PDA

View Full Version : who would u rather have


Hines
03-03-2007, 11:31 AM
napolean harris
ed hartwell
or tully bunta cain

DeathbyStat
03-03-2007, 12:14 PM
Tully Banta Cain best 3-4 OLB

mikehop05
03-03-2007, 12:50 PM
honestly none,

free agent pool is garbage this year and people are over paying like crazy, i hope we do not take part in that

ive always like ed hartwell though, if he can come back from that bad injury

Mr. Stiller
03-03-2007, 12:52 PM
Tully Banta Cain best 3-4 OLB

What?

Antwan Peek would be better if he didn't get signed and Banta-Cain is looking as if he's going to be the hybrid DE/OLB for St. Louis.

Smooth Criminal
03-03-2007, 01:27 PM
I'd like Cain out of those 3 guys.

Hines
03-03-2007, 01:51 PM
id honestly take any of those three. those were the top linebackers available after joey and adalis

TheGunShow
03-03-2007, 03:42 PM
napolean harris
ed hartwell
or tully bunta cain

If I had to choose Napoleon Harris. Can play OLB or ILB and would at vert least give some depth. But Porter and Thomas are head and shoulders above anyone out there at OLB. Maybe bring in Antwan Peek for a minimal one year contract to see if he can turn things around. Looked like he was coming around in 2005 in the 3-4. But the draft is probably where we'll go and have Harrison start next year.

Smooth Criminal
03-03-2007, 04:00 PM
Peek signed with Cleveland I think.

Hines
03-03-2007, 04:46 PM
how much would the three that i picked out cost probably

Man_Of_Steel
03-05-2007, 02:36 PM
none
If i had to chose, Hartwell

Mr. Stiller
03-05-2007, 11:01 PM
Napoleon Harris. Cheap, would know Tomlins 4-3 Schemes (When we use them) and he's solid. Where as Banta Cain could have been a product of NE(With how much $$ they have and depth at LB an issue, why didn't they even attempt to keep him?).

But truthfully none. But having to choose? Harris.