PDA

View Full Version : Madden Ratings


jetsfan3
03-17-2007, 10:10 PM
QB: Pennington-86
RB: Jones-90
RB:Washington:85
WR: Coles-93
WR: Cotchery-87
LT: Ferguson-89
LG: Kendall-88
C: Mangold-92
RG: Moore-84

DE: Ellis-89
NT: Robertson-85
DE: Van Ohelhoffen-12
OLB: Thomas-92
ILB: Vilma-93
ILB: Barton-87
OLB: Hobson-84
CB: Dyson-85
CB: Miller-84

KR: Miller-99
PR: Miller-99 (If he's 99 at kicks, he's 99 at punts)

K: Nugent-91
P: Graham-88

derza222
03-17-2007, 11:16 PM
KVO at 12 just made my day. I think you have Washington, Coles, and Cotchery all a tad high. Washington will probably be more mid-high seventies, Cotchery low-mid eighties, and Coles somewhere in the 88-91 range. Thomas should be high eighties, Vilma and Barton each 2-3 lower, and Hobson 1-2 higher actually. Miller will be lower at corner as well. Overall I think everything was pretty close I just think as homers we all tend to think our players are a little better than everyone else does. I think Washington, Cotchery, Thomas, and Vilma will all prove to have the ratings you gave them and have those ratings if not a little higher in Madden 09, and everyone else will be in the range I said they will be. Just my opinions though.

MP123
03-18-2007, 02:21 AM
QB: Pennington-86
RB: Jones-90
RB:Washington:85
WR: Coles-93
WR: Cotchery-87
LT: Ferguson-89
LG: Kendall-88
C: Mangold-92
RG: Moore-84

DE: Ellis-89
NT: Robertson-85
DE: Van Ohelhoffen-12
OLB: Thomas-92
ILB: Vilma-93
ILB: Barton-87
OLB: Hobson-84
CB: Dyson-85
CB: Miller-84

KR: Miller-99
PR: Miller-99 (If he's 99 at kicks, he's 99 at punts)

K: Nugent-91
P: Graham-88

From what I saw of Mangold last season, he looked very good. However, I don't think he'll be a 92 overall. I think he'll be an 89 max.

jetsfan3
03-18-2007, 10:55 AM
KVO at 12 just made my day. I think you have Washington, Coles, and Cotchery all a tad high. Washington will probably be more mid-high seventies, Cotchery low-mid eighties, and Coles somewhere in the 88-91 range. Thomas should be high eighties, Vilma and Barton each 2-3 lower, and Hobson 1-2 higher actually. Miller will be lower at corner as well. Overall I think everything was pretty close I just think as homers we all tend to think our players are a little better than everyone else does. I think Washington, Cotchery, Thomas, and Vilma will all prove to have the ratings you gave them and have those ratings if not a little higher in Madden 09, and everyone else will be in the range I said they will be. Just my opinions though.

Well in the next gen updated rosters, Washington was an 84 or so, and Cotchery an 85. What can I say, I just put KVO where he belongs.

derza222
03-18-2007, 02:31 PM
I'm surprised Washington was that high. He is a very talented back though, I'd love to see what he can do behind a line that can run block...

Non_Sequitur
03-18-2007, 03:20 PM
Ellis only an 89? That makes me a saaaad paaaanda.

Naked Jehuty
03-20-2007, 09:37 PM
I think the only thing off is Thomas. The 90's are usually for DE/OLBs with either over 100 tackles or double digit sacks. And mangold is a little high 87-89 is a little better. but thats nitpicking, pretty acurate IMO.

jetsfan3
03-20-2007, 09:39 PM
Ellis only an 89? That makes me a saaaad paaaanda.

Haha, great episode. I didn't want to turn the Jets into an all-star Madden team.