PDA

View Full Version : WR's?


Jakey
01-31-2008, 06:49 AM
Which 'big' WR would you want us to draft if they were available? Take into account the projected round aswell...thanks guys.

Jakey
01-31-2008, 07:08 AM
I like all of these WR's, but i am going to assume that we dont go in that direction untill at least round 3. I found it hard to choose between Hall and Bowman...but i eventually sided for Hall...he runs good routes, has dependable hands, and is a good deal faster than Bowman.

Thunder&Lightning
01-31-2008, 07:19 AM
Gotta go with sweed for the steelers. Wasnt it Big Ben that made ward mad while saying he wanted a big athletic receiver. Steelers already have 2 quick smaller WRs. Sweed will give them the size they need and make there QB happy.

Santonio10
01-31-2008, 10:47 AM
I like hardy, bowman, and sweed. If i had to pick one it would be hardy altough i dont think we would draft him in the first round, and i dont think he would fall to us in the second. His stock is probably gonna soar at the combine as i heard he runs in the low 4.4s. not to mention hes 6'7"

terribletowel39
01-31-2008, 11:15 AM
this is too hard dude. i want either Sweed, Thomas, or Hall of the three. I'd probably vote Sweed just cuz i have small ties to texas, me living here and what not, but i've seen Hall everytime LSU played them. and he is a specimen, and Thomas noone really knows that much because he is a one year wonder so far and well Michigan St doesn't get too much national spotlight.

mikehop05
01-31-2008, 11:17 AM
bowman most bang for the buck imo

Mr. Stiller
02-04-2008, 12:17 AM
Limas Sweed is Horrible.. who would vote for him.

terribletowel39
02-04-2008, 12:20 AM
Limas Sweed is Horrible.. who would vote for him.
whats your knock on him??

Mr. Stiller
02-04-2008, 12:21 AM
whats your knock on him??

He's slow, not very agile, routes are average.

And for how high his stock is you can get 10x better receivers.

Give me Hardy, Thomas, Kelly or Bennett over that schmuck.

DeathbyStat
02-04-2008, 06:28 AM
I went thomas....added value as a kick returner

Hines
02-09-2008, 09:21 AM
No Kennan Burton?

Jakey
02-09-2008, 09:26 AM
I was gonna put Keenan Burton on there, i really like the kid...but he doesnt really class as a big reciever, which is the question i asked.

That said, he does jump about 10 inches higher than every1 else, so he has the same effect as a tall reciever :p

Hines
02-09-2008, 09:55 AM
I would rather have that then some slouch tall reciever. Burton has it all except for straight line speed. If he had the speed, he would be a first rounder. I could use a second or third on him.

Sniper
02-09-2008, 10:01 AM
I hope you guys don't take Adrian Arrington. I don't want his awesomeness on the Steelers!

Hines
02-09-2008, 10:04 AM
If I had to chose someone, I chose Thomas, but he wont be available for when we pick in the second. You also forgot Earl Bennett.

JoeSixPac
02-09-2008, 04:47 PM
If we can't get good value for the o-Line in the first we should get hardy. he would be a beast on jump balls. jordy nelson and limas sweed would also be good choices.

skarocksoi
02-09-2008, 06:41 PM
Either Hardy or jump on the RB train with all the talent that is out there.

I cant see there not being a good OT out there to take in the first round.

Mr. Stiller
02-09-2008, 07:24 PM
If we can't get good value for the o-Line in the first we should get hardy. he would be a beast on jump balls. jordy nelson and limas sweed would also be good choices.

James Hardy struggled to get of the LOS from jams (even against smaller college DB's.)

I don't want Hardy.

ChosenOne
02-17-2008, 03:15 AM
Devin Thomas in round two. We have too big a need for offensive linemen in the first round to take a receiver.