PDA

View Full Version : NEW MOCK FA update*


bucfan12
03-11-2010, 02:19 PM
Trades: Denver trades WR Brandon Marshall to Seattle for the 14th overall pick.

Baltimore trades 3rd and 4th round picks to Arizona for Anquan Boldin and 5th round pick

1. St. Louis- Sam Bradford QB Oklahoma
2. Detroit- Ndamukung Suh DT Nebraska
3. Tampa Bay- Gerald McCoy DT Oklahoma
4. Washington- RUssel Okung T Oklahoma State
5. Kansas City- Eric Berry S Tennessee
6. Seattle- Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame
7. Cleveland- Sergio Kindle OLB Texas
8. Oakland- Bruce Campbell T Maryland
9. Buffalo- Trent Williams T Oklahoma
10. Jacksonville- Jason Pierre Paul DE S. Fla
11. Denver- Dez Bryant WR Oklahoma State
12. Miami- Rolando McClain ILB Alabama
13. San Fransisco- Earl Thomas S Texas
14. Denver*(f/Seattle)- Dan Williams NT Tennessee
15. New York Giants- Sean Weatherspoon LB Missouri
16. Tennessee- Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech
17. San Fransisco- CJ Spiller RB Clemson
18. Pittsburgh- Joe Haden CB Florida
19. Atlanta- Brandon Graham DE Michigan
20. Houston- Kyle Wilson CB Boise State
21. Cincinatti- Brian Price DT UCLA
22. New England- Jared Odrick DE/DT Penn State
23. Green Bay- Bryan Bulouga T Iowa
24. Philadelphia- Taylor Mays S/OLB USC
25. Baltimore- Devin McCourty CB Rutgers
26. Arizona- Anthony Davis T Rutgers
27. Dallas- Mike Iuputti G/T Idaho
28. San Diego- Ryan Matthews RB Fresno State
29. New York Jets- Golden Tate WR Notre Dame
30. Minnesota- Patrick Robinson CB Florida State
31. Indianapolis- Charles Brown T USC
32. New Orleans- Carlos Dunlap DE Florida

ROUND 2:

33. St. Louis- Arrelious Benn WR Illinois
34. Detroit- Vladimir DUcasse G/T Massachussetts
35. Tampa Bay- Demaryious Thomas WR Georgia Tech
36. Washington- Maurice Pouncey G/C Florida
37. Kansas City- Brandon Spikes ILB Florida
38. Seattle- Jason Fox T Miami
39. Cleveland- Kareem Jackson CB Alabama
40. Oakland- Everson Griffen DE USC
40. Buffalo- Colt McCoy QB Texas
41. Miami- Jerry Hughes OLB TCU
42. Tampa Bay- Amari Spievy CB Iowa
43. New England- Brandon Lafell WR LSU
44. Denver- Corey Wooten DE Northwestern
45. NY Gaints- Navaro Bowman OLB Penn State
46. Carolina- Damian Williams WR USC
47. New England- KOA Misi OLB Utah
48. San Fransisco- Kyle Calloway T Iowa
49. Kansas City- Terrance Cody NT Alabama
50. Houston- Jonathon Dwyer RB Georgia Tech
51. Pittsburgh- Roger Saffold OG/T Indiana
52. New England- Rob Gonroski TE Arizona
53. Cincinatti- Chad Jones S LSU
54. Philadelphia- Nate Allen FS S. Fla
55. Green Bay- Jhavid Best RB California
56. Baltimore- Aaron Hernandez TE Florida
57. Arizona- Eric Norwood OLB S. Car.
58. Dallas- Rashad Jones S Georgia
59. Daryl Washington ILB TCU
60. San Diego- Tyson Alleu DE Cal
61. NY Jets- George Selvie OLB S. Florida
62. Minnesota- Sean Lee LB Penn State
63. Indianapolis- Geno Atkins DT Georgia
64. New Orleans- Arthur Jones DT Syracuse

DiG
03-11-2010, 02:26 PM
4. Washington- RUssel Okung T Oklahoma State
36. Washington- Maurice Pouncey G/C Florida


Okung is the way to go in the first round. I like Pouncey although I might prefer Saffold. If the Skins draft Pouncey to start at guard then Im fine with that but having resigned Rabach at C, I like Saffolds ability to play RT or Guard more than Pounceys flexibility at center and guard.

It might be hard to pass on Everson Griffin though for either. He'd look good across from Orakpo.

proshoota25
03-11-2010, 02:32 PM
not a spectacular pats draft, solid players, but no real impact guys. i hope this wouldnt be the case.

vidae
03-11-2010, 02:33 PM
Decent KC draft but we have to address C/G in the first three picks. Pouncey over Spikes please.

wicket
03-11-2010, 02:43 PM
like the saints draft

Jerry's World
03-11-2010, 03:30 PM
Way to early for Amari Spievy he would be in the 4th round where he is projected and we could get him there. Give us Nate Allen, Eric Norwood, or George Selvie.

prock
03-11-2010, 03:38 PM
Don't like the Vikes mock. Both were reaches.

Grizzlegom
03-11-2010, 03:54 PM
FA update but miami is still taking mcclain? Great second round pick though!

RealityCheck
03-11-2010, 03:54 PM
Meh Pats draft, two reaches that are way off.
But I love me some Odrick.

twizbuck
03-11-2010, 04:15 PM
I really like the Bengals draft, but Nate Allen would be a better pick over Chad Jones IMO.

MikeTeel
03-11-2010, 04:22 PM
Clausen to Marshall all day errr day

I don't think Seattle is going to take a tackle just for the sake of taking a tackle. We have Locklear who is capable of playing LT if he has too, and Ray Willis on the right side (even though he's miscast in a ZBS, we've yet to see Gibbs' variation though) and they'll only take one if its a clear upgrade, which I'm not sure Fox is. Id prefer Gerhart there in round 2 to get the power run game going like Carrol wants, but you don't even have him in the 2nd so I geuss you don't like him enough. Dwyer or Griffen would be fine.

billsfootball15
03-11-2010, 04:22 PM
the only thing good about this Bills draft is that u didnt give us Tebow...

wheres Bryan Bulaga???? He should be the Bills 1st rd pick.

Matthew Jones
03-11-2010, 04:31 PM
not a spectacular pats draft, solid players, but no real impact guys. i hope this wouldnt be the case.

I agree with this. I think it's just a case of drafting a bunch of average starters, although you did hit the needs.

AkiliSmith
03-11-2010, 04:41 PM
With Tank re-signed the Bengals have 3 good defensive tackles. No reason to burn a 1st on a 4th.

twizbuck
03-11-2010, 04:44 PM
With Tank re-signed the Bengals have 3 good defensive tackles. No reason to burn a 1st on a 4th.

We have two NT's and a lack of a pass rush, Tank or no Tank.

Price would make for a nice pick at that point.

AkiliSmith
03-11-2010, 04:46 PM
We have two NT's and a lack of a pass rush, Tank or no Tank.

Price would make for a nice pick at that point.
Sims is an UT and so is Tank

Why would they draft an UT in round 1 after giving Tank a 4 year deal?

twizbuck
03-11-2010, 04:52 PM
Sims is an UT and so is Tank

Why would they draft an UT in round 1 after giving Tank a 4 year deal?

Because you can never have too much talent in your front 7, and I've never known Sims as a UT. Maybe he can play at times, but he's better suited at NT.

CJSchneider
03-11-2010, 04:57 PM
like the saints draft

Agreed, although I would personally switch Dunlap with Griffen.

AkiliSmith
03-11-2010, 04:58 PM
Because you can never have too much talent in your front 7, and I've never known Sims as a UT. Maybe he can play at times, but he's better suited at NT.
Sims has always been an UT. He was drafted as an UT. I think he played NT when Peko went down and that's the only time.

You don't draft a #4 DT in the 1st round. It's not a realistic pick now that Tank is re-signed.

twizbuck
03-11-2010, 05:24 PM
Sims has always been an UT. He was drafted as an UT. I think he played NT when Peko went down and that's the only time.

You don't draft a #4 DT in the 1st round. It's not a realistic pick now that Tank is re-signed.

Then what do we draft? A WR that won't see time? A TE that won't be used? Pray and hope Earl Thomas or Taylor Mays are there?

Teams do this often, especially 3-4 teams. Might as well join the arms race.

DenverJetsFan
03-11-2010, 05:28 PM
Duuude im saying this on everyones mock drafts.... there is no way the broncos take a defensive tackle in the first round.... our D-Line is set for next year i think Bryan Bulouga would even be a better pick

AkiliSmith
03-11-2010, 05:34 PM
Then what do we draft? A WR that won't see time? A TE that won't be used? Pray and hope Earl Thomas or Taylor Mays are there?

Teams do this often, especially 3-4 teams. Might as well join the arms race.
A WR that won't see time isn't a bad thing. WR's take time to develop and now that Bryant is signed we can afford to draft one to develop because the need isn't as great.

No tight end. Hell no to Mays. Earl Thomas will be a Texan.

I think Iupati is an option as well. Maybe Sergio Kindle.

BaLLiN
03-11-2010, 05:41 PM
if we're drafting two LB's itd be Spoon and an ILB, my sig states what id like

thebow305
03-11-2010, 07:15 PM
We don't need McClain any longer after the Dansby signing, so give us Earl Thomas there instead. Then I would rather have Terrence Cody in the 2nd round over Hughes, although Hughes would work there as well.

619
03-11-2010, 07:17 PM
Best. Mock. Ever.

Okay, maybe not, but I like it. :)

summond822
03-11-2010, 07:57 PM
Clausen to Marshall all day errr day

I don't think Seattle is going to take a tackle just for the sake of taking a tackle. We have Locklear who is capable of playing LT if he has too, and Ray Willis on the right side (even though he's miscast in a ZBS, we've yet to see Gibbs' variation though) and they'll only take one if its a clear upgrade, which I'm not sure Fox is. Id prefer Gerhart there in round 2 to get the power run game going like Carrol wants, but you don't even have him in the 2nd so I geuss you don't like him enough. Dwyer or Griffen would be fine.

Locklear cannot play LT. We saw that this last year when he was letting pass rushers through every other play.

As for the draft, Clausen is understandable.
Marshall will improve our passing game, but if management is smart they won't give up a first rounder for him.
I don't like Fox there, and reaching for a guy because it's a huge need is a mistake. Griffen is probably the pick there instead, and fills just as big of a need.

MikeTeel
03-11-2010, 09:09 PM
Locklear cannot play LT. We saw that this last year when he was letting pass rushers through every other play.

As for the draft, Clausen is understandable.
Marshall will improve our passing game, but if management is smart they won't give up a first rounder for him.
I don't like Fox there, and reaching for a guy because it's a huge need is a mistake. Griffen is probably the pick there instead, and fills just as big of a need.

Thats what I'm saying though, Locklear would be better than Fox at LT so there is no point to drafting a tackle at that point. I think you're being too hard on Locklear though. Not every team has an elite LT, his production wan't that bad all things considered.

marshallb
03-12-2010, 11:09 AM
Don't like the Vikings mock. Both players are reaches and neither are at our biggest needs of QB, S, NT, OG, or RB. CB may slot into there alongside OG, but I think it's down below RB.