PDA

View Full Version : Throwing away money: Studying running backs with blockbuster deals


Matthew Jones
08-26-2008, 08:16 PM
Throwing away money: Studying running backs with blockbuster deals

Today I decided to conduct a study of all running backs (to my knowledge - I'm pretty sure I covered most of them) who, in the last few years, have received a large contract (over $20 million, or $5 million per season), and what they have done since receiving that contract. And it's not pretty. Some teams should be very, very afraid. That includes Atlanta (Michael Turner), Philadelphia (Brian Westbrook), and St. Louis (Steven Jackson.) The results are as follows:

Jets RB Thomas Jones

Is considered to be potentially in line to be replaced if he can't find the end zone or up his yards per carry.

Signed a four-year, $20 million extension with New York after being traded.

Year before contract: 296-1210-6 (4.1 ypc)
Year after contract: 310-1119-1 (3.6 ypc)
Now: N/A
Years earned contract: 1/1, three years remaining

The verdict: incomplete, not looking good.

Patriots RB Corey Dillon

Helped New England win a Super Bowl after being aquired in a trade, but did not return to the form shown in his first season.

Signed a five-year, $25 million extension with New England after 2004 season.

Year before contract: 138-541-2 (3.9 ypc)
Year after contract: 345-1635-12 (4.7 ypc)
Now: N/A, retired
Years earned contract: 3/5, retired

The verdict: success, as the Patriots won a Super Bowl.

Bengals RB Rudi Johnson

Is being shopped for a wide receiver, and appears a long shot to make the team's roster after an awful 2007 season.

Signed a five-year, $26 million extension with Cincinnati after 2005 season.

Year before contract: 337-1458-12 (4.3 ypc)
Year after contract: 341-1309-12 (3.8 ypc)
Now: 170-497-3 (2.9 ypc)
Years earned contract: 1/2, three years remaining

The verdict: incomplete, not looking good.

Ravens RB Jamal Lewis

Awarded a large three-year deal after a disappointing 2005, bounced back in 2006, but is no longer with team.

Signed a three-year, $26 million contract with Baltimore after 2005 season.

Year before contract: 269-906-3 (3.4 ypc)
Year after contract: 314-1132-9 (3.6 ypc)
Now: 298-1304-9 (4.4 ypc) (with Cleveland)
Years earned contract: 1/3, no longer with team

The verdict: failure, less than half of contract fulfilled.

Ravens RB Willis McGahee

After a big trade that landed him in Baltimore, McGahee signed a big contract and the jury is still out on him.

Signed a seven-year, $40.1 million contract after the 2006 season.

Year before contract: 259-990-6 (3.8 ypc)
Year after contract: 294-1207-7 (4.1 ypc)
Now: N/A
Years earned contract: 1/1, six years remaining

Texans RB Ahman Green

Signed a big deal with Houston last year and immediately was injured after a few mediocre games, fighting with Steve Slaton for a job.

Signed a four-year, $23 million contract with Houston after 2006 season.

Year before contract: 266-1059-5 (4.0 ypc)
Year after contract: 70-260-2 (3.7 ypc)
Now: N/A
Years earned contract: 0/1, three years remaining

The verdict: incomplete, almost certain failure.

Texans RB Domanick Williams

Signed what was then a massive contract with the Texans but has since been unable to make it onto a team's roster.

Signed a four-year, $22 million contract after 2004 season.

Year before contract: 302-1188-13 (3.9 ypc)
Year after contract: 230-976-2 (4.2 ypc)
Now: Free agent
Years earned contract: 0/4, no longer with team

The verdict: failure, failed to fulfill expectations any year.

Broncos RB Travis Henry

Was considered a prize catch and someone that would put Denver over the top. They failed to make the playoffs and he was released.

Signed a five-year, $22.5 million contract after 2006 season.

Year before contract: 270-1211-7 (4.5 ypc)
Year after contract: 167-691-4 (4.1 ypc)
Now: Free agent
Years earned contract: 0/5, no longer with team

The verdict: failure, already released from team.

Chargers RB LaDainian Tomlinson

Signed a large contract with the Chargers after the 2004 season - is considered an all-time great, but still without a ring.

Signed an eight-year, $60 million contract after the 2003 season.

Year before contract: 313-1645-13 (5.3 ypc)
Year after contract: 339-1335-17 (3.9 ypc)
Now: 315-1474-15 (4.7 ypc)
Years earned contract: 4/4, four years remaining

The verdict: success, is one of the best NFL running backs.

Chiefs RB Priest Holmes

Signed a four-year deal worth at least $20 million after a number of successful seasons, then battled injuries and is retired.

Signed a four-year, $20+ million contract after 2002 season.

Year before contract: 313-1615-21 (5.2 ypc)
Year after contract: 320-1420-27 (4.4 ypc)
Now: 46-137-0 (3.0 ypc), retired
Years earned contract: 2/4, no longer with team (retired)

The verdict: success, followed up extension with record season.

Chiefs RB Larry Johnson

Was considered to be one of the top running backs in the league after monster 2006, but struggled in 2007 battling injuries.

Signed a six-year, $45 million contract after the 2006 season.

Year before contract: 416-1789-17 (4.3 ypc)
Year after contract: 158-559-3 (3.5)
Now: N/A
Years earned contract: 0/1, five years remaining

The verdict: incomplete, not looking good but could turn around.

Raiders RB LaMont Jordan

After the 2004 season, signed a deal with the Raiders, only to struggle after one season and is now with New England.

Signed a five-year, $27.5 million contract after the 2004 season.

Year before contract: 93-479-2 (5.2 ypc)
Year after contract: 272-1025-9 (3.8 ypc)
Now: 144-549-3 (3.8 ypc)
Years earned contract: 1/5, no longer with team (New England)

The verdict: failure, one good season out of a potential five.

Giants RB Tiki Barber

After 2004 season, signed a two-year extension (for 2007 and 2008) and retired after two seasons, before the Giants won the Super Bowl.

Signed a two-year, $12+ million extension after the 2004 season.

Year before contract: 357-1860-9 (5.2 ypc) (year before extension)
Year after contract: 327-1662-5 (5.1 ypc)
Now: N/A, retired
Years earned contract: 1/2, retired

The verdict: success, put together a solid final season.

Redskins RB Clinton Portis

Is considered to be one of the NFL's better running backs, but not as good as he was in Denver after being traded for Champ Bailey.

Signed an eight-year, $50.5 million contract after the 2003 season.

Year before contract: 290-1591-14 (5.5 ypc)
Year after contract: 343-1315-5 (3.8 ypc)
Now: 325-1262-11 (3.9 ypc)
Years earned contract: 3/4, four years remaining

The verdict: success, although maybe not exactly what they wanted.

Panthers RB Stephen Davis

After a then-record nine-year, $90.75 million contract in 2000 (which he completely failed to honor), Davis signed with Carolina and failed.

Signed a 4-5 year deal worth an estimated $3 million per year after the 2002 season.

Year before contract: 207-820-7 (4.0 ypc)
Year after contract: 318-1444-8 (4.5 ypc)
Now: N/A, retired
Years earned contract: 1/4-5, retired

The verdict: failure, but did play well in Super Bowl season in 2003.

Cardinals RB Edgerrin James

Signed a four-year deal with Arizona after three straight solid seasons with the Colts and has seen his production dip.

Signed a four-year, $30.5 million contract after the 2005 season.

Year before contract: 360-1506-13 (4.2 ypc)
Year after contract: 337-1159-6 (3.4 ypc)
Now: 324-1222-7 (3.8 ypc)
Years earned contract: 2/2, two years remaining

The verdict: success, has done a good job considering.

49ers RB Kevan Barlow

After outplaying Garrison Hearst, received a big extension, which he then played his way out of almost immediately.

Signed a five-year, $20 million contract after the 2003 season.

Year before contract: 201-1024-6 (5.1 ypc)
Year after contract: 244-822-7 (3.4 ypc)
Now: 131-370-6 (2.8 ypc) (New York Jets)
Years earned contract: 0/5, no longer with team (Steelers)

The verdict: failure, although it wasn't as big a deal as some.

49ers RB Frank Gore

Has shown no ill effects from his two torn ACLs in college and has become one of the better running backs in the league.

Signed a four-year, $28 million contract after the 2006 season.

Year before contract: 312-1695-8 (5.4 ypc)
Year after contract: 260-1102-5 (4.2 ypc)
Now: N/A
Years earned contract: 1/1, three years remaining.

The verdict: incomplete, but it was looking good before Martz.

Seahawks RB Shaun Alexander

After winning the league MVP award, signed a huge deal with the Seahawks, which they're probably regretting right now.

Signed an eight-year, $62 million extension after the 2005 season.

Year before contract: 370-1880-27 (5.1 ypc)
Year after contract: 252-896-7 (3.6 ypc)
Now: 207-716-4 (3.5 ypc) (Free agent)
Years earned contract: 0/8, no longer with team

The verdict: failure, miserable seasons since extension.

In conclusion, only a few players (Dillon, Portis, James, and Tomlinson) completely lived up to expectations, while a number (Holmes, etc.) helped out for a short amount of time. The rest flamed out. So unless you know you're getting an elite player without too much tread on his tires, I'd say avoid the running backs, people. I have been outspoken in the past around my college and high school against giving running backs large extensions, and this seems like a pretty good indicator that most players just can't keep up their performances. Running backs have short shelf lives, so it's better to draft one early if you can, than to risk it all on someone who's been a workhorse in the past. If I forgot any running backs who have signed a big deal in the last five years, let me know! Obviously, I didn't include Jackson, Westbrook, etc. because they have not played with their new contracts yet.

EDIT #1: Added Ravens RB Willis McGahee.
EDIT #2: Added 49ers RB Kevan Barlow.
EDIT #3: Added 49ers RB Frank Gore.

Xonraider
08-26-2008, 08:25 PM
Do you think it has much to do with the fact that they signed a contract over that amount of money?

Matthew Jones
08-26-2008, 08:27 PM
Do you think it has much to do with the fact that they signed a contract over that amount of money?

I think it could be that they're not taking risks and are just playing it safe because they received their big pay day already. Either that, or they've just taken too much of a beating beforehand.

neko4
08-26-2008, 08:38 PM
I cant believe Alexander got that big of a contract, are your numbers 100% correct?
Thats just a horrible deal for Seattle

Matthew Jones
08-26-2008, 08:39 PM
I cant believe Alexander got that big of a contract, are your numbers 100% correct?
Thats just a horrible deal for Seattle

Yup, he signed that deal after the record-breaking 28(?) touchdown season.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/football/261869_shaun06.html

619
08-26-2008, 08:41 PM
It's the NFL, everyone pretty much is on a one-year deal .

bigbluedefense
08-26-2008, 08:41 PM
theres very few RBs in this league worth extending past their rookie contract. very few.


its just too easy to replace them for a fraction of the cost. and the RBC is the way to go anyway. its all about the oline.


I personally wouldn't mind us not resigning Jacobs. Not worth it. Esp since we find mid round/undrafted gems all the time.

bored of education
08-26-2008, 08:43 PM
Is their any correlation with camp hold outs, and failure the next year? anything. This just shows age catches up with people lol. Nothing to do with money, to an extent.

bored of education
08-26-2008, 08:43 PM
Btw, most of these RBs are solid or have had a solid year or two. That is more you can say about 75% of the Rbs that stepped on the field/or drafted.

bigbluedefense
08-26-2008, 08:45 PM
i think its age/toll on their body more than anything. usually these contracts that fail are awarded to RBs who had their best years behind them.

BeerBaron
08-26-2008, 08:45 PM
I think its further evidence that capable RB's can be found in the mid-late rounds of the draft and you should instead invest your high draft picks and FA dollars into building an o-line for them to run behind.

Matthew Jones
08-26-2008, 08:56 PM
Also, only five backs in the top twenty in rushing yards last year received a blockbuster deal previous (not counting rookie deals): Tomlinson (#1), Portis (#6), James (#7), McGahee (#8), Jones (#10). I didn't count Jamal Lewis since he wasn't still on the contract.

Xonraider
08-26-2008, 10:24 PM
theres very few RBs in this league worth extending past their rookie contract. very few.


its just too easy to replace them for a fraction of the cost. and the RBC is the way to go anyway. its all about the oline.


I personally wouldn't mind us not resigning Jacobs. Not worth it. Esp since we find mid round/undrafted gems all the time.

And there's Ahmad Bradshaw too...

BlindSite
08-26-2008, 10:30 PM
theres very few RBs in this league worth extending past their rookie contract. very few.


its just too easy to replace them for a fraction of the cost. and the RBC is the way to go anyway. its all about the oline.


I personally wouldn't mind us not resigning Jacobs. Not worth it. Esp since we find mid round/undrafted gems all the time.

I tend to agree, it is a maddenism, but serviceable backs seem to grow on trees. If you draft one, sign them to a 5 or 6 year deal and if they get 1,000+ yards for 4/5 of those years in a starting role you should let them walk. Its not worth the cap hit for spending a draft pick or two in the early and late rounds.

I'd has at a guess and think that if you correlated the FA backs of the last 3 or 4 years that got big contracts with the rookies drafted in the same year, they (the FA's) signed those deals the rookies would be equal or above the FA's production.

Smooth Criminal
08-26-2008, 10:50 PM
Not sure how much Willie Parkers deal is for but he signed a 5 year deal a while back, I'd guess it is over 20 million.

MetSox17
08-27-2008, 08:42 AM
A lot of those guys signed deals on the back end of their careers. It's really not their fault that they've broken down and been failures. A team should know how to spend their money wisely, and not invest in 27, 28 year old running backs. Clinton Portis and LaDainian Tomlinson are successes because they got paid while they were still young and productive.

princefielder28
08-27-2008, 08:57 AM
A lot of those guys signed deals on the back end of their careers. It's really not their fault that they've broken down and been failures. A team should know how to spend their money wisely, and not invest in 27, 28 year old running backs. Clinton Portis and LaDainian Tomlinson are successes because they got paid while they were still young and productive.

I was just going to point that out; by the time year two and three roll around the majority of these backs are hitting that magicial 30 number and production falls drmatically

Matthew Jones
08-27-2008, 09:28 AM
Not sure how much Willie Parkers deal is for but he signed a 5 year deal a while back, I'd guess it is over 20 million.

To my knowledge that Parker extension was for five years and (if I remember correctly), $16.2 million or so.

Matthew Jones
08-27-2008, 09:29 AM
Whoops. That Parker deal is four years, $13.6 million. A steal for the Steelers (har, har.)

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06243/717767-66.stm

MasterShake
08-27-2008, 09:50 AM
Money well spent:

Frank Gore - 5 years, 25 million.

MetSox17
08-27-2008, 02:37 PM
Money well spent:

Frank Gore - 5 years, 25 million.

One of the few smart things the 9ers have done in recent memory.

I'd actually take this strategy towards the signing of RB's more often. If they prove they can be productive at this level, sign them long term, especially if they're playing on non-first round contracts. That way by the time they're deteriorating, you've developed a solid backup and you can afford losing his production, yet still be efficient.

Smooth Criminal
08-27-2008, 03:36 PM
Whoops. That Parker deal is four years, $13.6 million. A steal for the Steelers (har, har.)

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06243/717767-66.stm

That really is a steal. I'm suprised its that low.

Jughead10
08-27-2008, 05:06 PM
Always better off spending money on the O-line than it is on a RB. I don't think it has anything to do with players taking it easy after they get their big deal. RB in most cases just isn't a smart position to invest a ton of money in.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
08-27-2008, 05:26 PM
I would personally only sign a runningback to a big contract that expires by the time they're 30. Any time after that is dead weight on the cap.