PDA

View Full Version : Michael Vick and Ndamukong Suh


gpngc
01-04-2010, 09:36 PM
That's what I think.

-Dome
-Rookie QB likely means more losing in the upcoming season
-Decent running-game, OL should be improved, he adds another dimension
-WRs aren't exactly stars, would work better with a dual-threat/improviser/super hero QB than deer-in-headlight rookie

Thoughts?

Todd Bertuzzi
01-04-2010, 09:38 PM
Vick for Gibson?

gpngc
01-04-2010, 09:39 PM
Vick for Gibson?

He is due some crazy roster bonus and in all likelihood will be an UFA I believe.

Todd Bertuzzi
01-04-2010, 09:40 PM
Haha yeah I know I was just messing with you.

NGSeiler
01-05-2010, 12:03 AM
Not a fan of signing Vick.

holt_bruce81
01-05-2010, 04:31 AM
Vick really?

The dude was a horrible passer when he was in Atlanta. He has an average CMP% of 57%, and that was before he missed two years. What is so intriguing about that? Has There been one receiver that's had success with Vick throwing him the ball?

Not thanks. I know it's a big name and people are intrigued, but no.

Scotty D
01-05-2010, 04:38 AM
I've speculated in the Lions thread that the Rams should do this. I really hope it doesn't happen, but Vick + Suh>Bradford/Clausen

brat316
01-05-2010, 05:01 AM
Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.

holt_bruce81
01-05-2010, 04:48 PM
Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.

God I hope not.

Todd Bertuzzi
01-05-2010, 05:08 PM
In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.

Me Likey Rookies
02-20-2010, 05:27 PM
Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).

holt_bruce81
02-20-2010, 08:12 PM
Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).

The goal is to win. If the Rams don't end up signing Vick, I don't think "because he could win us more games and we could lose out on a QB next year" would be the reason.

George Lippard
02-20-2010, 08:32 PM
Not a Rams fan but like Raheem Morris, I think Spags is going to get the player that best improves the Ram's chances this COMING season. He is coaching for his job now.

MikeVickTheSickest
02-22-2010, 01:49 AM
I'm coming to yo team to win da Supa Bowl IMMEDIATELY!

Shahin
02-24-2010, 01:26 AM
In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.

In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows that the Eagles completely misused him.