PDA

View Full Version : Adam Archuleta


GiantRutgersFan
03-17-2007, 03:07 PM
he might not be a bad pickup. he is supposedly on the cut block.



Could probably plug him in at FS instead of Demps. Or keep him at SS.

SeanTaylorRIP
03-17-2007, 03:08 PM
They are both slow and get burnt frequently but Will Demps gets burnt less frequent.

Damix
03-17-2007, 03:16 PM
I really question your football intelligence sometimes

ricky bobby
03-17-2007, 03:31 PM
Ken Hamlin. He is still young and is much better than Archuletta. I believe he is the best Safety FA on the market, and has not yet been signed. He had two INTs vs. the giants last year, and I think he'd be an upgrade over Demps. I think he's only 25 or 26 years old.

bigbluedefense
03-17-2007, 05:04 PM
Adam Archulletta could be decent in a Cover 2. But thats about it. No way in Hell do I want him in a Giants uniform. The last thing we need is another SS who can't cover. We already have 2 of those.

hugegmenfan
03-17-2007, 06:41 PM
ya no way i want him- hes worse than gibril and demps- he cant catch and doesnt make plays
hes not fast and would not b an upgrade and would require a lot of money

Number 10
03-17-2007, 07:10 PM
Arch is worse than Demps.

End of discussion.

Slasher28
03-17-2007, 10:24 PM
Ken Hamlin. He is still young and is much better than Archuletta. I believe he is the best Safety FA on the market, and has not yet been signed. He had two INTs vs. the giants last year, and I think he'd be an upgrade over Demps. I think he's only 25 or 26 years old.
Totally agree

BigBlue58KiperIII
03-18-2007, 12:41 AM
Archuleta sucks, but i am a big fan of Hamlin, but dont think we need to spend on him. I dont think we have a NEED at safety. Would it be nice to upgrade, sure, but Demps and Gibril aare more than capable back there compared to our other holes at CB and LB and even LT where we have unproven players

GiantRutgersFan
03-18-2007, 01:21 AM
Arch doesnt suck. He had a bad year, no doubt, but are you forgetting that he was good? He got a huge contract and not cause he sucks....

I agree Ken Hamlin would be better and i like him a lot. but it seems like we have no interest in him.

liquidswords
03-18-2007, 01:28 AM
He got a huge contract 'cause the 'skins are stupid. nuff said.

dc4life
03-18-2007, 01:30 AM
Arch doesnt suck. He had a bad year, no doubt, but are you forgetting that he was good? He got a huge contract and not cause he sucks....

I agree Ken Hamlin would be better and i like him a lot. but it seems like we have no interest in him.

Archuletta was horrible. He got a huge contract because the skins overpayed for him like they overpay everyone else. THAT is the only reason he got a huge contract.

moc182
03-18-2007, 04:33 AM
What's better than two in the box safeties who can't cover to save their lives?

Three in the box safeties who can't cover to save their lives.

hugegmenfan
03-18-2007, 12:18 PM
He got a huge contract 'cause the 'skins are stupid. nuff said.

haha right- they try to lock up free agents, despite if they r good or not by throwing money at them undeservably
they gave brandon lloyd a 7 yr contract!!!!

arch sucks- he was not good on st louis- he has worse hands than will allen and couldnt cover any 1
hes not an upgrade wat so ever over wilson or demps. period.
also for the money he would b asking it would b the worst move ever

Slasher28
03-18-2007, 01:26 PM
haha right- they try to lock up free agents, despite if they r good or not by throwing money at them undeservably
they gave brandon lloyd a 7 yr contract!!!!

arch sucks- he was not good on st louis- he has worse hands than will allen and couldnt cover any 1
hes not an upgrade wat so ever over wilson or demps. period.
also for the money he would b asking it would b the worst move ever
We have two alright safeties, Wilson is better than arch and demps might be better than arch. We don't need to add another old and worn out safety

BigBlue58KiperIII
03-18-2007, 02:50 PM
GRF- Archuleta wasnt that good in St. Louis, he was overrated, he is a LB playing safety and has no coverage skills whatsoever, which is if we going to get aa safety, what we would need to improve on. He wouldnt help this team.

dhoe20
03-18-2007, 05:05 PM
Wouldn't the skins take a huge cap hit if they cut Archuleta?

Curse of Tiki
03-18-2007, 07:13 PM
No No Non On Onononononnononononon

Damix
03-18-2007, 07:21 PM
Adam Archulletta could be decent in a Cover 2. But thats about it. No way in Hell do I want him in a Giants uniform. The last thing we need is another SS who can't cover. We already have 2 of those.

Cover 2 LBer at a guess?

scottyboy
03-18-2007, 08:00 PM
i honestly cant believe this thread is still going about Adam Archuleta

BaLLiN
03-20-2007, 06:40 PM
dealt to bears for 6th round draft choice, he's worth that

Slasher28
03-20-2007, 08:10 PM
I think they could've gotten a 5th for him

Hurricane Ditka
03-20-2007, 08:12 PM
I think they could've gotten a 5th for himIt's a conditional 6th in 2008, if he does well it'll bump up to a 5th.