PDA

View Full Version : Steelers o-line next season....


TheWood56
01-05-2008, 12:31 AM
http://pit.scout.com/2/717046.html

This is going off of an article I read (above), which means we make an effort to re-sign Faneca and Starks and we succeed in doing so. So here we go, my hopeful Steelers o-line for next season:

LT: Max Starks
LG: Kendall Simmons
C: Alan Faneca
RG: Chris Kemoeatu
RT: Willie Colon

What do you think?

Starks has played well at LT in limited action and this may be his true position considering he was a LT in college and he is left handed. Also, with Smith and his back problems now, you don't know if he's going to be able to return 100% and he only has 1 year left on his contract here anyways.

Shifting Simmons to LG may improve his play as a whole. With Simmons being more athletic and being good on the move and pulling, this may ultimately be his true position considering the LG in our scheme has to pull occassionally and generally has to be the more athletic guard of the two.

With Faneca at C, there's a very good chance this move may very well improve our o-line play as a whole. I made this move keeping in mind what Zierlein said, that being he thinks Faneca's very smart and that he could see Faneca ending his career as a C in this league. I personally think he could make for a great C and could improve our o-line play as a whole. IMO, this would be a very good thing for our o-line.

Kemoeatu finally finds himself in the starting lineup. He's a big road grader that will pave the way for the running game on the right side of the line. With some fine tuning and some starting experience, he could be a force to be reckoned with at RG. Also, IMO, he's a better fit on the right side then he is on the left, which is why he's the RG and Simmons the LG.

Colon has shown a fair bit of potential at RT. People say he's better suited inside at guard, and though that may possibly be true, he's shown he can handle the RT position and with this only being his 1st season starting, he still has a heap of time to grow and improve as a player. I think making him make the transition inside to guard would only prolong his development, so keeping him at RT where he has shown potential to be a really good player is the best thing to do IMO, and I think with Colon entering his 2nd he's only going to get better and improve. I think he could potentially be a great RT in this league.

With our o-line being in place for the next few years, we will have much more flexibility come draft time, which is a very good thing.

toonsterwu
01-05-2008, 12:36 AM
Has Faneca shown any indication on a willingness to resign? Obviously, if you can bring him back, sure. Somehow, my gut feeling is that Tomlin would probably prefer not to spend so much on an older OL guy. I also have a tough time seeing you cut the cord with Marvel. It's possible I guess. I just tend to think the higher probability lies in drafting an OL guy to eventually take his spot (and if you fail to resign Starks and Faneca, then said OT draft pick starts at RT and Colon slides into guard).

Mr. Stiller
01-05-2008, 01:58 AM
Has Faneca shown any indication on a willingness to resign? Obviously, if you can bring him back, sure. Somehow, my gut feeling is that Tomlin would probably prefer not to spend so much on an older OL guy. I also have a tough time seeing you cut the cord with Marvel. It's possible I guess. I just tend to think the higher probability lies in drafting an OL guy to eventually take his spot (and if you fail to resign Starks and Faneca, then said OT draft pick starts at RT and Colon slides into guard).

Marvel has had to have Back surgery Toon, we're not even sure he'll play again.

steelersfan27
01-05-2008, 09:23 AM
http://pit.scout.com/2/717046.html

This is going off of an article I read (above), which means we make an effort to re-sign Faneca and Starks and we succeed in doing so. So here we go, my hopeful Steelers o-line for next season:

LT: Max Starks
LG: Kendall Simmons
C: Alan Faneca
RG: Chris Kemoeatu
RT: Willie Colon

What do you think?

Starks has played well at LT in limited action and this may be his true position considering he was a LT in college and he is left handed. Also, with Smith and his back problems now, you don't know if he's going to be able to return 100% and he only has 1 year left on his contract here anyways.

Shifting Simmons to LG may improve his play as a whole. With Simmons being more athletic and being good on the move and pulling, this may ultimately be his true position considering the LG in our scheme has to pull occassionally and generally has to be the more athletic guard of the two.

With Faneca at C, there's a very good chance this move may very well improve our o-line play as a whole. I made this move keeping in mind what Zierlein said, that being he thinks Faneca's very smart and that he could see Faneca ending his career as a C in this league. I personally think he could make for a great C and could improve our o-line play as a whole. IMO, this would be a very good thing for our o-line.

Kemoeatu finally finds himself in the starting lineup. He's a big road grader that will pave the way for the running game on the right side of the line. With some fine tuning and some starting experience, he could be a force to be reckoned with at RG. Also, IMO, he's a better fit on the right side then he is on the left, which is why he's the RG and Simmons the LG.

Colon has shown a fair bit of potential at RT. People say he's better suited inside at guard, and though that may possibly be true, he's shown he can handle the RT position and with this only being his 1st season starting, he still has a heap of time to grow and improve as a player. I think making him make the transition inside to guard would only prolong his development, so keeping him at RT where he has shown potential to be a really good player is the best thing to do IMO, and I think with Colon entering his 2nd he's only going to get better and improve. I think he could potentially be a great RT in this league.

With our o-line being in place for the next few years, we will have much more flexibility come draft time, which is a very good thing.


then what do we do with mahan? cut him? hes being payed sarter money. if we cut him it would free up some cap room.

Palmer26
01-05-2008, 09:35 AM
I have my doubts about that article.

First and foremost, I doubt Faneca re-signs. With the cap going up, some team will throw some serious money his way. If he were to somehow sign the withe Steelers, it won't be to play C.

Starks is another guy that I doubt comes back. The thought of him being the starting LT is also a scary one.

I just don't see this scenario playing out at all.

Mr. Stiller
01-05-2008, 10:30 AM
then what do we do with mahan? cut him? hes being payed sarter money. if we cut him it would free up some cap room.

He's really not.. 5 yr 3.5M/yr is backup money. Especially for a versatile 3 position backup like Mahan.

mikehop05
01-05-2008, 12:51 PM
I have my doubts about that article.

First and foremost, I doubt Faneca re-signs. With the cap going up, some team will throw some serious money his way. If he were to somehow sign the withe Steelers, it won't be to play C.

Starks is another guy that I doubt comes back. The thought of him being the starting LT is also a scary one.

I just don't see this scenario playing out at all.

starks did a very solid job filling in for smith when smith was out

but i agree about faneca

steelersfan27
01-05-2008, 03:41 PM
He's really not.. 5 yr 3.5M/yr is backup money. Especially for a versatile 3 position backup like Mahan.


backups are being paid 3.5/yr? i need to getup to speed with things.

skarocksoi
01-07-2008, 04:45 PM
The times, they are a changin....

I would love to see Faneca back and could easily wave the long goodbye to Smith and bring Starks back. I hope Starks can continue his recent play as a starter and isnt just benefiting from his time on the bench. I like that Oline though, could be very solid.

Mr. Stiller
01-08-2008, 10:39 PM
backups are being paid 3.5/yr? i need to getup to speed with things.

Yeah.

Starters are getting 7/7per.