PDA

View Full Version : PFW grades the Lions


Bootland27
09-04-2007, 10:12 PM
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFL+Zone/Team+Reports/default.htm?mode=nfcnorth

QB = B
RB = B
REC = A-
OL = C
DL = B
LB = C+
DB = C-
ST = B

I must say that these grades for the most part look fair, give or take a few.

JPLUFF
09-04-2007, 10:33 PM
they definitely give our RBs a lot of credit.

WMD
09-04-2007, 11:16 PM
they definitely give our RBs a lot of credit.

Looks about fair.. I'd go B- or C+ for the QB though.

Addict
09-05-2007, 08:01 AM
DB should be a D, every NFL QB will have a field day against us

Bootland27
09-05-2007, 11:09 AM
DB should be a D, every NFL QB will have a field day against us

Yeah C- is generous, especially without bullocks.

Bootland27
09-05-2007, 11:10 AM
they definitely give our RBs a lot of credit.

We have more depth this year, so that probably factored into the grade.

P-L
09-05-2007, 11:48 AM
I think the RB and DB grades were pretty generous.

Iamcanadian
09-06-2007, 05:03 AM
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFL+Zone/Team+Reports/default.htm?mode=nfcnorth

QB = B
RB = B
REC = A-
OL = C
DL = B
LB = C+
DB = C-
ST = B

I must say that these grades for the most part look fair, give or take a few.

Besides the fact that they want to sell papers to Detroit fans which makes all their ratings suspect, I'd rate us:

QB = C Kitna is a career backup in a great offensive system
RB = C Unless Jones is suddenly healthy
WR = A definitely a team strength
OL = C Backus is still the LT and it all starts there
DL = C Rogers is now suspect and our DE aren't proven
LB = D+ Health is a key issue and MLB still looks pretty weak
DB = E huge question marks and now Bullocks is injured
ST = B

awfullyquiet
09-06-2007, 05:20 AM
they definitely give our RBs a lot of credit.

i wish it wasn't.
the L's are looking like their built for the AFL. all pass, no gas.
but. hey. next year looks like a good year to draft some OL to complement backus and hope that's all KJ needs.

JPLUFF
09-06-2007, 07:46 AM
We have more depth this year, so that probably factored into the grade.

It just seems that for a grade that high, a team should have at least 1 1000 yard back. Is there anyone on this team this year that is guaranteed to rush for that many yards?

asmitty45
09-10-2007, 10:19 AM
the db's grade hurts, but is probably accurate without bullocks

Addict
09-10-2007, 11:08 AM
the db's grade hurts, but is probably accurate without bullocks

it was accurate with bullocks as well, our backfield sucks.