PDA

View Full Version : Mock Draft 4/5/08


cdobry1991
04-05-2008, 06:43 PM
1 Dolphins Chris Long DE Virginia
2 Rams Jake Long OT Michigan
3 Falcons Matt Ryan QB Boston College
4 Raiders Darren McFadden RB Arkansas
5 Chiefs Glenn Dorsey DT Louisiana State
6 Jets Vernon Gholston DE Ohio State
7 Patriots Mike Jenkins CB South Florida
8 Ravens Leodis McKelvin CB Troy
9 Bengals Sedrick Ellis DT USC
10 Saints Keith Rivers LB USC
11 Bills Limas Sweed WR Texas
12 Broncos Ryan Clady OT Boise State
13 Panthers Chris Williams OT Vanderbilt
14 Bears Malcom Kelly WR Oklahoma
15 Lions Rashard Mendenhall RB Illinois
16 Cardinals Dominique Rodgers- Cromartie CB Tennessee State
17 Vikings Derrick Harvey DE Florida
18 Texans Aqib Talib CB Kansas
19 Eagles Jeff Otah OT Pittsburgh
20 Bucs Devin Thomas WR Michigan State
21 Redskins Desean Jackson WR California
22 Cowboys Jonathan Stewart RB Oregon
23 Steelers Branden Albert OG Virginia
24 Titans Felix Jones RB Arkansas
25 Seahawks Kenny Phillips S Miami (FL)
26 Jaguars Phillip Merling DE Clemson
27 Chargers Gosder Cherilus OT Boston College
28 Cowboys Reggie Smith CB Oklahoma
29 49ers Antoine Cason CB Arizona
30 Packers Brandon Flowers CB Virginia Tech
31 Giants Dan Connor LB Penn State

Cashmoney
04-05-2008, 06:45 PM
The Titans will not choose a RB in the first round. We've spent a second rounder on a RB the past two years. The only way I see us taking RB is if there isn't value at the WR or DE spot and Jonathan Stewart falls to us.

Abaddon
04-05-2008, 06:46 PM
Dorsey over McFadden, all day. BPA on the board and a huge need. It just makes sense.

NEtimehester
04-05-2008, 06:48 PM
No way do the bears draft a WR in round 1.

RaiderFan
04-05-2008, 07:05 PM
Dorsey over McFadden, all day. BPA on the board and a huge need. It just makes sense.

Did'nt McFadden run Circles around Dorsey Twice? At what point does McFadden get his BPA status back? The 4.27 isn't good enough?


Great Pick
Keep giving the Raiders McFadden we need his Offense sorely

cdobry1991
04-05-2008, 07:13 PM
Dorsey over McFadden, all day. BPA on the board and a huge need. It just makes sense.

So McFadden runs a 4.27 and that's not enough? Isn't RB a need for Atlanta as well? And no matter how good your defense is, don't you need an offense, which McFadden would improve, as well?

And why wouldn't Chicago pick a WR? Sure, they have Hester, but he's mainly a kick returner. They just lost Berrian to a division rival and they are probably in the market for a replacement for him.

KCJ58
04-05-2008, 07:15 PM
Giants fans will not be happy with you, but I personally Love Dan Connor

proshoota25
04-05-2008, 07:18 PM
pretty good patriots pick

Yung Flippa
04-05-2008, 07:22 PM
Good Baltimore & Houston picks.

regoob2
04-05-2008, 08:13 PM
Yikes, not loving the bears pick.

LonghornsLegend
04-05-2008, 08:51 PM
NO...please stop giving us Stewart, we will not draft him, he is exactly like Barber and were looking for a contrast, a guy who can run outside with blazing speed...Chris Johnson, Felix Jones, and Charles would all be better picks, but preferably Johnson...we are not going to take Stewart.

Bills2083
04-05-2008, 09:07 PM
good pick for Buffalo

Abaddon
04-05-2008, 09:15 PM
Did'nt McFadden run Circles around Dorsey Twice? At what point does McFadden get his BPA status back? The 4.27 isn't good enough?


Great Pick
Keep giving the Raiders McFadden we need his Offense sorely

So McFadden runs a 4.27 and that's not enough? Isn't RB a need for Atlanta as well? And no matter how good your defense is, don't you need an offense, which McFadden would improve, as well?

1. What does a 40 time have to do with how good a player is? Dumbest argument possible.

2. No. Atlanta does not need a RB. They signed Michael Turner to a large contract.

3. Oakland's offensive troubles have nothing to do with their ground game. They run the ball quite well. Ranked 6th or 7th in the league, IIRC.The lack of a passing game and the inability of the defense to stop the run or get off the field on 3rd downs, now that's a problem. Dorsey addresses the defense's ineptitude. McFadden upgrades a ground game that's already strong. But so would a dozen other backs available well after the 1st round.

And, again, we didn't re-sign Fargas and restructure Rhodes just to burry them, and Michael Bush, on the depth chart. To suggest otherwise is just foolish.

McFadden makes no sense for the Raiders. Chris Long, Dorsey, Gholston, and Ellis make total sense.

vidae
04-05-2008, 09:49 PM
Decent Chiefs pick.

SaintsFanForLife
04-05-2008, 10:15 PM
Im ok with Rivers.

msealy2
04-05-2008, 10:24 PM
Great Vikes pick.

Dr. Gonzo
04-05-2008, 10:37 PM
Menardo!!!!!!!!!!!!!you Are Up In The Forum Mock!!!!!!!!pick Or You Will Be Skipped!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Menardo75
04-05-2008, 10:38 PM
Not a good 9ers pick corner is not that big of a need groves or cherilous

JagHombre22
04-05-2008, 10:39 PM
forum mock now
!!!!!

thebow305
04-05-2008, 11:22 PM
great phins pick!

G-Men88
04-06-2008, 01:53 AM
Awful Giants pick

gdamac
04-06-2008, 05:13 AM
I would prefer Dorsey or Gholston, but wouldn't complain.

T-RICH49
04-06-2008, 08:42 AM
LOVE the Chiefs pick

BaLLiN
04-06-2008, 10:59 AM
Dan Connor doesnt fit the giants scheme

Matthew Jones
04-06-2008, 11:02 AM
Hate the Patriots pick. Jenkins has no consistency, desire.

Gay Ork Wang
04-06-2008, 11:03 AM
Bears have so many bigger holes + Kellys injury = no Kelly

Thunder&Lightning
04-06-2008, 01:16 PM
nice chargers pick

cdobry1991
04-06-2008, 10:11 PM
Bears have so many bigger holes + Kellys injury = no Kelly

such as...

their WR core seems depleted to me. Kelly might not be the pick, but they should take a WR, if not round 1, soon after that.