said I intend to see him starting either, but if, for some reason over the next few years, he develops to be ahead of any of the other three I mentioned before him, then by all means he should start.

That's it. In short, He can't start now, or probably this season, but I don't want to eliminate his entire career based on one bad preseason game.

Okay then i guess thats that, maybe i just misunderstood the severity of your earlier statements which led me to believe that you were unhappy with him... which was why i was confused as to why you said that he wasnt bad and should undoubtably stay on the team.

Yes its one preseason game and thats what it all really boils down to.. but that still doesnt mean its not a potential sign of things to come.

I personally feel that Dobbins knows his technique, is strong enough, and competent enough to be the starter. Since i like him, i suppose it added to my fuel to engage you in this conversation and i appologize for that.


What you've said..
-I disagree on that, I was very disapointed with how Dobbins played. Everytime I saw him he was in the way, or getting pushed back by a blocker, or too slow in coverage. I thought he struggled way toooo much to be a starter at this point in his career.
- This is different from Weddle, Weddle hawked to the ball and was always in position to make the plays, whereas Dobbins was there....downfield.
-I didn't see the motor out of Dobbins, as much as I saw it out of some of the other linebackers, like Waters who I thought played great."


those statements gave me the impression that in your eyes Dobbins had no strenths and only weaknesses... but you wanna keep this guy you talked about like this right?

JK17
08-13-2007, 02:50 PM
What you've said..
-I disagree on that, I was very disapointed with how Dobbins played. Everytime I saw him he was in the way, or getting pushed back by a blocker, or too slow in coverage. I thought he struggled way toooo much to be a starter at this point in his career.
- This is different from Weddle, Weddle hawked to the ball and was always in position to make the plays, whereas Dobbins was there....downfield.
-I didn't see the motor out of Dobbins, as much as I saw it out of some of the other linebackers, like Waters who I thought played great."


those statements gave me the impression that in your eyes Dobbins had no strenths and only weaknesses... but you wanna keep this guy you talked about like this right?

Those statements though are all focused on him either starting this year, or compared to other players who I thought played significantly better, like Weddle and Waters.

Either way, I think it now just comes down to a misunderstanding on both our parts of what constitutes supporting or attacking Dobbins, and I Don't see anywhere else the debate on him is going to lead too, so I'll switch to something new...

What were your thoughts on the O-Line? To be honest I was fairly disapointed in them. McNeill flat out missed a block that let Rivers get killed, and we struggled in some blitz pickup. It was early in the preseason, as early as it gets, so I woulnd't expect them to be completely gelled yet anyway, though I expected a little bit more out of them. There was way to much QB pressure.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 02:59 PM
Those statements though are all focused on him either starting this year, or compared to other players who I thought played significantly better, like Weddle and Waters.

Either way, I think it now just comes down to a misunderstanding on both our parts of what constitutes supporting or attacking Dobbins, and I Don't see anywhere else the debate on him is going to lead too, so I'll switch to something new...

What were your thoughts on the O-Line? To be honest I was fairly disapointed in them. McNeill flat out missed a block that let Rivers get killed, and we struggled in some blitz pickup. It was early in the preseason, as early as it gets, so I woulnd't expect them to be completely gelled yet anyway, though I expected a little bit more out of them. There was way to much QB pressure.

I was EXTREMELY disappointed... Honestly i could rant for hours about the few minutes i just saw of the first preseason game and tell you why were not only not going to the super bowl but neither the playoffs or a winning record..

In short, im unsatisfied. Honestly im really thinking back to the Marty's days and i understand now what we had and gave up so easily. We really took for granted all the things Marty did. Marty didnt touch the offensive skill players, he left that to the peoples who's opinion mattered (specific coaches and cam).. I felt Marty's bread and butter was the following

- Motivation
- Preperation
- Communication
- No penalties
- Respect
- Grit

What i saw was a team that was unfocused and unprepared. The offensive line was the perfect example. They didnt talk, they didnt have the grit, and were penalized heavily. Since when do they just not block people, Mcneil Mr. Perfect Blocker especially?

This all may all be stemming from a lack of respect for the head coach..

JK17
08-13-2007, 03:07 PM
I was EXTREMELY disappointed... Honestly i could rant for hours about the few minutes i just saw of the first preseason game and tell you why were not only not going to the super bowl but neither the playoffs or a winning record..

In short, im unsatisfied. Honestly im really thinking back to the Marty's days and i understand now what we had and gave up so easily. We really took for granted all the things Marty did. Marty didnt touch the offensive skill players, he left that to the peoples who's opinion mattered (specific coaches and cam).. I felt Marty's bread and butter was the following

- Motivation
- Preperation
- Communication
- No penalties
- Respect
- Grit

What i saw was a team that was unfocused and unprepared. The offensive line was the perfect example. They didnt talk, they didnt have the grit, and were penalized heavily. Since when do they just not block people, Mcneil Mr. Perfect Blocker especially?

This all may all be stemming from a lack of respect for the head coach..

I wouldn't panic on losing Marty just yet, but I don't necesarily disagree with a lot of what you said there. If the trend continues next game, it may be time to worry a little bit about what we actaully lost in giving up Marty.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 03:09 PM
I wouldn't panic on losing Marty just yet, but I don't necesarily disagree with a lot of what you said there. If the trend continues next game, it may be time to worry a little bit about what we actaully lost in giving up Marty.

Maybe we dont have to panic about those silly penalties but i dont think its right to head into the season expecting a smooth sail.

JK17
08-13-2007, 03:15 PM
Maybe we dont have to panic about those silly penalties but i dont think its right to head into the season expecting a smooth sail.

Well it's not going to be a repeat of last year. For one, our schedule wasn't very hard at all last year, and we did catch a bunch of lucky breaks that helped us to get to 14-2. So smooth sail, definitely not.

In addition to that, we did lose Marty, who we knew could win for us, but then again, the whole reason we got rid of him was that he couldn't win in the playoffs, and him and AJ were miles apart on building a championsihp team. For both of those reasons he had to go. He couldn't get it done in the playoffs, his fault or not, his teams never have gotten it done. As far as the feud with AJ it may have seemed petty, but I don't think it was. Marty gets a lot of the sympahty from the media becasue AJ is arrogant and he is cocky. But he's also the best at what he does, and I'll take his side everytime. We couldn't win with that disfunction and pressure on Marty for a whole nother year, so one of them had to go, and it was Marty...

That wasn't meant to turn into an AJ vs. Marty debate, but even if we kept Marty, there wouldn't have been a smooth sail to the postseason anyway. Hopefully we can keep it together until we get there though, and let the extra experience we gained last year carry us to the Super Bowl. Hopefully.

As far as discipline goes though, it sure sucks losing Marty. Norv better get his act together. Soon.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 03:27 PM
Well it's not going to be a repeat of last year. For one, our schedule wasn't very hard at all last year, and we did catch a bunch of lucky breaks that helped us to get to 14-2. So smooth sail, definitely not.

In addition to that, we did lose Marty, who we knew could win for us, but then again, the whole reason we got rid of him was that he couldn't win in the playoffs, and him and AJ were miles apart on building a championsihp team. For both of those reasons he had to go. He couldn't get it done in the playoffs, his fault or not, his teams never have gotten it done. As far as the feud with AJ it may have seemed petty, but I don't think it was. Marty gets a lot of the sympahty from the media becasue AJ is arrogant and he is cocky. But he's also the best at what he does, and I'll take his side everytime. We couldn't win with that disfunction and pressure on Marty for a whole nother year, so one of them had to go, and it was Marty...

That wasn't meant to turn into an AJ vs. Marty debate, but even if we kept Marty, there wouldn't have been a smooth sail to the postseason anyway. Hopefully we can keep it together until we get there though, and let the extra experience we gained last year carry us to the Super Bowl. Hopefully.

As far as discipline goes though, it sure sucks losing Marty. Norv better get his act together. Soon.


I dont mean to antagonize any possible Marty vs AJ debate but I really think AJ made a mistake letting Marty go. I mean think about it maybe with Marty the coaches stay and we stay consistant...

Looking back on it Marty did everythig he could - he had his head piece off remember that!? he wanted to iwn so badly and i think if we gave him another shot he would've done it.

On that note i think AJ is a god and if he asked me to Jump off a bridge because it was good for my health or asked me to jump rope with cobras because it would improve my speed or someting i wouldnt hesitate. AJ can do no wrong in my eyes, which includes murder. If he decided to go on a little killing rampage here and there.. i would turn a blind eye..

okay obviously all thats kind ridiculous but honestly.. hes really good and i'm sure there was no option but to get rid of marty... and cam.. and wade.. and those other guys...

JK17
08-13-2007, 03:31 PM
I dont mean to antagonize any possible Marty vs AJ debate but I really think AJ made a mistake letting Marty go. I mean think about it maybe with Marty the coaches stay and we stay consistant...

Looking back on it Marty did everythig he could - he had his head piece off remember that!? he wanted to iwn so badly and i think if we gave him another shot he would've done it.

On that note i think AJ is a god and if he asked me to Jump off a bridge because it was good for my health or asked me to jump rope with cobras because it would improve my speed or someting i wouldnt hesitate. AJ can do no wrong in my eyes, which includes murder. If he decided to go on a little killing rampage here and there.. i would turn a blind eye..

okay obviously all thats kind ridiculous but honestly.. hes really good and i'm sure there was no option but to get rid of marty... and cam.. and wade.. and those other guys...

I know how you feel about AJ, and I'm not going to open this up any further then, because the last thing we need is an AJ vs. Marty debate, when its over with already.

So to keep it rollin, haha, what was your overall opinion of the secondary. For the most part I was focused in on Weddle, so to be honest I missed a lot of how the rest of the secondary played. Obviously I was disapointed with McCree, but I thought Jammer and Florence each played decent. Florence I thought showed a lot on that interception. Even though it was nullified by his penalty that was the biggest part of his game he was missing last year, the instinct to go for the ball. Cromartie I didn't see much of, which I guess was fine, since it meant he wasn't in to much trouble ever, but Oliver and Gordon both looked pretty bad. You already know how I felt about Weddle, and Hart I was neither impressed or upset with.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 03:40 PM
I know how you feel about AJ, and I'm not going to open this up any further then, because the last thing we need is an AJ vs. Marty debate, when its over with already.

So to keep it rollin, haha, what was your overall opinion of the secondary. For the most part I was focused in on Weddle, so to be honest I missed a lot of how the rest of the secondary played. Obviously I was disapointed with McCree, but I thought Jammer and Florence each played decent. Florence I thought showed a lot on that interception. Even though it was nullified by his penalty that was the biggest part of his game he was missing last year, the instinct to go for the ball. Cromartie I didn't see much of, which I guess was fine, since it meant he wasn't in to much trouble ever, but Oliver and Gordon both looked pretty bad. You already know how I felt about Weddle, and Hart I was neither impressed or upset with.


Well i felt that there was a communication problem and not so much gameplanning or executing issues. since its presason we know they were running basic defense (they played quarter defense as evidenced by the touchdown) but couldnt even do that. And its not so much that mccree got beat on that play as he wasnt expecting a go pattern. If you look closely jammer never got up on the wr and instead played him as though he had help. but mcree was not even aware that he ahd to do this and was instead watching a wr streaking over the middle about to enter his zone. If they had talked and jammer had let mccree know that he was going to play as though mccree was waiting over the top then marlon would have had to been back already and not running backwards... so its a communication problem not execution in my opnion

as for cromartie i was slightly disappointed not in him but in the play of seneca wallace. Cro wasnt in for too long but when he was they never really tested him because they simply didnt throw unless it was to a wide open reciever who had beat someone else. Flo i was immensly pleased with because he showed the tenacity and drive i would expect from a Marty coached team.. i loved that penalty honesty because he wasnt playing 20 yards off like gordon and bumshack

JK17
08-13-2007, 03:45 PM
Well i felt that there was a communication problem and not so much gameplanning or executing issues. since its presason we know they were running basic defense (they played quarter defense as evidenced by the touchdown) but couldnt even do that. And its not so much that mccree got beat on that play as he wasnt expecting a go pattern. If you look closely jammer never got up on the wr and instead played him as though he had help. but mcree was not even aware that he ahd to do this and was instead watching a wr streaking over the middle about to enter his zone. If they had talked and jammer had let mccree know that he was going to play as though mccree was waiting over the top then marlon would have had to been back already and not running backwards... so its a communication problem not execution in my opnion

as for cromartie i was slightly disappointed not in him but in the play of seneca wallace. Cro wasnt in for too long but when he was they never really tested him because they simply didnt throw unless it was to a wide open reciever who had beat someone else. Flo i was immensly pleased with because he showed the tenacity and drive i would expect from a Marty coached team.. i loved that penalty honesty because he wasnt playing 20 yards off like gordon and bumshack

Agree, communication can be fixed, assuming the coaches and players take it upon themselves to work out the kinks. Almost everyone on the team is committed, and we all have good chemistry, so I expect them to do that. Although, if they ignore the communication issue, we can expect a long year.

Then again, its the first preseason game. It's not all supposed to be there.

Average OT LB
08-13-2007, 03:50 PM
Agree, communication can be fixed, assuming the coaches and players take it upon themselves to work out the kinks. Almost everyone on the team is committed, and we all have good chemistry, so I expect them to do that. Although, if they ignore the communication issue, we can expect a long year.

Then again, its the first preseason game. It's not all supposed to be there.

if your first paragraph is as easy as you made it sound there wouldnt be the diversity that there is in this league..

but it is a preseason and thats our saving grace really becaue i dont think this communication problem is a lack of playng together.. i think its just a coach who does have a great attention to detail, especially on the defensive side of the all

JK17
08-13-2007, 03:53 PM
if your first paragraph is as easy as you made it sound there wouldnt be the diversity that there is in this league..

but it is a preseason and thats our saving grace really becaue i dont think this communication problem is a lack of playng together.. i think its just a coach who does have a great attention to detail, especially on the defensive side of the all

Yeah...

so I'm gonna wait for other people to chime in, otherwise I'm going to run out of things to discuss haha.

sdpads24
08-13-2007, 08:58 PM
Do you guys think that Darren Sproles will get a roster spot? I ultimately think Craig Davis will take over as our punt returner and Turner as our kick returner. I think Andrew Pinnock could work as a 3rd running back just fine.

JK17
08-13-2007, 10:38 PM
Do you guys think that Darren Sproles will get a roster spot? I ultimately think Craig Davis will take over as our punt returner and Turner as our kick returner. I think Andrew Pinnock could work as a 3rd running back just fine.

To be honest I really just hate Andrew Pinnock, I don't like the way he runs, I don't think he can be effective. I think with what Sproles showed, if he can maintain that through the preseason, he has a roster spot locked up. We will need a replacement for Turner next year, and although Sproles doesn't have Turner's size or bruising ability, he is elusive and has a good center of balance, that helps him stay up through tackles.

Craig Davis may take over punts, and Turner will be a kick returner, but they may prefer to have Sproles on kick returns as well instead of Davis, if he becomes the #2 receiver. I've always been a Sproles fan so I'm kind of biased, but I think he serves the team better then Pinnock does.

JK17
08-14-2007, 12:14 AM
http://chargers.com/news/headlines/turner-likes-team.htm

Turner's talking about the first game...basically hashed out what we did, the receivers have to play more consistently and it starts with practice, same with miscommunication and lack of preparedness on the O-Line.

He says the penalties and such will be worked out in practice and we can expect a much better, smoother performance against St. Louis. I sure hope we can.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 12:53 AM
To be honest I really just hate Andrew Pinnock, I don't like the way he runs, I don't think he can be effective. I think with what Sproles showed, if he can maintain that through the preseason, he has a roster spot locked up. We will need a replacement for Turner next year, and although Sproles doesn't have Turner's size or bruising ability, he is elusive and has a good center of balance, that helps him stay up through tackles.

Craig Davis may take over punts, and Turner will be a kick returner, but they may prefer to have Sproles on kick returns as well instead of Davis, if he becomes the #2 receiver. I've always been a Sproles fan so I'm kind of biased, but I think he serves the team better then Pinnock does.

I agree with you that pinnock is not a good player. Your self proclaimed bias doesnt lead you to a sill resolution for the KR, sproles i feel should be both the PR and KR. Simply put, i feel that he isnt capable of being a servicable rb because of his size, but i feel his weaknesses become strengths in special teams.. also he is expendable whereas turner and davis are a tad more valubale especially if we decide to keep turner.. (which i doubt)

but i think pinnock will make the team too becasue there is no back up for neal, but that doesnt really mean much..

JK17
08-14-2007, 12:55 AM
I agree with you that pinnock is not a good player. Your self proclaimed bias doesnt lead you to a sill resolution for the KR, sproles i feel should be both the PR and KR. Simply put, i feel that he isnt capable of being a servicable rb because of his size, but i feel his weaknesses become strengths in special teams.. also he is expendable whereas turner and davis are a tad more valubale especially if we decide to keep turner.. (which i doubt)

but i think pinnock will make the team too becasue there is no back up for neal, but that doesnt really mean much..

The bolded I really agree with, that's what I feel as well....

As for Sproles playing RB, he'll probably never be a Michael Turner, but he could take a couple of draws on third downs, or screen passes, and lighten the load on LT, and on plays like those, as good as LT is, if he's tired, Sproles may be much more explosive on them.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 12:57 AM
The bolded I really agree with, that's what I feel as well....

As for Sproles playing RB, he'll probably never be a Michael Turner, but he could take a couple of draws on third downs, or screen passes, and lighten the load on LT, and on plays like those, as good as LT is, if he's tired, Sproles may be much more explosive on them.

seeing the preseason game he showed ttthats possiblity but i wonder if he can do it vs starters?

you remember quentin griffen on the broncos right? i feel they're similiar

sdpads24
08-14-2007, 12:57 AM
To be honest I really just hate Andrew Pinnock, I don't like the way he runs, I don't think he can be effective. I think with what Sproles showed, if he can maintain that through the preseason, he has a roster spot locked up. We will need a replacement for Turner next year, and although Sproles doesn't have Turner's size or bruising ability, he is elusive and has a good center of balance, that helps him stay up through tackles.

Craig Davis may take over punts, and Turner will be a kick returner, but they may prefer to have Sproles on kick returns as well instead of Davis, if he becomes the #2 receiver. I've always been a Sproles fan so I'm kind of biased, but I think he serves the team better then Pinnock does.

I hope your right regarding Sproles. I've always liked him. He has always been an exciting player to watch his whole career including college. Im just not sure if there's a roster spot out there for him if Norv Turner thinks Pinnock can be a solid 3rd Rb.

JK17
08-14-2007, 12:59 AM
seeing the preseason game he showed ttthats possiblity but i wonder if he can do it vs starters?

you remember quentin griffen on the broncos right? i feel they're similiar

Yeah, they could be, who knows. But Sproles did do some of it agianst a first team, early on. Then again, its preseason so who really knows what to think.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:00 AM
I hope your right regarding Sproles. I've always liked him. He has always been an exciting player to watch his whole career including college. Im just not sure if there's a roster spot out there for him if Norv Turner thinks Pinnock can be a solid 3rd Rb.

i understand the concern especially considering the new depth at positions especially in the defense...

i guess that means oliver wont make the team and we will go with 4 wr... remember we have what.. 3 tes or somethign? crazy depth

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:01 AM
I hope your right regarding Sproles. I've always liked him. He has always been an exciting player to watch his whole career including college. Im just not sure if there's a roster spot out there for him if Norv Turner thinks Pinnock can be a solid 3rd Rb.

Well if we keep LT, Turner, Sproles, Pinnock, and Neal its 5 RB's. It's been done before, I could see us doing it this year, but we may have to cut back somewhere else so who knows. To be honest I'm not ready right now to hash out a roster, and who I think should be cut, I just like Sproles and like what he showed, as meaningless as it may have been. It'll clear up some more as the preseason comes to a close (obviously).

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:03 AM
i understand the concern especially considering the new depth at positions especially in the defense...

i guess that means oliver wont make the team and we will go with 4 wr... remember we have what.. 3 tes or somethign? crazy depth

See this is what I'm kinda worried about now. Oliver has to make the team, if he doesn't we just threw away a fourth rounder, without really giving much of a chance to see what happens. If we only keep 4 WR, that means that Osgood has to be cut, and he's been such an impact guy on special teams, as was Camarillo though him going isn't as big a deal. It means we have VJ, Davis, Floyd, and Parker, and thats it. God this is going to suck when we have to make cuts....maybe after next game I'll take a look at the roster, and try and see who I would cut, and how it ends up for Sproles.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:05 AM
See this is what I'm kinda worried about now. Oliver has to make the team, if he doesn't we just threw away a fourth rounder, without really giving much of a chance to see what happens. If we only keep 4 WR, that means that Osgood has to be cut, and he's been such an impact guy on special teams, as was Camarillo though him going isn't as big a deal. It means we have VJ, Davis, Floyd, and Parker, and thats it. God this is going to suck when we have to make cuts....maybe after next game I'll take a look at the roster, and try and see who I would cut, and how it ends up for Sproles.


sproles is no doubt on the bubble.. i cant help but to think it would be a hassle to make room for him and he has to really go crazy these next few games to make the team...

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:06 AM
sproles is no doubt on the bubble.. i cant help but to think it would be a hassle to make room for him and he has to really go crazy these next few games to make the team...

Yeah, I didn't realize it as much until now either....then again it could be Pinnock who gets cut instead, although that means no one to put behind Lo Neal...

sdpads24
08-14-2007, 01:08 AM
See this is what I'm kinda worried about now. Oliver has to make the team, if he doesn't we just threw away a fourth rounder, without really giving much of a chance to see what happens. If we only keep 4 WR, that means that Osgood has to be cut, and he's been such an impact guy on special teams, as was Camarillo though him going isn't as big a deal. It means we have VJ, Davis, Floyd, and Parker, and thats it. God this is going to suck when we have to make cuts....maybe after next game I'll take a look at the roster, and try and see who I would cut, and how it ends up for Sproles.

You also can't forget about Legudu Naane. I thought he played pretty well on sunday.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:09 AM
we have what .. 4 safeties.. then jammer flo cro ... i cant help but to think oliver has no shot

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:15 AM
You also can't forget about Legudu Naane. I thought he played pretty well on sunday.

That's true, he will make the roster, he looked great out there. Damn, suddenly 53 seems like a much smaller number....

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:17 AM
we have what .. 4 safeties.. then jammer flo cro ... i cant help but to think oliver has no shot

Maybe Jue is a guy we could cut. It would put our safeties down to McCree, Hart, and Weddle....Weddle is versatile enough to play both safeties in case of emergency, and it would free up a spot for Oliver, who has more potential I would think then Jue, despite how bad he looked. One of the reasons they loved Weddle was his versatility...

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:22 AM
Maybe Jue is a guy we could cut. It would put our safeties down to McCree, Hart, and Weddle....Weddle is versatile enough to play both safeties in case of emergency, and it would free up a spot for Oliver, who has more potential I would think then Jue, despite how bad he looked. One of the reasons they loved Weddle was his versatility...

please.. so we dont have a 10 page argument ... call weddle 'versatile'..

In college he was a rb, qb, wr, P, S, and CB ...as well as returner.. I KNOW

this is the nfl and i doubt this kid can play both S better than the average NFL veteran enough to be called versatile.. hes a rookie

even though i tried to resist i still had a minor spat..

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:23 AM
please.. so we dont have a 10 page argument ... call weddle 'versatile'..

In college he was a rb, qb, wr, P, S, and CB ...as well as returner.. I KNOW

this is the nfl and i doubt this kid can play both S better than the average NFL veteran enough to be called versatile.. hes a rookie

even though i tried to resist i still had a minor spat..

I'm just saying Jue has been rather unimpressive since he got here...its a possibility they try to get him to back up both.

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:24 AM
I'm just saying Jue has been rather unimpressive since he got here...its a possibility they try to get him to back up both.


haha .. better i agree .. next?

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:26 AM
haha .. better i agree .. next?

Ummm....

I think we got just about everything taken care of from game one....things you'd like to see improved upon for St. Louis?

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 01:27 AM
Ummm....

I think we got just about everything taken care of from game one....things you'd like to see improved upon for St. Louis?

imma leave that for tomorrow..

sdpads24
08-14-2007, 01:39 AM
Ummm....

I think we got just about everything taken care of from game one....things you'd like to see improved upon for St. Louis?

Obviously we need to improve on bad mistakes and bad penalties, but that is typical of the first pre-season game. Our O-line has to wake up from their off-season snooze, and Cottrell needs to be more aggresive.

JK17
08-14-2007, 01:41 AM
Obviously we need to improve on bad mistakes and bad penalties, but that is typical of the first pre-season game. Our O-line has to wake up from their off-season snooze, and Cottrell needs to be more aggresive.

Yeah I don't know what I'm more concerned with. I guess it would be the penalties and jitters we had in the beginning of the game, but then again, if the O-Line can't block, and Cotrell refuses to unleash Merriman and Phillips and the rest, our secondary doesn't stand a chance, Bulger will literally pick them apart...Although I have Bulger in a fantasy league, so then again, if he didn't want to send them and keep Bulger healthy, I guess I wouldn't complain .... :p

Average OT LB
08-14-2007, 12:16 PM
Yeah I don't know what I'm more concerned with. I guess it would be the penalties and jitters we had in the beginning of the game, but then again, if the O-Line can't block, and Cotrell refuses to unleash Merriman and Phillips and the rest, our secondary doesn't stand a chance, Bulger will literally pick them apart...Although I have Bulger in a fantasy league, so then again, if he didn't want to send them and keep Bulger healthy, I guess I wouldn't complain .... :p

something tells me it wouldnt matter if you had bulger or not.. last place is your future destination