PDA

View Full Version : Jason Campbell


GiantRutgersFan
03-09-2007, 09:46 PM
thoughts?

I will spare you mine so I dont come off as a hater

skinzzfan25
03-09-2007, 11:11 PM
Great potential, has everything that you could need in a quarterback, huge arm, poise, NOT FRAGILE, pretty mobile for his size, hes freaking huge, quick learner, CAN BE A LEADER, and probably more.

Don't ask me about Eli, I wouldn't want to come off as a hater ;)

21ST
03-10-2007, 12:48 PM
better than eli

703SKINS202
03-11-2007, 12:01 AM
the best thing i saw in him last year was his poise, doesnt breakdown under pressure and handles game speed well for how young he is

toonsterwu
03-11-2007, 12:07 AM
I think the potential for Campbell is ridiculously high, and this past year, he's shown steps in the right direction. He handled himself fairly well this year, considering the situation, and if the Redskins coach him correctly, and provide him with the weapons, Campbell has all the tools in his arsenal to truly excel and be a quality NFL starter. It's a lot of if's right now, as it is with all young QB's.

703SKINS202
03-11-2007, 01:03 PM
the best thing about his progression is that nationally he is never in talks about young qb's that need to develop, he is overlooked by espn and major networks which i think will help him a lot

NIN1984
03-12-2007, 10:20 AM
He was my favorite QB in that draft and I wanted the Raiders to get him so bad, I think he will turn out just fine.

Madgriffon32
03-14-2007, 11:24 AM
good qb...I wish the Llyod wouldn't have tried tot hrow him under the bus during his radio interviews saying Campbell didnt know the system..it seemed to me Llyod didn't realize on the few occasions Campbell threw to him just how strong his arm is...

Shiver
03-16-2007, 09:32 PM
I am a big Jason Campbell fan. His development is one of the main reasons I have the Redskins as my preliminary pick to win the NFC East this year.

SeanTaylorRIP
03-16-2007, 09:33 PM
I am a big Jason Campbell fan. His development is one of the main reasons I have the Redskins as my preliminary pick to win the NFC East this year.

Plus rep points for you shivy.

critesy
03-17-2007, 02:29 AM
Plus rep points for you shivy.



i think they're going to win too :).

Shiver
03-17-2007, 03:14 AM
Plus rep points for you shivy.

That offense will be explosive. It's the defense that will make or break the year for the Redskins. If they add the necessary pass rushers, I like their chances.

MP123
03-18-2007, 02:24 AM
He looks like he'll be pretty good in the future.

omecool20
03-18-2007, 10:37 PM
What I have seen and read about him, indicates that Skins would do well to utilize his talents. And not screw him up like Patrick Ramsey :-)

But I think he will not be another Ramsey. I look to him to play better this coming season.

bigbluedefense
03-20-2007, 11:39 AM
I like Campbell. I think he's gonna be a fine player. He's partly the reason why you'll probably see the Redskins in my next NFL Truth's thread (in a positive way this time).

I think the Skins will be back next year.

SeanTaylorRIP
03-20-2007, 02:00 PM
I like Campbell. I think he's gonna be a fine player. He's partly the reason why you'll probably see the Redskins in my next NFL Truth's thread (in a positive way this time).

I think the Skins will be back next year.

+ Rep Points.

Eaglez.Fan
03-20-2007, 02:06 PM
I am actually quite scared about facing the Skins next year, a reason is Campbell. Before him QB was my only doubt about the Skins offense, now IMO it's solved. Hopefully Jimmy Johnson will have a nice package for him though :p

boisefan
04-21-2007, 09:09 AM
Looks very poised, and handles pressure great for his lack of experience.
Keep in mind he has great teachers around him, including Mark Brunell.

bigbluedefense
04-21-2007, 12:04 PM
You know whats funny. From a prospect point of view, I don't see anything that Russell brings to the table that Campbell didn't.

Yet in what was a weak qb class, Campbell was the 3rd taken off the board.

So what justifies Russell being worthy of the #1 pick this year? Considering that Quinn is infinitely better than Alex Smith as a prospect? I don't get it.

neko4
04-21-2007, 12:09 PM
Looks very poised, and handles pressure great for his lack of experience.
Keep in mind he has great teachers around him, including Mark Brunell.
I can see where Brunell and COllins have probably helped in some way

boisefan
04-21-2007, 11:16 PM
You know whats funny. From a prospect point of view, I don't see anything that Russell brings to the table that Campbell didn't.

Yet in what was a weak qb class, Campbell was the 3rd taken off the board.

So what justifies Russell being worthy of the #1 pick this year? Considering that Quinn is infinitely better than Alex Smith as a prospect? I don't get it.

I feel the same way, Campbell and Russell are very similer. I believe that the Redskins picked a great future QB, and I think that is what people see most in Russell, a solid QB that can learn fast, and help lead a team soon, to make a quick impact that will last.

bigbluedefense
04-22-2007, 11:09 AM
I feel the same way, Campbell and Russell are very similer. I believe that the Redskins picked a great future QB, and I think that is what people see most in Russell, a solid QB that can learn fast, and help lead a team soon, to make a quick impact that will last.

While Im also a fan of Campbell, let's not make the expectations for him next year to be beyond reality. Truth is, what we saw last year was indication that he will become a solid qb in the NFL. He shows the signs. But he's not gonna be a great QB instantly next year. He, like all other developing qbs, needs 2 more years before you really get to know what he's made of.

I think its gonna be key to develop him the right way this upcoming season and not put too much on his plate. You guys have the oline and RBs to develop him properly, but its up to Saunders to utilize it to its max potential.

Personally, I think Gibbs should run his scheme again and call the plays. I don't like Saunders scheme in Washington, it doesn't fit. Gibbs used Moss much better, and Cooley much better. Its hard to switch schemes now though, because Campbell just got accustomed to the Saunders scheme, which isn't easy to do.

Canadian_draft_fan
04-22-2007, 11:14 AM
While Im also a fan of Campbell, let's not make the expectations for him next year to be beyond reality. Truth is, what we saw last year was indication that he will become a solid qb in the NFL. He shows the signs. But he's not gonna be a great QB instantly next year. He, like all other developing qbs, needs 2 more years before you really get to know what he's made of.

I think its gonna be key to develop him the right way this upcoming season and not put too much on his plate. You guys have the oline and RBs to develop him properly, but its up to Saunders to utilize it to its max potential.

Personally, I think Gibbs should run his scheme again and call the plays. I don't like Saunders scheme in Washington, it doesn't fit. Gibbs used Moss much better, and Cooley much better. Its hard to switch schemes now though, because Campbell just got accustomed to the Saunders scheme, which isn't easy to do.

This is as logical post on the Redskins from a non-fan as I have ever seen. We definitely need to be patient with Campbell for a year or two and be a run oriented team.

boisefan
04-22-2007, 11:19 AM
I agree, he did good for the time he started, but he needs some work still.
And I agree about Saunders offence not fitting the Redskins, but remember, it was the first year of that system, and teams always improve on the second year of a 700+ play system.

bigbluedefense
04-22-2007, 11:25 AM
I think if he incorporates more 2 TE sets and screen passes to Moss, it will be ok.

The issue I have with Saunders scheme is he likes to spread you out with 3 WRs and run in between the nickel fronts. Its very similar to Coughlin's scheme, and Im not sure if thats the best way to develop a qb.

Because when the qb does throw, he's throwing on a nickel front, opposed to 8 in the box the way Gibbs scheme wouldve made it for Campbell.

That obviously, makes it tougher for the qb. With that oline and those RBs, they need to pack it up and run down everyone's throat. Take shots when they need to take em.

Contrary to what others believe, I honestly think the defense will be back next year. People forget how injured this team was last year. I think with a defensive linemen in this draft, this team can play defense/run heavy offense very well next year.

Communication amongst the coaches has to be key though. Last year we saw all the coaches work individually and it left the players confused. There needs to be better communication amongst the coaches.

boisefan
04-22-2007, 11:30 AM
I think if he incorporates more 2 TE sets and screen passes to Moss, it will be ok.

The issue I have with Saunders scheme is he likes to spread you out with 3 WRs and run in between the nickel fronts. Its very similar to Coughlin's scheme, and Im not sure if thats the best way to develop a qb.

Because when the qb does throw, he's throwing on a nickel front, opposed to 8 in the box the way Gibbs scheme wouldve made it for Campbell.

That obviously, makes it tougher for the qb. With that oline and those RBs, they need to pack it up and run down everyone's throat. Take shots when they need to take em.

Contrary to what others believe, I honestly think the defense will be back next year. People forget how injured this team was last year. I think with a defensive linemen in this draft, this team can play defense/run heavy offense very well next year.

Communication amongst the coaches has to be key though. Last year we saw all the coaches work individually and it left the players confused. There needs to be better communication amongst the coaches.

I agree, Gibbs loves the run, and always will. Saunders is willing to stick with the run, but he likes the pass more. Redskins need to stick with the run, with Portis and Betts, we will have 2 great backs that wont get tired from getting too much touches. Use Campbell's arm to get out of some situations, but dont throw the team on his shoulders when we have the oline/RB's to get the job done on the ground.

bigbluedefense
04-22-2007, 11:35 AM
I agree, Gibbs loves the run, and always will. Saunders is willing to stick with the run, but he likes the pass more. Redskins need to stick with the run, with Portis and Betts, we will have 2 great backs that wont get tired from getting too much touches. Use Campbell's arm to get out of some situations, but dont throw the team on his shoulders when we have the oline/RB's to get the job done on the ground.

Absolutely.

And we saw Randle El thrive in a scheme that allows him to use open space from the 8 man front to get open. Moss is so fast, a little hesistation from the CB due to PA pass will get him instant separation and he can be a major deep threat with Campbell's arm.

Couple that with screen passes to take advantage of teams who use deep coverage on Moss, and you really present matchup problems.

Cooley can be a solid Hback in the 2 TE set.

The pieces are in place to do damage. They just have to be used the proper way. Im not sure about Lloyd, that mightve been a mistake. But if a run heavy set with Moss and Randle El as WRs is used, this team can do enough on offense to win games.

boisefan
04-22-2007, 11:41 AM
Lloyd might have been a mistake, but still adds depth to the WR's we have (when he catches the ball). The offence has all the players, they just need to step up and play AS A TEAM. The defence, of course, is another story.
Doug has to step it up this year, and get this D to step up and tackle people.

We all saw what Barber did to us in week 17.

neko4
04-22-2007, 11:45 AM
Whos gonna play the other TE, Sellers?

boisefan
04-22-2007, 12:42 PM
Whos gonna play the other TE, Sellers?

probably, that is the best choice for them.

bigbluedefense
04-22-2007, 01:27 PM
you can use the iform opposed to the 2 TE set, it doesn't necessarily have to be 2 TE. As long as its a run oriented base.

boisefan
04-22-2007, 02:17 PM
you can use the iform opposed to the 2 TE set, it doesn't necessarily have to be 2 TE. As long as its a run oriented base.

true.

besides, who needs to TE anyway? lol