PDA

View Full Version : who would you rather have on your team THIS YEAR


superman
02-23-2010, 11:40 PM
not thinking about the future and not necessarily starting. CJ Spiller or Reggie Bush?

George Lippard
02-23-2010, 11:46 PM
Spiller, rather easily.

Todd Bertuzzi
02-23-2010, 11:47 PM
Spiller...

Clarkw267
02-23-2010, 11:59 PM
All things being equal with cost and health, I'd go with Bush. Exceptional receiving and return ability, and he finally started to run more physically in the playoffs.

V.I.P
02-24-2010, 12:06 AM
All things being equal with cost and health, I'd go with Bush.

Someone wants some attention...

superman
02-24-2010, 12:22 AM
Someone wants some attention...

why do you say that? it's not a no brainer question. bush hasn't been worth where he was picked by a long shot, but he's a good player. and neither will be every down backs, so receiving is very important.

V.I.P
02-24-2010, 12:37 AM
why do you say that? it's not a no brainer question. bush hasn't been worth where he was picked by a long shot, but he's a good player. and neither will be every down backs, so receiving is very important.

With Spiller you have a guy who might take it the distance every time he touches the ball (homerun threat, and with Bush you just have a pretty good punt returner. lol

K Train
02-24-2010, 12:42 AM
bush was supposed to be that guy too...he isnt, but we do know what he is.

we dont know spiller is going to be, ill take bush and put his ass out wide where he belongs...he scores alot of TDs even if hes not the best RB

SenorGato
02-24-2010, 12:43 AM
Easily Bush.

niel89
02-24-2010, 12:47 AM
I'd take Bush. He at least has proven that he can be effective in certain roles. He is a good return man and a great pass catcher out of the backfield. He also was showing some physicality running too.

V.I.P
02-24-2010, 01:02 AM
Bush is no longer the homerun threat that will all thought he'd be. Spiller is still that homerun threat until he steps on an NFL field, and proves me wrong.

I'd take Spiller over Bush all day.

vikes_28
02-24-2010, 01:05 AM
I would take Bush. I think that Bush is finally getting into the prime of his career. But ultimately I see him not being on the Saints.

RaiderNation
02-24-2010, 01:42 AM
We've seen what Bush can do in the NFL, he is a homerun guy who either is on top his game or is a non factor. Id rather see what Spiller has

AntoinCD
02-24-2010, 01:54 AM
Reggie Bush. He is a proven commodity and you know what your getting and the best situation to put him in. 10-15 touches be it rushing, receiving, returning anddont expect him to carry the load. Spiller may be the same, may be better, may be worse. As for now though give me the proven NFL player

Saints-Tigers
02-24-2010, 03:46 AM
Reggie would look better with more touches. If he's healthy, Bush easy.

LizardState
02-24-2010, 05:41 AM
Spiller, younger legs.

Razor
02-24-2010, 05:54 AM
I'd take Spiller. His explosiveness, acceleration and agility is unreal! I was shocked that Scott didn't have him as an elite prospect, especially with a similar player (Chris Johnson) dominating in the NFL.