View Full Version : mock 3.0
Bengals1690
03-16-2007, 10:07 AM
http://www.mymockdraft.com/MyDraft/Bengals1691.aspx
tell me what you think.
T-RICH49
03-16-2007, 10:39 AM
Mebane over Thomas for KC in RD 2 ad Duckworth over Harris in the 3rd.LOVE the 1st round pick though
BIG Country
03-16-2007, 10:52 AM
Terrible second round pick for Carolina. A starting Safety is the #1 priority.
hugegmenfan
03-16-2007, 10:57 AM
very good giants draft- cept for in the 3rd round give us a guy like ryan harris over steve smith cuz we need oline badly
briz5x
03-16-2007, 11:28 AM
i like, great pats picks.
Slasher28
03-16-2007, 12:22 PM
very good giants draft- cept for in the 3rd round give us a guy like ryan harris over steve smith cuz we need oline badly
and we're not sure if one of our RGs are switching, so Harris is the pick
hosler427
03-16-2007, 12:26 PM
I can't see Peterson lasting to #12. Someone would trade up if he is available.
Im_a_Romosexual
03-16-2007, 12:40 PM
NO TE TO THE COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!
good draft otherwise
Tha rizzock
03-16-2007, 12:40 PM
raiders dont need a RB and meachem will not slide to#30
BoltHype
03-16-2007, 01:33 PM
raiders dont need a RB and meachem will not slide to#30
reggie wayne slipped to 30 :O
dhoe20
03-16-2007, 02:01 PM
Perfect Giants draft.
Brutal Bucs draft, just plain awful. I'll give it a Z, and that's being generous. So bad I won't even bother to explain.
Crazy_Chris
03-16-2007, 03:08 PM
not so good vikings mock... The Vikes would take Laron Landry Or Amobi Okoye both before we would take Jammal Anderson. The seond Round pick is good but in the third Give us Ryan harris, or Manuel Ramirez rather than Doug Free if we go O-line.
bernbabybern820
03-16-2007, 03:46 PM
RAIDERS MOCK-D.
you only got the first pick right.
we have Moss, Porter, and Curry.
we have Rhodes and Jordan.
draftguru151
03-16-2007, 03:53 PM
Good first two round picks. SS isn't much of a need. Stanton would be a better pick there.
Bengals1690
03-16-2007, 04:47 PM
Brutal Bucs draft, just plain awful. I'll give it a Z, and that's being generous. So bad I won't even bother to explain.
well than, i will take the time to explain the picks to you then. Alan Branch is the best available pick there with CJ gone, plus their defensive line is getting old. Same with Aaron ross, behind Ronde there are no quality starters. Derrick Brooks can't last forever, and his play is starting to drop, which is why they take Bradley. Their only go to reciever is getting older, and higgins has upside through the roof. If you are going to criticize, at least explain what you would do better.
Bengals1690
03-16-2007, 04:49 PM
RAIDERS MOCK-D.
you only got the first pick right.
we have Moss, Porter, and Curry.
we have Rhodes and Jordan.
Porter and Moss hate Oakland, neither want to play there, and there is a good chance they will be traded.
Rhodes has never stood out as a franchise back, and Jordan just really hasn't came out as a dominant back. plus, Irons is the BPA.
princefielder28
03-16-2007, 04:49 PM
Give GB Irons in round 3
Bengals1690
03-16-2007, 04:51 PM
Terrible second round pick for Carolina. A starting Safety is the #1 priority.
show me a safety worth taking at their pick in the second round.
Caddy
03-16-2007, 05:19 PM
Give the Bucs Joe Thomas or Gaines Adams in the first. You really need to address DE and S.
Lee Evans83
03-16-2007, 05:22 PM
Other than not giving the BILLS their secons third round pick that they got from the Ravens that draft is amazing for the BILLS
49erfaithful
03-16-2007, 05:41 PM
not a great SF draft. In R2 we need WR then a ILB over a OLB in R3
RaiderNation
03-16-2007, 05:48 PM
bad raider draft. we just signed rhodes so a rb isnt a need now. if we go wr in the first couple rounds it would be CJ or if jarrett falls to us. good pick as of now in the 1st.
Chucky
03-16-2007, 10:46 PM
joe thomas over branch no question
gdamac
03-17-2007, 01:49 AM
good Raider draft, give us Ben Patrick in the 3rd though, we don't need a RB
Xonraider
03-17-2007, 01:56 AM
Porter and Moss hate Oakland, neither want to play there, and there is a good chance they will be traded.
Rhodes has never stood out as a franchise back, and Jordan just really hasn't came out as a dominant back. plus, Irons is the BPA.
You have no idea of what you are saying.
Porter is in good terms with the team, he likes coach Kiffin and is excited to play under and for him. He even changed his jersey number to get a fresh start. Moss is the one who dislikes being Oakland and is probably going to be cut or traded. But I do agree with Rice and IŽd love it.
Irons was a terrible pick. We are paying Rhodes big cash to share carries with LaMont. He is a very good back, and it was a nice acquisiton, but we overpayed a little too much. We already have 2 highly payed RBs, Justin Fargas who was good last season, Zack Crockett and Justin Griffith at Fullback, and both serve as short yardage runners, too. There is absolutely no room for a running back in Oakland.
eaglesalltheway
03-17-2007, 10:02 AM
The Eagles wouldn't take a WR or QB on the first day, especially now that we signed Curtis. We would go either DE or LB in the first in this situation and SS in the second with Weddle or Wendling. In the third, we would use the pick on LB or CB.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.