PDA

View Full Version : A healthy, Limas Sweed or Malcolm Kelly?


katnip
04-03-2008, 04:09 PM
Who would you rather have, or who do you think will make a bigger impact in the NFL?

Me, I'd rather have Kelly.

Is this in the right section? They'll both be NFL players pretty soon.

terribletowel39
04-03-2008, 04:10 PM
How is you would rather have both a logical answer?? And this is in the wrong section. I voted Sweed.

katnip
04-03-2008, 04:12 PM
How is you would rather have both a logical answer?? And this is in the wrong section. I voted Sweed.

Ok, mods move then this to the right forum.

princefielder28
04-03-2008, 04:16 PM
I'm not a Limas Sweed fan so I go with Kelly

katnip
04-03-2008, 04:20 PM
Wait a second. Is that thread about Kelly's knees being bad true? Its in the nfl draft forum section.

toonsterwu
04-03-2008, 04:20 PM
Depends. If you are looking for a West Coast receiver, then Kelly is the better option. If you are looking for a vertical guy, then Sweed would be my pick.

no love
04-03-2008, 04:23 PM
I'll take a hurt wrist over a bum knee any day.

JagHombre22
04-03-2008, 04:47 PM
I think Sweed will be the better pro...so I voted for him

Go_Eagles77
04-03-2008, 04:58 PM
I used to like Kelly as the #1 receiver until I found out about all his knee problems, so if they are both 100% healthy I take Kelly.

Flyboy
04-03-2008, 10:43 PM
I prefer Sweed.

holt_bruce81
04-04-2008, 01:27 AM
I'll take Malcolm Kelly everytime.

brat316
04-04-2008, 01:36 AM
Depends is it Healthy Sweed vs. Bum kness Kelly then Sweed. If they are both healthy then Kelly

Dam8610
04-04-2008, 01:37 AM
With both healthy, it's close, but with the concern about Kelly's knees, it's Sweed in a no brainer.

Packman1957
04-04-2008, 09:41 AM
If Kelly didn't have those injury problems, he would probably be the best WR in this class. So I would pick Kelly. But with that not being the case, considering Kelly's knee problems, I would take Sweed over Kelly.

ChezPower4
04-04-2008, 04:31 PM
I would take Kelly just think that he's a better playmaker but IMO i don't really think that you could go wrong with ethier one.

Vikes99ej
04-04-2008, 04:35 PM
Sweed, please, even though we have our own Sweed in Sidney Rice.

TheGreatEscape
04-04-2008, 04:52 PM
Perfectly healthy Kelly has to be the pick unless your completely offense is vertical as Kelly's only slightly worse as a deep threat but significantly better after the catch and over the middle.

TheBuffaloBills
04-04-2008, 05:47 PM
I am not sold on either one of them. Being a Bills fan, were probably going to take one or the other. I still havent made my decision. However we have taken risks on guys with bad knees before (McGahee)

sprawwl
04-05-2008, 07:24 PM
I prefer Sweed; I just think he's got a little better skillset.

BlindSite
04-05-2008, 08:31 PM
After seeing Javon Walker's career dip massively since he busted his knee.

I'm going with Sweed.

art vandelay
04-06-2008, 09:31 PM
Kelly. Sweed's inability to get separation REALLY scares me. I do not think he will be a good pro.

BaLLiN
04-06-2008, 09:42 PM
Kelly. Sweed's inability to get separation REALLY scares me. I do not think he will be a good pro.

yea thats exactly why i like Kelly, although Sweed is a better red zone threat, so his stats TD wise will probably be better