Warhawk
03-05-2007, 08:26 AM
Wasn't sure if this belonged in the NFL section or not, so I'm playing it safe and posting it here.
I thought I'd direct people to an article on CHFF regarding writer Ron Borges of the Boston Globe, and certain similarities in his most recent article to an article by Mike Sando of the Tacoma News Tribune, written over a week earlier.
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Artic...1357&Category=1 (http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=1357&Category=1)
Here's an example of the similarities:
From Borges' Article: (http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/03/04/seahawk_is_a_better_catch/), 4th paragraph
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team's offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract, but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
From Sando's Article: (http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/6389428p-5698815c.html), 18th paragraph
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team’s offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
As a student, if an essay of mine had something like this (and in several other places, as you can read about in the CHFF article), I'd be pretty much screwed. Lets see what the Boston Globe has to say about it.
I'm sure Patriots fans won't feel too bad about losing Borges, though, as the guy has admitted on the radio to having a personal vendetta against Bill Belichick. I think I, as a Colts fan, could probably be a more objective writer.
I thought I'd direct people to an article on CHFF regarding writer Ron Borges of the Boston Globe, and certain similarities in his most recent article to an article by Mike Sando of the Tacoma News Tribune, written over a week earlier.
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Artic...1357&Category=1 (http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=1357&Category=1)
Here's an example of the similarities:
From Borges' Article: (http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/03/04/seahawk_is_a_better_catch/), 4th paragraph
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team's offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract, but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
From Sando's Article: (http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/6389428p-5698815c.html), 18th paragraph
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team’s offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
As a student, if an essay of mine had something like this (and in several other places, as you can read about in the CHFF article), I'd be pretty much screwed. Lets see what the Boston Globe has to say about it.
I'm sure Patriots fans won't feel too bad about losing Borges, though, as the guy has admitted on the radio to having a personal vendetta against Bill Belichick. I think I, as a Colts fan, could probably be a more objective writer.