PDA

View Full Version : What is Derrell Jackson worth?


crazyisme
03-07-2007, 01:59 PM
Id say a late 3rd or 4th round pick. I already posted this in the discussion thread, but i like what the jets and bears did, we could swap 2nd rounders with seattle to get Jackson and that would put jackson as a mid-late 3rd round pick which is fine with me

Severe Punishment
03-07-2007, 02:56 PM
He's worth a high 2nd to us ...and probably a low 2nd /3rd to most of the rest of the league....disgruntled WR's don't command very much because there's no guarentee that their "new team" will make them happy either.
Just ask Denver and Dre' Bly.

yo123
03-07-2007, 05:33 PM
i'd give up a late 1st- early second. I think people underrate him.

Crazy_Chris
03-07-2007, 05:56 PM
No way id give up a first for him or a early second a late second or early third would be the most i offer

Vikes99ej
03-08-2007, 10:46 AM
I would give a second rounder for him. Jackson is underrated in my opinion. He has had 3 seasons over 1,000 yards, and he almost reached it last year.

wogitalia
03-08-2007, 11:11 AM
I wouldnt give up much at all. Disgruntled guys from other teams are not what we need. Joe Horn would have been perfect for us. DJ would be a good pickup for a 5th rounder.

I also wouldnt mind the old draft pick swap. Moving down and picking up a good WR is a nice idea.

Man_Of_Steel
03-08-2007, 11:12 AM
A third would be without question the most i give for him.

VikesRule
03-09-2007, 05:07 PM
A third would be without question the most i give for him.

I agree. He doesn't have the most reliable hands, he'd be a good fit here. ;)

Severe Punishment
03-10-2007, 01:29 PM
His hands are fine, he's got great speed and he is a lower top tier WR.
He'd probably put up 60 catches and 8td's.

His only question mark(to me) is durability.

Tubby
03-10-2007, 01:30 PM
We wont trade him for less than a first day pick

The Dynasty
03-10-2007, 01:42 PM
We wont trade him for less than a first day pick

Id do a 3rd for him which is first day so.

Severe Punishment
03-10-2007, 02:11 PM
We wont trade him for less than a first day pick

I'm sorry Tubby but you can't make a statement like that unless you actually work for the Seahawks. You can say you don't think, or you don't feel, or you believe...but don't state your opinion as fact.
(I'm the only one allowed to do that on here ..lol)

Vikes99ej
03-10-2007, 03:34 PM
We wont trade him for less than a first day pick

That's fine. I'd give up a third or fourth for him easily. If we got him, I think we could look at something other than a reciever with our second round pick, and maybe get a reciever with the 3rd or 4th (whichever one we don't trade).

Crazy_Chris
03-10-2007, 05:45 PM
Yea having him would open up a lot of options come draft day

crazyisme
03-18-2007, 11:26 AM
actually I disagree, i think we still take a guy like Jason Hill in the 2nd round, how much better would that make our WR core?

Darrell Jackson
Jason Hill
Bobby Wade
Troy Williamson

id actually be fairly excited about that group....

Severe Punishment
03-18-2007, 12:13 PM
Jason Hill to me is a 3rd rounder...he ,Aundrae Allison, and Craig Davis are my top 3 guys in the 3rd if we go.... Landry / Quinn / Okoye in the first and then Anthony Spencer / an OT in the 2nd.

MP123
03-18-2007, 12:23 PM
I think he's worth a third round pick. He isn't an elite wide receiver, but he's a very solid one. When healthy, he'll get you 1,000+ yards receiving.

MP123
03-18-2007, 12:26 PM
actually I disagree, i think we still take a guy like Jason Hill in the 2nd round, how much better would that make our WR core?

Darrell Jackson
Jason Hill
Bobby Wade
Troy Williamson

id actually be fairly excited about that group....

Your receiving core sucks. You have two first rounders in Troy Williamson and Travis Taylor and they still can't get the job done. You also had another first rounder in Koren Robinson and he couldn't overcome his alcoholism.

Severe Punishment
03-18-2007, 12:47 PM
Travis Taylor is an UFA who most likely won't be resigned. Koren
Robinson for us was everything we asked of him (he was an All Pro kick returner) and wasn't our 1st round pick (we got him from Seattle).

However I agree with the "your WR corp sucks" comment....of course
pointing out the glaring obvious isn't that hard to do.

secondeye
04-08-2007, 11:10 PM
Id say a late 3rd or 4th round pick. I already posted this in the discussion thread, but i like what the jets and bears did, we could swap 2nd rounders with seattle to get Jackson and that would put jackson as a mid-late 3rd round pick which is fine with me

I'd give a 3rd ideally, but swapping 2nds isn't bad at all.. because we're likely gonna take a WR with the 2nd pick anyway.

Jackson should give us at least 2-3 years, and we have a few drafts to replenish WR.