PDA

View Full Version : Vikings player ratings for Madden 10.


General Zod
06-11-2009, 11:09 AM
Here they are, what do you all think?

I myself believe that Greenway and Taylor should have had better ratings. Maybe even Berrian.

http://espn.go.com/videogames/features/madden/madden10?teamId=31

superman8456
06-11-2009, 11:48 AM
EJ Henderson's needs to be way higher. Pat Williams is kind of low.

Gay Ork Wang
06-11-2009, 12:12 PM
thats because the changed the rating system

Addict
06-11-2009, 12:19 PM
wow no quarterback above 69 overall? that seems harsh

yo123
06-11-2009, 12:24 PM
AD needs to be a 99, and EJ is waaaayyyy too low.

I have no problems with our QB's sucking, although Rosenfels should be low 70's.

General Zod
06-11-2009, 12:27 PM
thats because the changed the rating system

I guess I did hear that too, they were going to change it up a bit this year.

Gay Ork Wang
06-11-2009, 12:29 PM
the worst player is 35 now. they changed it alot

the_legend_killer
06-11-2009, 01:29 PM
I'm glad they changed the rating system. I was sick of average at best players being in the low to mid 80's. Although Leber at 66 is quite low, IMO.

The Dynasty
06-11-2009, 02:44 PM
I agree with everything you guys have pretty much said. EJ is way to low but it could be because of the injury last year. Ben Leber is an Average OLB but he deserves to be in the 70's at least. Oh well though, After playing a year with them there rating will go up. Tarvaris may have a bad rating but he is a fun QB to use in Madden.

Geo
06-11-2009, 03:21 PM
AD needs to be a 99.
Then he better work on his ball security and pass protection.

Vikes99ej
06-11-2009, 03:33 PM
Madden sucks something awful. The best versions were in the mid-2000's for PS2 and Xbox.

FuzzyGopher
06-11-2009, 08:27 PM
Tyrell Johnson being higher than Madieu Williams is very strange.

AJHawk50
06-11-2009, 09:13 PM
I guess I did hear that too, they were going to change it up a bit this year.
Yeah they spread it out so you can seperate your elite players vs. the average vs. the sucky.

Now when a star player gets injured and the backup comes in, you aren't supposed to just get a career day...you'll notice you need your other guy back, etc.

BuckNaked
06-12-2009, 05:50 PM
Tarvaris should be atleast a 97

B-rand
06-14-2009, 08:14 PM
I'm just gonna re-state a lot of what has already been said:
- The rating system was changed dramatically for this game, your superstar players are much harder to come by, and your average NFL players rating is now in the high 60's to low 70's
- Leber's overall rating is the one that bothers me the most. This was a very good core of LB's last season, even without EJ, and Leber is a big part of that. He should be in the mid 70's.
- Scratch that, the thing that bothers me most is that Naufahu Tahi is rated the same overall as Chester Taylor!!! Tahi should be the lowest rated player in the game, I'd give him a rating of 3
- Tyrell Johnson above Madieu is strange, I also think that Jimmy Kennedy above Fred Evans is strange.
- Herrera could be a bit higher, but at least they finally got Ryan Cook right! Up until now Cook was rated in the high 80's, above Herrera.
- Even though these rating look really bad, I think this team is poised to prove the nay-sayers wrong, and a good season can turn these rating around quickly. Players like Madieu, EJ, and Sidney Rice are quite low because of injuries last season, playing a full season can help the ratings quickly.

BGB
06-15-2009, 12:26 PM
Wow did anyone notice my boy Harvins physical tools!
Speed 97
Acceleration 98
Agility 99
Strength 57

That's as good as any WR in the game. Now he just needs to get that awarness up and he should be one of the best players in the game!

Crazy_Chris
06-17-2009, 04:46 PM
Tarvaris should be atleast a 97

If any player on the Vikings that deserves a 99 rating it's definatly Tarvaris Jackson. I just don't understand how they came up with that rating they insanely under-rated him.

But seriously Leber is way too low, so is E.J. Henderson, and even Greenway should be a few points higher. But their ratings don't really surprise me as it seems for the past couple of years they always have under-rated the Viking Linebackers.

vikes_28
06-18-2009, 09:37 AM
But their ratings don't really surprise me as it seems for the past couple of years they always have under-rated the Viking Linebackers.

thats because the vikings have been more known for their offense rather than defense in like the last 15 years.

I probably won't buy this game. I sound as a pound with my Madden 08.