PDA

View Full Version : One Man's Day 1 Take


toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 06:36 PM
Day 1. Day 2 is still being touched up, although there's some things about day 1 I wasn't too big on, with some falls. Give me time to post this up, please. Used Adam JT13’s guesses at the compensatory, due to his track record at doing this stuff. No trades, although I’m hoping to eventually get one up with trades within the next couple weeks. Rest of the order is based on www.gbnreport.com . Certainly a lot of time left and a lot of things that can change.

First Round

1. Oakland Raiders

They’ve had a potentially solid offseason. None of the guys added are long term answers, but they could be solid stopgap measures freeing up options for them in the draft. Rhodes/Griffith should upgrade the backfield and form an intriguing, albeit unknown, trio with Lamont Jordan. Newberry could prove to be a shrewd move inside, and the TE’s added, at worst, still likely are upgrades from what was here before. They lost Langston Walker … which is, um, inconsequential relative to the Langston Walker that played for them. The draft decision is likely to be between the only 2 players I consider “true” elites: Calvin Johnson and Jamarcus Russell, guys that would likely be elite in any year. I do believe one thing, though – I believe they will do what’s best for them long term. That is, I don’t think any trade will play as significant a role as some think. What’s the call? It’s gotten tight, awfully tight. Any closer, and I’d call it a toss up and favor the guy with the momentum, which would be Calvin Johnson. The feeling, though, is still that, as of now, Jamarcus Russell will get the nod. He’s a rare QB talent who brings a skillset (snap, mechanics, and physical ability, in that order) that is unmatched in recent prospect history at the position, with immense, ridiculous upside. Sure, there are valid concerns about him, although the steady growth each year (and no sudden jump) is a positive indicator, along with his in-season development. I believe this is the right move … but if it gets closer, I may have to end up mocking Calvin Johnson. I believe they are building a veteran cocoon on offense in an effort to help a young QB ease in, but in the end, getting a franchise QB may be too good to pass on. Talent wise, they won’t go wrong either way. I do think one thing – Russell won’t fall far, if at all.

Pick: QB Jamarcus Russell, LSU

2. Detroit Lions

I’ll give credit where credits due, and Matt Millen deserves credit this offseason. For all the bashing he gets, much of it valid, he has done a superb job this offseason, shedding players that don’t fit, adding veterans at fairly cheap costs (relatively speaking), and finding guys that fit the scheme potentially, along with the needs. Adding Shaun McDonald, TJ Duckett, Tatum Bell, George Foster on offense potentially gives them answers at positions of concern. Dewayne White and Travis Fisher give them defensive guys that know the scheme and addresses concerns. No significant losses, Holt was nice, but replaceable, Schlesinger and Pollard were both aging. They’ve really opened up their draft options, and I’ll be surprised if they don’t deal. Picking here, though, is tough, wading through the numerous options they’ve thrown out there. I believe Peterson/Quinn to be bluffs, though, in an effort to get a team to move up. In the end, the nod goes to Joe Thomas still, as Foster can slide inside if need be, and shoring up the offensive line is still a concern.

Pick: OT Joe Thomas, Wisconsin

3. Cleveland Browns

What really is Cleveland going to do? I’m not sure anyone has a clear idea … and that’s the way that Savage would like it. I know, a lot of media talk on QB, and it very well could be true. I’d certainly understand the move, as getting franchise QB’s are rare. I have, though, a hard time believing that Savage would let himself get controlled that badly in the process by his owner. Albeit, he is desperate, as this is a make or break year for the entire leadership, so who knows. Some interesting moves this offseason. Jamal Lewis, Seth McKinney, Eric Steinbach may address some key offensive concerns. Antwaan Peek may give them another edge rusher, Kenny Wright adds depth at CB, the Smith’s help the DL. Outside of Steinbach, none of the talents added are likely elite talents anymore, but they are upgrades, which potentially allows them to sit back and go by their board instead of reaching to fill needs. This also allows them to be more receptive to trade downs. Tough call picking here, though. Gut feeling is that they still want Joe Thomas, but he is now off the board. What’s plan B? While I’m not a huge fan of him going top 5, I was thinking Peterson over Quinn. But the dynamics of the Schaub trade makes me rethink this, as it is a small signal that the Texans believe him to go top 3 (because what they gave up for Schaub could move up to the 4th spot). Of course, they might not be high on Quinn, and were just stringing people along. Will be interesting to see how it plays out, but the nod goes back to Brady Quinn here.

Pick: QB Brady Quinn, Notre Dame

4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Busy, busy offseason for another leadership team in a precarious situation. No real significant losses, with Dewayne White being replaced by Kevin Carter. Adding Cato June helps the LB core. Garcia/Petitgout offer veterans at key spots on offense, and ostensibly, are upgrades over what’s there and likely to start. In Petitgout’s case, he allows Davis to slide into a guard role that may fit the him better. Askew is a decent backfield addition that offers more options for them, while Chukwurah and Carter will help a bit defensively, along with perhaps Legree. Sammy Davis was a smart CB gamble to make. No great addition there, by no means, but solid moves that should help in the short term. What’s the nod here? If Calvin Johnson is on board, I believe they’ll be tripping over themselves to send up their draft card. He gives them a big time target, and fills a need, as Clayton’s development has clearly stalled, or perhaps, leveled.

Pick: WR Calvin Johnson, Georgia Tech

5. Arizona Cardinals

They’ve had a quiet, but effective, offseason. They lost Leonard Davis, but it was probably time for each side to move on from that pick. Holt/Hood likely won’t become stud additions, but they are solid options that should be solid depth pieces, if not capable starters. Al Johnson adds a tough interior option that could be real good … if he’s healthy, and replaces Stepanovich in the depth charts, who had lost his job already. I get the feeling these solid potential filler moves may be to free them up to deal up if they can find a good deal. Where do they go in the draft? OL needs help, but with Thomas off, the value isn’t here. Thus, the look is to the defense, and in particular, up front. LB concerns can wait, as this draft is deep in that department. The nod goes to Gaines Adams, giving them the quick pass rusher that should fit Clancy’s system well. He should get some time to slowly work in.

Pick: DE Gaines Adams, Clemson

6. Washington Redskins

Compared to recent history, it’s been a quiet offseason for the Redskins. While I wasn’t a big fan of the London Fletcher-Baker move, it does, though, give depth to a key spot, as Rocky McIntosh waits another year and is a superb 4th LB (at least, that’s my bet … as I think Marshall wins the weakside job). Fred Smoot, at worst, is an upgrade in depth from last year, and at best, could push for a starting spot, depending on what happens. Archuleta was on the outs anyways, so that lost isn’t a big concern, and getting anything, even a 6th rounder, is nice, whenever the pick is (there seems to be mixed reports, although most indicate that it’s this year). Ross Tucker may provide some needed OL depth. One key loss in Derrick Dockery, and they’ll hope Todd Wade is up to the job at guard, but they’ll likely look for more depth, with the 2nd tier FA’s and potential cuts, along with the draft. Relative to the draft, I think the surprise will be if the Redskins are picking at 6. That said, I’m picking here for now. What’s the nod? The focus is likely on the DL, where they could use inside and outside help. My pick hasn’t changed for a month or so. The nod is to Adam Carriker, who gives them the base end they believe they needed, and can slide inside to add to the interior pass rush.

Pick: DL Adam Carriker, Nebraska

7. Minnesota Vikings

A surprisingly quiet offseason so far for the Vikings. No big losses. Napolean Harris likely was going to get ousted this year by Chad Greenway anyways. Smoot leaving was for the better, Whittle and the two Johnson’s were going to be depth pieces. That said, no real big addition. They made an early splash for Visanthe Shiacoe, who could prove to be a solid TE for Childress’ schemes now that he will have opportunities. Bobby Wade is okay, but better suited for the slot role, and Ciurciu is a depth move. What’s the call? Tough decisions if the board falls this way, with Adrian Peterson still hanging around, Jamaal Anderson, Laron Landry, and others still on the board. Jamaal Anderson is just a bit too raw, and they have raw DE talents. He doesn’t give them the immediate pass rushing help they need, IMO. RB isn’t a big need with Chester Taylor as a capable starter and fit. The nod goes to Laron Landry, who is getting a bit overhyped based on the 40 as his quickness numbers weren’t off the charts, and his consistency is not as good as the press clippings suggest (not saying he’s bad, though). Should be a solid safety for a long time, though, and get better with experience, which should correct some of the flaws.

Pick: S Laron Landry, LSU

8. Atlanta Falcons from Houston Texans

And the first big splash is made, with the Falcons/Texans trade that forced me to revamp my first round mock. It had already been a hectic offseason for the Falcons since day 1 due to the coaching change. Petrino brings with him a strong offensive pedigree … but also, a system that’s far different from what they had. Thus, they are in the middle of retooling the lines. So far, the losses they’ve suffered don’t really hurt that much. Kerney was injured last year, and with a new staff, it’s better not to burden them with bad contracts, and signing Kerney to that big a deal would’ve been bad. Plus, they didn’t have the cap space. Losing Lelie doesn’t hurt, due to his inconsistency, and the fact that they have receiving options of similar talent level. Mughelli is a better fit than Griffith in the new system. That said, no great additions either, as Sanders/Wilkins are depth moves, which could be critical, but can’t be construed as impact moves. Fonoti is a huge, literally, question mark, and Horn is a complementary receiver at this stage, although he may provide leadership. Truthfully, their best acquisition will likely be the return of Finneran, giving them the ability to spread and have some steady targets for Vick. Tough call on the route here. While they need help in the trenches, on both sides, and the secondary, a RB like Adrian Peterson might be too good to pass, especially since Peterson’s concerns might be somewhat blunted here on account of the fact that they believe they, despite the changes, seem to be in more of a win now mode. Peterson can ease his way in with Dunn still there, and he gives them the bigger back they desire. With the two seconds now, that’ll be used on the trenches if possible.

Pick: RB Adrian Peterson, Oklahoma

9. Miami Dolphins

One of the toughest early calls to make. Odd offseason, but all in an effort to let Mueller/Cameron make their stamp on the team. The Mare era is over, and Feely is a capable kicker. David Martin and Cory Schlesinger are nothing to get excited over, but offers, in Cory’s case, a lead blocker that Cam likely wanted, and in Martin’s case, depth at TE due to the release of McMichael. Cameron Worrell offers depth, and Joey Porter, they hope, offers them a pass rushing complement to Taylor, letting them push edge talent back a bit in the draft. OL needs some help with McIntosh gone. They’ve lost some offensive depth/skill at RB and WR, namely, Welker, along with leadership defensively with Carter/Zgonina. The nod here is tough, as the rumors suggest Joe Staley is an offensive line target, and much as I like Staley, I have a hard time seeing him work his way close enough to warrant a top 10 pick (doesn’t need to be top 10 grade, just close enough, but I don’t see it). A number of ways they could go here, ranging from defensive line, to secondary, to receiving options on offense. Quinn off the board removes one possibility. Hard to gauge what Mueller’s style is with the draft based on a limited sample size, but the feeling is, he looks for offensive and defensive playmakers early, and fills in with later round picks, but that’s not a conclusive argument. He once took a Tennessee speedster at WR … could he go that route again, or with a LSU WR? In 1997, prior to selecting Walter Jones, he took a CB in Shawn Springs. This team does need secondary help, particularly, if the aging front 7 is to be effective attacking. Darrelle Revis draws some comparisons to Rod Woodson, and Dom Capers may hope that Revis/Allen becomes his Woodson/Lake tandem from yesteryear.

Pick: CB Darrelle Revis, Pittsburgh

10. Houston Texans f/ Atlanta Falcons

They made a huge splash for Matt Schaub, addressing the QB need. Overall, no real big losses this offseason so far, and even if they do lose Vonta Leach, that isn’t really a big loss, although it hurts. They’ve made some intriguing moves that gives them options in the draft. Jordan Black gives them a guy that may be able to step in at tackle for them and start, while Ahman Green gives them a lead back next year, allowing them time to develop Chris Taylor, who they seem to really like. Danny Clark should be a decent LB for them, either as a decent strongside starter, or a good depth LB. Jeff Zgonina is one of those solid veterans that helps the team, and he still has some ability left to be a wave option. A lot of ways they could go in the draft. Secondary help is much needed, as is pass rushing help. They could use another WR, OL depth. Two routes stand out here – WR/DL. Nod goes to the immense upside of Amobi Okoye, who should help with the interior rush.

Pick: DT Amobi Okoye, Louisville

11. San Francisco 49ers

Loaded with picks and coming off a much improved campaign, the Niners are looking to take the next step. Losing Norv Turner doesn’t help, though. That said, they’ve been aggressive in FA. No critical losses, as Davis is here so Eric Johnson’s loss was expected, and Newberry just hasn’t been the healthy enough and they have interior options. Antonio Bryant moving on and being replaced by Ashley Lelie is about equal, although I think Bryant offers more as a WR, but it balances out with his concerns. They’ve gone heavy on the D in the hopes of restructuring it. Franklin gives them a potential starting NT that knows the 3-4, Clements gives them a potential lead corner and gives them depth at that critical spot. Michael Lewis gives them a potential enforcer at safety, and Bockwoldt adds LB depth. Tully Banta-Cain helps on the edges with the pass rush and gives them depth as well. What’s next? A lot of talk about DL by the fans … but I’m not sure if the fits here are worth it. If Carriker is here, that’s different, and should be a consideration. He’s not, though. Anderson doesn’t seem to be a fit due to strength to hold the edge, and Branch I don’t see as a fit for Manusky, but his pro day has knocked him down a bit anyways, IMO. I see three potential areas: ILB, safety, and WR. After further consideration, I’m slowly inching onto this Patrick Willis bandwagon here. I’m not a big fan of Willis, but Nelson/WR were the other options. I’m just not sold on ILB here, though, and I could see them get aggressive and move up for someone (perhaps Landry).

Pick: ILB Patrick Willis, Mississippi

12. Buffalo Bills

Coming off a solid season relative to expectations, the Levy/Jauron team looks to build more. But it’s been an offseason more noted for its departures than acquisitions, making the draft more critical. Losing Clements and dealing McGahee are key losses that has to be dealt with in some fashion. They have added 3 OL pieces in Dockery, Walker, Whittle. It remains to be seen if they were worth what they were paid, but they should help shore the offensive line up, Dockery in particular, provided his performance wasn’t due to his contract year. What’s the nod? While they could use help all over that defense, and in particular at LB, the nod is to Marshawn Lynch. There’s enough depth at their defensive positions of need (LB/CB), and the DT fit isn’t great here. The RB talent drops off a lot after Lynch. He gives them the multifaceted back that could help Losman a lot, as well as being a quality fit for Fairchild’s schemes.

Pick: RB Marshawn Lynch, California

13. St. Louis Rams

Coming off a strong finish after Linehan became more of a head coach as the season progressed, they’ve had a strong offseason. Only loss of significance was Kevin Curtis, but that’s been replaced by Drew Bennett, and it still baffles me that Bennett didn’t get better opportunities/offers. They added McMichael, someone Linehan knows well and an upgrade at the position that can stretch the seams and offer safety valve options. Travis Minor is a versatile RB to have for depth purposes, and Linehan knows him as well. Mike Rumph and Todd Johnson aren’t anything special, but they do add secondary depth, which could be used. Draft isn’t an impact LB, although he could fit well with how Haslett has designed his current scheme and at worst, is a good depth piece to have. James Hall at the cost of a day 2 pick was a smart move, as Hall helps their pass rush potentially, and he could’ve gotten more as a free agent if he had been cut. What to do here? Branch comes to mind, but I can’t help but think that his pro day might not make Linehan too ecstatic about that pick. Furthermore, while Haslett has done different things with his defense before, his current usage suggests that, while he could use Branch, Branch isn’t his prototypical DT. Also, the Rams have struck out with first round DT’s, and still are dealing with Jimmy Kennedy, another big DT that slid a bit for a variety of reasons, some similar to Branch. If not DT, then where? LB is a thought, but current indications would lean against that. There really isn’t a pressing OL need. Two focuses, then. Another DE to develop, or CB, which from what I understand, would get some fans on this board to boo. Brown and Bartell are nice talents, but nothing special, and the potential to land another top CB could allow them to be very aggressive up front. I’ve wrestled this one back and forth, and I’m not going to make Rams friend with this move, I think. But the lean here is towards a CB, with Houston/Hall being in consideration. While Houston’s physical potential is tempting, and while I like Houston better, the nod goes to Leon Hall, who showed better athletic ability than anticipated. Branch might work himself back here as the offseason progresses.

Pick: CB Leon Hall, Michigan

14. Carolina Panthers

Coming off a disappointing year, this is a potentially make or break campaign for John Fox. They’ve had some offensive restructuring, which should bring a different look to things. It’s been a quiet offseason, though, losing no one of consequence and they haven’t added anyone of consequence. Where do they go here? A lot of options. Offensively, WR/TE could come into play, and I wouldn’t rule out OT. Why not? While they liked Wharton, can they depend on him coming off his injury. I know rehab’s on track, but it’s still a risk, and Gross, while a decent LT, is better on the right side. Defensively, they could potentially use an end, a linebacker, and a safety. Safety value is off, though. They are a very close-lipped organization, and gauging plans is tough. The hunch here, though, is that, if Jamaal Anderson is available, they’ll take that gamble. He’s raw and needs development, but this defense is predicated on a dominant DL, and he could be that piece. He’ll go into a good situation, where he should have favorable matchups on account of the surrounding DL talent. There’s been mixed reports on the feelings about Jamaal right now. A day ago, I had him as the 5th pick, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see him go higher.

Pick: DE Jamaal Anderson, Arkansas

15. Pittsburgh Steelers

The coaching change kicked off an intriguing offseason, as they look to make one more run, but slowly transition to what Tomlin expects, from a personnel and scheme standpoint, along with overall structure. I give Tomlin a lot of credit. He’s been very solid at throwing out different options for them in the draft. They’ve lost Porter, but he was on a decline and they have a history of shedding edge talents at the right times. They haven’t gained much, although Mahan isn’t as bad as he’s made out to be. He allows them to not reach for OL, as he can fill in and potentially be a passable-decent starter at center, or more likely, guard, and they have young OL pieces they like. The gut feeling is that, early on, they’ll likely address more immediate needs, with gambles late on transitional pieces. A lot of talk about Timmons here … and maybe he is the nod. Some rumors of a promise given. They could really, though, look anywhere. I’m going to go with a mild surprise, and that is Robert Meachem. That defense should be alright under LeBeau. Getting Rothlisberger going is critical, and since Plaxico left, they’ve been lacking that big, downfield receiver. That’s Meachem’s specialty, and adding him could free up Miller/Ward in the intermediate areas for more advantageous matchups, while aligning Santonio Holmes in different ways to take advantage of his quickness. Maybe I’m crazy on this one.

Pick: WR Robert Meachem, Tennessee

16. Green Bay Packers

After a very good initial campaign under McCarthy, they went into the offseason looking to build up for potentially another one while still focusing on the future at the same time. So far, though, they haven’t made any significant acquisitions, while losing their starting RB. RB is a critical need, and they could be a team to trade up come draft day. Yes, I know Thompson’s history, but he’s also built a strong core and is lacking his playmakers right now. They could use a WR, although that might be addressed with Moss, or it could be addressed later, as Driver/Jennings is a decent-solid tandem anyways. Defensively, they could use secondary help, depth at CB (Chris Houston), and a potential starter at safety. There’s some talk of defensive end, and that bears watching, and Reggie Nelson is a versatile thought. The nod goes to the receiving TE they’ve been searching for, adding a critical weapon for Brett Favre.

Pick: TE Greg Olsen, the U

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 06:36 PM
17. Jacksonville Jaguars

Coming off an inconsistent season, this may be a make or break year for Del Rio, and potentially, Harris as well. They’ve revamped the coaching staff this offseason, and Koetter’s attack might be a better fit for the personnel on hand. One big loss in Deon Grant, in that, that’s a starter spot open. Sensabaugh may get an opportunity there, and they’ll perhaps add another piece. Intriguing and solid additions in Pashos, Northcutt, help, and in Northcutt, likely removes WR as a target here. So what’s the gambit? If they stay here and the board falls this way, the feeling is that they’d look to improve their defensive end group or Reggie Nelson. At DE, three potential guys to discuss: Charles Johnson, Anthony Spencer, Jarvis Moss. If they go DE, the nod would go to Jarvis Moss with his length and physical upside. But the nod goes to the other Florida guy here in Reggie Nelson at safety. Linebacker is a thought, but with Peterson returning, and Smith/Ingram on the outside, plus Greisen has depth, I’m not sold.

Pick: S Reggie Nelson, Florida

18. Cincinnati Bengals

Coming off a disappointing campaign, this probably isn’t a make or break year for Marvin Lewis, but it is a critical season due to the non-football missteps that have plagued this organization. They’ve been quiet this offseason, with a decent move to get Alex Stepanovich, but seeing a lot of guys leave like Steinbach, Simmons, and Kaesviharn, as the main guys. The loss of Steinbach was planned for, and they had a lot of young linebackers, so in terms of physical talent, the loss of Simmons isn’t that bad, although they need someone to fill the leadership void. Kaesviharn and Marcus Wilkins hurt somewhat, due to the situation in the defensive backfield, and Wilkins ST role. Where do they go here? The pick is likely defense. Would they give Branch a thought? I think it isn’t impossible … although I don’t see them going that route, despite it being a good value here if he’s on the board. I’m looking back seven, and targeting Chris Houston at CB or Posluszny, Beason, Timmons at LB. Tough call on where to go. The LB situation is interesting, as Landon Johnson, Rashad Jeanty, and Ahmad Brooks look to be a capable starting trio, with Eric Henderson in the wings. Is it worth it this high? I’m not sure … so the nod goes to Chris Houston at CB. I’d look for them to deal down if something comes along.

Pick: CB Chris Houston, Arkansas

19. Tennessee Titans

Not to underrate what they did last year too much, but if there was any team that overachieved in 2006/2007, it was the Titans. It’s been an offseason where they saw a lot of exits as they let the market settle, with the most critical perhaps being Travis Henry, forcing Lendale White into a lead role. The loss of Bennett/Wade/Smith hurt not because of their talent, but because they needed to upgrade those positions to begin with. They’ve added some pieces of late, with the most critical being Nick Harper, who gives them a 2nd corner to Pacman, if Adam stays, and a solid corner to replace Pacman if he leaves. That creates depth there, with Hill/Finnegan. Fowler is an intriguing acquisition that offers more size inside and someone to compete with Tulloch. Justin Gage was added as a tall target, but really, he’s still raw, despite several years. LB/CB, for now, are probably off the first round target list. Where to? Defensive tackle and end help could be used, and they need to go early for a WR, instead of a usual midround pick. The nod here goes to Alan Branch. It’s a gamble, and they’ve taken gambles on DT’s before (Haynesworth … albeit, their defensive leadership was stronger then). Branch is a risk, but at this stage, it’s worth a gamble. Yes, as of now, I have Branch as a late teens grade. And yes, if he keeps falling, someone like deals up for him, but this was a no-trade. And yes, I do think Branch can rehab his stock … but that’s to be seen. He was an early teens guy for me before the pro day anyways, so it hasn’t been a significant drop. And yes … I might be crazy.

Pick: DT Alan Branch, Michigan

20. New York Giants

It’s been a busy offseason as they go forward in a new direction under Jerry Reese. Couglin hung on … barely, but is facing a make or break year. The addition of Chris Palmer was a nice one, though. It’s a critical year for Eli Manning, but so far this offseason, Palmer’s been the only big move to help. They need a kicker with Feely out. Losing Petitgout, who, when healthy, was arguably their best OL guy, creates questions on who protects Eli’s blindside. Then, there was the Tiki loss, but that was anticipated. They did add Droughns and keep O’Hara. Not a huge fan of Droughns, but if Jacobs is all they hope he is, it could be a decent tandem at RB for them. Defensively, there really isn’t a significant loss, IMO, and I liked the Spagnuolo addition, and potentially, more aggressive defense, and they have some intriguing personnel that could let them get more aggressive. What to do here? Defensively, if there’s an impact tackle, it’s worth consideration. A top man corner is needed, as is a playmaking LB. Offensively, they could use an OT to protect Eli’s blindside. The nod here is to Joe Staley, who I considered with a few teams higher, but couldn’t see it. Yes, Levi Brown is on board, but I think Staley may be a better fit. I just can’t see them going into the year depending solely on Whimper/Diehl protecting Eli’s blindside in such a big year for many. There’s enough depth at LB and CB to wait later.

Pick: OT Joe Staley, Central Michigan

21. Denver Broncos

A disappointing finish to last season doesn’t overshadow the promising start to Jay Cutler’s career. They’ve been busy bees this offseason addressing a lot of areas, particularly, in providing Cutler with a stronger cast, and a veteran cast. There haven’t been significant losses. Travis Henry offers better stability in the run game. Daniel Graham offers a better blocking TE plus an intermediate receiver. Stokely offers a potential veteran depth receiver to go with their top 3 WR’s. Holland offers some OL depth. Ramsey is a veteran backup QB that knows the situation, so there shouldn’t be any significant problems there. Losing Foster/Bell and getting Bly was a nice move on their efforts, as the former two weren’t part of the long range plan. This early in the draft, they’ll likely focus on defense, where the line will get the most attention, but safety is a potential thought, more of a developmental/depth talent, though, then a first round focus. That said, with defensive value, they look that way. They could use some DT help, but the value isn’t here, so the nod goes to an edge guy Jarvis Moss over Anthony Spencer, with Moss being the edge guy for Bates, a la KGB and Jason Taylor.

Pick: DE Jarvis Moss, Florida

22. Dallas Cowboys

The addition of Wade Phillips was a smart move from the perspective of finding a coach that will fit with the personnel, rather than making dramatic changes. As such, the Cowboys can continue their process of pushing forward. Tumultuous offseason in terms of the coaching shifts hasn’t seen a departure of key personnel, though, and they’ve made some nice moves. They shored up the OL with the addition of big Leonard Davis and resigning Marc Columbo. Brad Johnson gives them a veteran QB to go with Jason Garrett in teaching Tony Romo. Where to go in the draft? A lot of mixed signals, with early talk on DB and current talk against. I don’t trust much of what I hear at this time of year. I’m tempted to make a surprise move for Levi Brown here … but Jerry Jones and Wade Phillips are looking at the now, and Levi is a nice move, but not necessary. CB is a big thought, because even if they keep Henry there, they could use young depth. Houston would be the top value. DL depth is for later, and safety value is questionable here, plus they could be landing Ken Hamlin. The nod’s going to be something I haven’t seen much, but Ted Ginn Jr. as a WR to develop, but immediate help in the return game, particular, in punt returns, allowing Newman to focus on his CB duties. I’ll be curious on the response here, and Houston/Brown still nag at me, especially since Flozell Adams has to be replaced in the near future.

Pick: WR Ted Ginn Jr., the Ohio State

23. Kansas City Chiefs

I really get the feeling that they are trying to walk a tightrope, going after one more run while still building towards the future. No real big losses so far, as Black was replaced by McIntosh. Resigning Wilkerson and Ron Edwards, and adding Boone, addresses the defensive line, and the value here would be end anyways, which isn’t a concern for now, although the Jared Allen situation bears watching. Harris and Donnie Edwards upgrade the LB, keeping Keyaron Fox as a backup for another year. Where do they go? CB youth could be added, but probably later. A playmaking WR is a thought, as is more offensive line help. Two intriguing guys on the board with Dwayne Bowe and Levi Brown. The nod goes to the trenches if the value is there, as WR depth is good enough to find talent later. Brown gives them a potential left tackle. If he’s not ready for it yet, they could start him inside as well, or on the right side. Mixed reports on Brown’s value, with some still having him high, so it bears watching to see what happens down the stretch.

Pick: OL Levi Brown, Penn State

24. New England Patriots f/ Seattle Seahawks

Coming off a disappointing AFC Championship loss, they’ve had a busy offseason stocking for a run. Adalius Thomas helps the pass rush, and the interior play as it keeps Vrabel fulltime inside now. He more than ably replaces Tully Banta-Cain. Graham’s role will likely be filled by David Thomas (passing situations) and Kyle Brady (more in on the running situations). Dillon’s role is filled by Maroney, with Sammy Morris as a potential big backup running back. Wes Welker, Kelly Washington, and Donte Stallworth upgrade the passing attack, and fit the scheme. Where to in the draft? Personally, I’ll be surprised if they are here. Maybe they are gearing for one more run, which could lead them to deal up for someone. Or, they had a prudent plan and will deal down to accumulate future picks to protect themselves. We’ll wait and see, but I’ll be surprised if they exercise both first rounders, and personally, I think they might trade completely out of round 1. I’m making a pick, though, and it could arguably be anywhere. They could look for a young edge guy, a young cover ILB, a safety, CB depth, perhaps OL as well if they liked someone (although value makes it less likely). I’m not sure I like it that much, although I like the player, but the nod goes to Jon Beason, who plays bigger than his size, has fluid lateral movement, and gets solid enough in this drops. He’ll be groomed to be their cover/weakside ILB of the future. If they wait or trade down, a player to watch would be Tim Shaw.

Pick: ILB Jon Beason, the U

25. New York Jets

They haven’t been as active as their divisional counterparts in Massachusetts, but they’ve had a strong offseason. Getting Thomas Jones at the cost of 26 spots was well worth it, giving them the lead runner they needed. This gives them good depth at RB with Leon Washington, and a pairing of Washington/Houston has a good skillset blend that I think is positive. There hasn’t been a significant loss, and adding Kenyon Coleman was also a positive move that adds depth to the 3-4. What’s the draft call? This one’s been difficult. CB and LB are certainly areas to focus on, especially if there’s an outside edge/hybrid type worth it. A NT would be nice, but in general, more DL talent would be appreciated. Offensively, more OL help is a consideration, and TE is a thought. That said, their OL need is more OT (they did resign Clement), and I don’t see them going OG here, and TE value is lacking (same goes for NT value). Posluszny and Ross were two recent names thrown out in a New York paper’s blog (forget which writer), but if Spencer is on the board, I think he gets the nod. He’s strong and stout for his size, but fluid enough in his movement to transition.

Pick: OLB/DE Anthony Spencer, Purdue

26. Philadelphia Eagles

They had a tremendous bounce back year, and this is an organization that, compared to others, is very thorough with it’s planning. Thus, this offseason hasn’t seen many big losses. The Lewis move was coming a mile away. Stallworth, on paper, is ably replaced by Kevin Curtis, and Roderick Hood was an expected casualty. Returning James and Buckhalter addresses depth at CB and a big back, removing two areas as early focuses. Adding Montae Reagor gives depth at DT and might take DT off the board now as a potential early focus. The only offensive area that might be a focus would be TE, but the value is lacking there, and as such, this pick is on defense. While safety and LB are much talked about, their DL’s play at the POA was poor last year and needs to be upgraded. Thus, the nod goes to Charles Johnson, who reminds me somewhat of Darren Howard, and also fits their MO of focusing on the trenches. Some improvement could come from development (namely, Bunkley), but more help is needed, and LB/S are deep enough to be addressed later if need be.

Pick: DE Charles Johnson, Georgia

27. New Orleans Saints

In my opinion, they’ve had a top offseason. No big losses, with Horn’s leadership being the key, as he is on the decline anyways. A great pickup in Simmons, who is still a physical talent upgrade over what they have, and offers leadership. Kaesviharn protects in case Roman Harper is slow to bounce back, and Eric Johnson was a great gamble, IMO, potentially addressing the one personnel offensive skill position hole last year if he is fully healthy. This pick is likely to go defense, where an impact DT would be nice if it was there, more LB help could be sought, and a top level CB is a consideration. A lot of intriguing options here for the Saints. Which way do they go? The nod goes to adding more depth at LB. Paul Posluszny seems like Sean Payton’s type of player. They nearly took Hawk last year at 2, and while Posluszny is no Hawk, he is a good talent. CB can likely be addressed later. They are rumored to be intrigued in Patrick Willis, and if Willis falls, he could become a target for them, as they have extra picks and may be willing to move up for him.

Pick: LB Paul Posluszny, Penn State

28. New England Patriots

As noted, I’ll be surprised if the Patriots exercise both picks in round 1, let alone, one pick. That said, I’m picking here. After adding an ILB, the door is still wide open on which direction to go. CB is a thought, as is edge/DL. Safety is a thought as well. I’m going safety, but with probably a surprise nod. The nod is to Eric Weddle. He seems like a Belichick type of player, versatile in his ability. He has been rising, but the Patriots have been known to take their guys higher anyways. He can challenge Eugene Wilson’s free safety job, or provide better depth at corner and potentially, a replacement for Samuel down the line if Wilson holds on. Meriweather, Griffin were thoughts, but tough to put Meriweather here, and Griffin isn’t the ideal challenge for Wilson at FS, while Sanders provides capable depth at strong safety. Justin Harrell was a thought, but passed.

Pick: DB Eric Weddle, Utah

29. Baltimore Ravens

Overall, it’s been an offseason more about the exits than the moves made. They’ve seen Adalius Thomas, Tony Pashos, Ovie Mughelli, and Aubrayo Franklin leave. The loss of Jamal Lewis is filled with Willis McGahee … which should be an upgrade. What do they do hear? A number of options, but Ozzie typically follows his board. And often times, many of his first round picks are guys who produced in college but were questioned on how their abilities translated to the pro level. Desmond Mason might not be there in Baltimore for long, and one goal this offseason was to improve the offense, as the defense was likely going to be sound even with the losses. What’s the call? While I prefer Dwayne Bowe, the nod goes to Dwayne Jarrett, the big, productive WR that offers the Ravens a possession target to go along with the quickness of Mark Clayton and the deep play ability of Demetrius Williams. OL was a long thought, as they need some help there, and same with CB.

Pick: WR Dwayne Jarrett, Southern California

30. San Diego Chargers

The late coaching switch certainly made for an intriguing offseason in Chargers land coming off a stellar year. Norv should be good for that offense, and in particular, good for Philip Rivers, though, and Rivers development is critical as they can’t continue to depend so heavily on Tomlinson. The staff changes and how the staff and personnel adjust will be key. It’s been a quiet offseason, with the loss of Donnie Edwards being the one big change. Keeping Kris Dielman, though, was huge. What’s next? Safety and WR are certainly areas that have been long discussed, and OL is a possibility as well, but probably for later, along with LB, where they have 3 youngsters in line, but could probably add a protection piece. This one was difficult, but the focus should be on improving Philip Rivers play, and that requires experience and weapons. Safety is a big need, but safety is a position that typically can be addressed later, or they could deal up for someone. In a deep WR class, they take one of the WR’s that may be best suited to providing immediate help. Originally, the pick was a surprise (Jason Hill), but with the redo on account of the trade, Dwayne Bowe has fallen, and the Chargers snatch him up. Big, physical receiver that might suit Norv’s preference. Solid speed for the size, but is quicker than fast, which works. If he falls this far, I think some team (perhaps the Niners) move up to grab him.

Pick: WR Dwayne Bowe, LSU

31. Chicago Bears

It’s been a rocky offseason for the defending NFC champs. It started with the coaching issues, with Lovie’s contract situation, and then Ron Rivera being let go. It moved onto personnel issues, with Thomas Jones being moved, and Lance Briggs unhappy. They’ve lost some key role players, such as Todd Johnson and Alfonso Boone. They did add Adam Archuleta, which should remove safety as a high consideration, especially if Mike Brown stays, but likely even if Mike Brown leaves. The Briggs situation bears watching. So what’s up in the draft? A number of ways they could go. All Bears fans know about Angelo and his floors, as well as Angelo and his risk taking on small school guys. Positionally, they could use an OG. As of now, Ruben Brown hasn’t resigned. WR/TE could be considered early, one or the other, perhaps both. LB is another top thought. The nod here goes to Ben Grubbs, who I view as the top guard grade. If Ruben resigns, that changes things, but Grubbs is a safe early pick that could start right away if demanded.

Pick: OG Ben Grubbs, Auburn

32. Indianapolis Colts

It’s been a fairly uneventful offseason for the Super Bowl champions. Some losses of concern, but nothing that causes alarms to go off. A RB may be sought to pair with Addai. June and Harper leaving hurts, but there are pieces in place and those losses were somewhat planned for. Reagor was injured last year. They lack a 2nd round pick. A lot of options really, as they could go a number of places, but their interior DL play was an issue last year, and a healthy Justin Harrell could answer a lot of things, providing more size and potentially stouter play inside. Long thought about a WR, but they can wait on that, as this draft has adequate depth.

Pick: DT Justin Harrell, Tennessee

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 06:37 PM
2nd Round – comments sharply decline

33. Oakland Raiders

Many different areas they could go. Tempted to go Ryan Kalil or Jason Hill here, but the nod goes to Michael Griffin as their enforcer type they need in the secondary joining former teammate Michael Huff.

Pick: S Michael Griffin, Texas

34. Detroit Lions

They’ve shored up the OL. What’s next? ILB is a consideration, as is CB. DE is a potential thought. Nod goes to Aaron Ross.

Pick: CB Aaron Ross, Texas

35. Tampa Bay Buccaneers

After adding CJ, they could get to work on that defense. Timmons is awfully tempting as someone to groom long term, but he’s not an immediate area of concern. It’s a difficult decision, but the nod goes to Ray McDonald, who would likely start his career off as a DE/DT tweener/situational type but, long run, be planned for as a the UT. He has the ability to hold some more bulk as well.

Pick: DL Ray McDonald, Florida

36. Cleveland Browns

They got their lead runner earlier. The trenches are a possibility here, as is cornerback potentially. A TE or a WR wouldn’t surprise me either. If there’s a potentially dominant 3-4 DL talent, they need to consider it. Tank Tyler draws some consideration, but the nod is to Ikaika Alama-Francis.

Pick: DL Ikaika Alama-Francis, Hawaii.

37. Chicago Bears f/ Washington through New York Jets

After addressing the OL, what’s next? I gave long thought to an offensive weapon, but Lawrence Timmons is still on the board this time around, and the nod goes there as a gamble on athletic ability. Timmons could be long gone already … but there are mixed reports on where his value is perceived, and with the LB’s so close, I wonder if his lack of refinement will hurt him somewhat.

Pick: LB Lawrence Timmons, Florida State

38. Arizona Cardinals

They landed their impact DE earlier, and they add Tony Ugoh here as someone for Russ Grimm to mold and develop at tackle.

Pick: OT Tony Ugoh, Arkansas

39. Atlanta Falcons f/ Houston Texans

They’ve added their big running back. What’s next? Trench work and safety work is needed. Tank Tyler, provided they feel comfortable with his background, would offer bulk inside. Grady Jackson is coming off surgery and Babineaux has, um, issues. Tim Crowder and some OL options were a close 2nd.

Pick: DT Demarcus Tyler, North Carolina State

40. Miami Dolphins

After adding a CB in round 1, they could be looking at DL talent here, perhaps OL talent, and potentially a receiving target. While I like Sidney Rice a lot, the nod here goes to Jason Hill. Jason Hill tested out well all around, with good numbers. He’s the big, physical type of WR that Cam might like, but a smooth, fairly polished WR prospect that can adapt well. Jason’s biggest issue is in regards to why his numbers fell off his senior year. A case could be made in regards to his injuries, a weakened running game with Harrison gone, and the emergence of Brandon Gibson.

Pick: WR Jason Hill, Washington State

41. Minnesota Vikings

After adding an early safety, they’ll likely be looking for a WR target. Craig Davis has the high end potential that could attract their attention, but the nod goes to Sidney Rice as they try again out of South Carolina.

Pick: WR Sidney Rice, South Carolina

42. San Francisco 49ers

They added a safety earlier and could look a number of directions here. 3-4 DL talent is needed, S is a thought, as is WR. They need a WR target, and Craig Davis, Anthony Gonzalez and Steve Smith draw some attention, along with Brandon Siler, and David Harris. Alex Smith needs weapons, though, so the nod goes with the immense potential of Craig Davis, with the size and speed to potentially be special.

Pick: WR Craig Davis, LSU

43. Buffalo Bills

They landed their RB in round 1. What’s next? They could look at DT, LB, WR, CB here. I was thinking Brandon Siler here forever, but at the end, I’m debating between Anthony Gonzalez and the potential of Marcus McCauley. I can’t help but think that someone’s going to take a gamble on McCauley’s upside, and at 43, this might be a worthy gamble for the Bills. Quinn Pitcock was 4th on the list.

Pick: CB Marcus McCauley, Fresno State

44. Atlanta Falcons

They’ve added a RB and DT earlier. DE/OL/S still are at the top of their board. The rumor is that Meriweather’s background checks have went surprisingly well. That said, they need bulk on that OL, and the nod is to a big guard that might help them start reshaping things in the trenches. Justin Blalock gets the push here.

Pick: OG Justin Blalock, Texas

45. Carolina Panthers

After going with DE in round 1, safety, LB, OL, WR, TE could all be considered here. The nod goes to Ben Patrick as a receiving TE that can help in the blocking game. WR is a thought, with Gonzalez topping the list.

Pick: TE Ben Patrick, Delaware

46. Pittsburgh Steelers

They added a WR earlier. OL is a thought, but unlikely, IMO, so the focus is defense, where edge help, DL help, and CB help is warranted, along with a long run transitional LB. Tim Shaw is rising up the boards, and could be someone that can help now in the 3-4, as an edge, and long run, might be able to be a weakside option in a cover 2 defense.

Pick: LB Tim Shaw, Penn State

47. Green Bay Packers

After adding a TE earlier, they could look to secondary help. But they need a running back bad. If they feel that Brian Leonard can handle the load, then he gets the nod here. He had excellent agility numbers, and his running style could fit well.

Pick: RB Brian Leonard, Rutgers

48. Jacksonville Jaguars

They added a playmaking safety earlier. What’s next? A number of options, although if there’s DE value, that gets the nod. Tim Crowder might be the best base end on the board, and he gets a decent pass rush.

Pick: DE Tim Crowder, Texas

49. Cincinnati Bengals

They went corner earlier. An impact DT could draw a look, as could a safety. The talk is that Brandon Meriweather’s overall background isn’t going to send up big flags. Do they roll the dice again … or do they gamble with someone like Michael Coe? The nod is to the gamble in Brandon Meriweather.

Pick: S Brandon Meriweather, the U

50. Tennessee Titans

After adding Alan Branch earlier, they could look at a number of options. Can they really afford to wait on WR again, though? The nod goes to someone that Norm Chow knows a little about, in Steve Smith. He gives them that quicker receiver to go with their current cast. His better than expected workouts have pushed him up.

Pick: WR Steve Smith, Southern California

51. New York Giants

With the nod to OL earlier, they have to go defense here, with LB or CB. Eric Wright is the top talent available, and he’s slipped a bit on account of background. He gets the nod here, as a potential man corner that could really free up the front 7 to attack.

Pick: CB Eric Wright, UNLV

52. St. Louis Rams

After adding CB earlier, they could be looking DT here. Quinn Pitcock has solidified a mid-day 1 value, and could be an option here that Haslett and Payton might like.

Pick: DT Quinn Pitcock, the Ohio State

53. Dallas Cowboys

After adding a playmaker in Ted Ginn Jr., what next? The secondary still needs some work depth wise, even if they add Hamlin. They could use another edge guy. What’s the call? Tough one, but the nod goes to the top athlete in Brian Robison as someone for Wade Phillips to mold with Demarcus Ware.

Pick: OLB/DE Brian Robison, Texas

54. Kansas City Chiefs

After adding Levi Brown earlier, they could still look trenches here. Adding a DT would be a thought. An OG is worth consideration as well. But I think they need another playmaking WR. What’s the nod? The smooth and polished Anthony Gonzalez offers bigger upside than given credit for.

Pick: WR Anthony Gonzalez, the Ohio State

55. Seattle Seahawks

They’ve had a busy offseason. Jim Mora Jr. was added to help the defense, and he brought along Patrick Kerney, who replaces Grant Wistrom. Their coverage was an issue last year, and Deon Grant and Brian Russell add depth in those areas, succinctly replacing Ken Hamlin. Marcus Pollard will be a stopgap TE, but a TE is needed with Stevens gone. The nod here is on the offensive line, where Ryan Kalil may be too good to pass up, moving Chris Spencer back to guard. If Kalil falls this far, I think someone moves up for him. Tough to gauge where he goes, as he could go first, but this range also seems somewhat appropriate.

Pick: C Ryan Kalil, Southern California

56. Denver Broncos

Earlier, they added a defensive end. What’s next? DT, safety could draw some consideration. OL depth would be a thought on the other side. A player like Brandon Mebane would give a push inside while having enough girth to hold the fort.

Pick: DT Brandon Mebane, California

57. Philadelphia Eagles

They added an end earlier. What’s next? They could look LB/S/TE. David Harris could be their MIKE of the future, but the nod goes to John Wendling as the big strong safety that might be an ideal fit for the squad. He might not be there in the 3rd, whereas good LB talent can be found later.

Pick: S John Wendling, Wyoming

58. New Orleans Saints

After picking up Posluszny, they could look defensive line. But they need a corner, and the nod goes to Jonathan Wade.

Pick: CB Jonathan Wade, Tennessee

59. New York Jets

With the nod to an edge rusher earlier, they could go a number of optins. TE/CB/DL stand out. They go for TE Zach Miller, who might be someone Miami looks at next.

Pick: TE Zach Miller, Arizona State

60. Miami Dolphins f/ New England

They’ve added Jason Hill and Darrelle Revis. DL talent is possible. TE value is likely off here. QB is a thought. I think they nab Trent Edwards here before someone else picks him up.

Pick: QB Trent Edwards, Stanford

61. Baltimore Ravens

They added Dwayne Jarrett earlier, which should help open the offense up. OL and DB could be thoughts here. The nod goes to Brandon Siler, arguably the top player on the board at this time. He can perhaps be utilized inside or outside for them.

Pick: LB Brandon Siler, Florida

62. San Diego Chargers

After adding Dwayne Bowe earlier, OL and DB could be looked at. The nod goes to DB, where a strong safety option like Sabby Piscitelli may fit, provided he’s not asked too much of in deep support.

Pick: S Sabby Piscitelli, Oregon State

63. New York Jets f/ Chicago Bears

They’ve added Spencer and Miller so far. OL could draw a look here. DL and CB could draw looks as well. In a mild surprise, Josh Wilson climbs to the spot here, as he seems to be a potential fit for the scheme. He does a good job of tracking the ball in air while in coverage, which is underrated.

Pick: CB Josh Wilson, Maryland

64. Tampa Bay Buccaneers f/ Indianapolis Colts

They’ve added Calvin Johnson and Ray McDonald. A DE could be sought, as could DB talent. If Lamarr Woodley is here, he may be a tempting fit.

Pick: DE Lamarr Woodley, Michigan

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 06:37 PM
Third Round

65. Oakland Raiders

They’ve added Russell and Griffin. TE value is questionable here. WR is certainly a possibility. Additional OL could draw consideration, as could a DT or LB if they liked someone a lot. What’s the move? The nod goes to additional bulk up front in the form of Arron Sears.

Pick: OL Arron Sears, Tennessee

66. Detroit Lions

They’ve added Joe Thomas and Aaron Ross. What’s next? LB/DE would seem to be thoughts. A DE like Victor Abiamiri might be too intriguing at this point. The nod goes to Drew Stanton, though, as a QB of the future candidate.

Pick: QB Drew Stanton, Michigan State

67. Cleveland Browns

They’ve gone QB and DL to start. OL/RB/DB could draw consideration here. The nod is to a local running back, Antonio Pittman, as a pairing with Jamal Lewis.

Pick: RB Antonio Pittman, the Ohio State

68. Tampa Bay Buccaneers

With CJ, they added their playmaking WR. With McDonald and Woodley, they hope to have a UT and DE for the scheme. What’s next? The nod is to the secondary, where depth at CB and S could be sought. The pick is Michael Coe, who could challenge in both areas. While Coe didn’t have a standout 2005, he was solid. All the “emerged” after moving down talk makes it seem as if he was burnt toast at Arkansas.

Pick: DB Michael Coe, Alabama State

69. Arizona Cardinals

They’ve added a DE and an OT. Where to? A number of options really, but their top need is probably a weakside backer at this point. Perhaps a guy like Justin Durant.

Pick: LB Justin Durant, Hampton

70. Denver Broncos f/ Washington Redskins

They’ve added a DT and DE. Safety/LB could be looked at. A running back of the future may be a thought. Where to? The nod here is to Brandon Jackson as someone to groom long term at RB.

Pick: RB Brandon Jackson, Nebraska

71. Miami Dolphins

With Revis, they addressed the secondary. Jason Hill gives them a potential starting WR, and Edwards gives them a QB to groom. Where to next? An OT may be a thought, and someone like James Marten could be a possibility here.

Pick: OT James Marten, Boston College

72. Minnesota Vikings

With Rice and Landry, they address to key areas. What’s next? Another WR could be sought. A RB might be an idea. Pass rushing help is possible, as is CB. Daymeion Hughes is falling badly, but he might be a very good system fit at this point.

Pick: CB Daymeion Hughes, California

73. Houston Texans

With their Schaub splash, this is their 2nd pick. Where to after adding Okoye earlier? Secondary help is needed. WR help is a thought. OL is always an option. The nod goes to WR here, with Aundrae Allison getting the nod.

Pick: WR Aundrae Allison, East Carolina

74. Buffalo Bills

Lynch and McCauley may address two big needs earlier. DT and LB are possibilities here. Tough call, as Turk McBride is awfully tempting, but the nod goes to Zak DeOssie here, as a potential stud MIKE fit if he develops.

Pick: LB Zak DeOssie, Brown

75. Atlanta Falcons

They’ve added Blalock, Tyler, and Peterson. If Abiamiri is on the board here, they’ll jump on it I think.

Pick: DE Victor Abiamiri, Notre Dame

76. San Francisco 49ers

They’ve added Craig Davis to go with Patrick Willis. What’s next? If there’s 3-4 DL value, that’ll be looked at. OL can’t be crossed off. Even drafting a RB can’t be ruled out. Safety is another thought. Based on the board, provided his background checks out, the nod goes to Tanard Jackson to challenge at FS and perhaps add CB depth. Roman/Lewis are nice, but they really aren’t long term answers.

Pick: S Tanard Jackson, Syracuse

77. Pittsburgh Steelers

Shaw and Meachem help fill some holes. What’s next? OL is a thought. DL is a thought. CB is a thought. Turk McBride may be a thought as someone that can help out as a 3-4 DE, and eventually, be the UT in a 4-3 tampa 2 look.

Pick: DL Turk McBride, Tennessee

78. Green Bay Packers

Olsen and Leonard add dimensions to the offense. What’s next? WR is a thought. I wouldn’t rule out QB either. Of course, the potential Moss trade could impact things. CB and S have to be looked at. David Irons gets the nod here.

Pick: CB David Irons, Auburn

79. Jacksonville Jaguars

Reggie Nelson and Tim Crowder shore up areas on the defense. What’s next? Really, a lot of ways they could go here, and BPA would be fine. This might be a mildly interesting call. Nod goes to Josh Beekman as interior OL depth.

Pick: OL Josh Beekman, Boston College

80. Cincinnati – Forfeited for Ahmad Brooks

81. Tennessee Titans

They’ve added Alan Branch and Steve Smith. A DE could get a look. RB might be a thought. Safety is a possibility. Another CB is an option. A gamble on Fred Bennett may be worth it here, giving additional protection in case Pacman is out.

Pick: CB Fred Bennett, South Carolina

82. New York Giants

They’ve added Staley and Wright. A playmaking LB might be at the top of their list here. Quincy Black may be worth the gamble here.

Pick: LB Quincy Black, New Mexico

83. St. Louis Rams

They’ve added corner and DT. What’s next? Two intriguing names on the board in Moses and Bush. The nod goes to Michael Bush as a backup to ease the load on Steven Jackson.

Pick: RB Michael Bush, Lousiville

84. Carolina Panthers

They’ve addressed DE and TE so far. LB/S could draw some looks. David Harris has slipped somewhat, but he might be a good fit inside here.

Pick: LB David Harris, Michigan

85. Kansas City Chiefs

Brown and Gonzalez address two key offensive areas. This pick likely goes defense, with the secondary and DL as options. Moses is tempting. Tarell Brown may be an intriguing gamble here, provided things check out.

Pick: CB Tarell Brown, Texas

86. Seattle Seahawks

They dealt with the OL earlier. What’s next? A number of options they could go, but a TE is definitely needed, and Scott Chandler may provide an intriguing option.

Pick: TE Scott Chandler, Iowa

87. Denver Broncos

DT/DE/RB have been addressed. Safety is a thought here. LB is an option. OL is a possibility. Could they take a gamble on Aaron Rouse here? I’m hesitant with this, as my gut feeling says this is high for Rouse.

Pick: S Aaron Rouse, Virginia Tech

88. Dallas Cowboys

Ginn Jr. and Robison gives them two tremendous guys … that need molding. A number of directions are possible here, but additional secondary help may top the list, along with DL. Travarous Bain may be the longer, bigger type of corner Wade Phillips might like.

Pick: CB Travarous Bain, Hampton

89. New Orleans Saints

Posluszny and Wade address two key needs. Where to next? A DT gamble may be in store. A number of options … but someone like LaRon Harris could be a diamond in the rough.

Pick: DT LaRon Harris, Northwest Oklahoma State University

90. New York Jets

They’ve added CB, edge, and TE help. OL is a possibility here, as is DL. Tough call here. NT talent is hard to find, and the nod goes to Paul Soliai. They hope he’s better than Sione Pouha (and I think Soliai is).

Pick: NT Paul Soliai, Utah

91. Philadelphia Eagles

They’ve added a safety to compete and a DE. LB could draw some looks here, along with TE. The nod is to LB, where Stewart Bradley may be able to provide depth inside and at the SAM spot, along with more bulk.

Pick: LB Stewart Bradley, Nebraska

92. New England Patriots

Secondary and ILB were the nods earlier. What’s next? A young edge talent is a thought, along with OL depth. Andy Alleman is a guy I’ve rated highly, and he’s slipped somewhat. He could provide some critical OL depth.

Pick: OL Andy Alleman, Akron

93. Buffalo f/ Baltimore

DeOssie, McCauley, Lynch potentially address key areas. What’s next? A WR or TE may get the look here. A bigger WR like Courtney Taylor may be a nice fit.

Pick: WR Courtney Taylor, Auburn

94. San Diego Chargers

They’ve added Bowe and Piscitelli. What’s next? Manny Ramirez has fallen for some inexplicable reason, and he gets the nod here.

Pick: OG Manuel Ramirez, Texas Tech

95. Chicago Bears

Where to now, after adding a LB and OG? OL/RB/WR/TE/DL/CB could all be thoughts. A runner like Kenny Irons or Lorenzo Booker may be good fits to complement. Irons profiles as the better runner, with Booker as being more versatile. Nod to Irons.

Pick: RB Kenny Irons, Auburn

96. Indianapolis Colts

They added some DT help earlier. A lot of directions they could go. A backup running back may be sought, and a versatile weapon like Lorenzo Booker might be tempting. His running style should pair well with the downhill preferences of Addai.

Pick: RB Lorenzo Booker, Florida State

Third Round Compensatory guesses by AdamJT13

97. San Diego Chargers

After adding an OG/S/WR, they could go a number of directions. They understand the value of DL talent, though, so gambling on someone like Antonio Johnson may be a worthwhile exercise.

Pick: DL Antonio Johnson, Mississippi State

98. San Francisco 49ers

Tanard Jackson and Patrick Willis shore up some areas on defense. Craig Davis offers an offensive weapon. Where to next? Quentin Moses is hanging on the board, and he might be too tempting to pass up here. The nod, though, goes to getting a backup running back. Not sure why Hunt fell for me this time around.

Pick: RB Tony Hunt, Penn State

99. Indianapolis Colts

Harrell and Booker address some key immediate needs. A number of directions are possible here. Could a guy like Buster Davis draw some consideration?

Pick: LB Buster Davis, Florida State

Windy
03-21-2007, 06:44 PM
1st and 3rd are very good picks. Sears would be a solid addition at tackle.
The Griffin pick is interesting. I won't say it's a bad pick because Schweigert is nothing but average. I just think we have bigger needs at other positions.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 06:59 PM
1st and 3rd are very good picks. Sears would be a solid addition at tackle.
The Griffin pick is interesting. I won't say it's a bad pick because Schweigert is nothing but average. I just think we have bigger needs at other positions.

Just wondering who you'd prefer to see there, then. I gave long, long thought to Kalil (which would likely remove Sears for me as the 3rd round pick), but in the end, I'm just not sure I see them going that route despite the familiarity. The TE's are a tough sell at 33, even projecting a bit. WR and DT do come to mind as possibilities. Timmons might be tempting ... but is it really necessary there? Just curious.

RaiderNation
03-21-2007, 07:11 PM
griffin in the 2nd, pretty weird pick. sears is a great pick up in the 3rd. good 1st. to answer ur question above, a speed rushing DE would be a better pick in the 2nd

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:14 PM
griffin in the 2nd, pretty weird pick. sears is a great pick up in the 3rd. good 1st. to answer ur question above, a speed rushing DE would be a better pick in the 2nd

Okay, so out of curiosity, if the board fell that way, then who? McDonald and Alama-Francis don't fit the speed rushing mold. Crowder isn't really a speed rusher, and I'm questioable about him at 33. Robison/Moses/Bazuin and others? Not really ideal. Woodley seems a bit high there (and he really isn't a speed rusher either), and Abiamiri might be a tad high there as well.

WinslowBodden
03-21-2007, 07:16 PM
If the Browns do that I'll be estatic (spelling).

It hurts however that we don't pick up a guard in this draft, but we get a franchise QB, a good DL (ours were horrible last year) and a RB that I think has a good future in this league.

eaglesalltheway
03-21-2007, 07:18 PM
I know you are one of the more intelligent guys on this site toonster, but I relly doubt the Eagles will draft a DE in the first, especially witht he re-signing of Juqua Thomas. I know our DEs are getting old and need to be replaced, but if all are healthy, we are set at that position for next year. There is a rumor that Kearse could have been back for the playoffs, so I think he will be ready for next season, thus improving the play of our whole D-line. I highly doubt we draft DE early with Griffin and Poz still available. We would probably take Griffin over Poz, but would take either if one of them was gone. In the second, assuming we take Griffin, we would have sooooo many options to look at. We could go MLB with Harris, but he reminds me of Trotter, he is not an all downs sort of LB. We could go Woodley as a DE, but I still think it is too early to draft this spot with the need on our team, that goes for Abiamiri as well, who could be another possibility. We may be looking at Fred Bennett, he would be a great Nickel for our defense. But we just re-signed William James, and it the second round is way too early to draft a Nickel CB for our needs, that goes for Hughes as well, who could be an acceptable pick. Brandon Siler is an option as well for our second pick, along with TE Zach Miller. Miller is questionable because we may not even need TE at all, depending on how contract talks with LJ Smith would turn out. Out of all of those guys Siler would be the most likely as he could play WILL or MIKE for us, but we may go in another direction. It all depends on who is left. In the third, the Eagles may go with Anthony Waters. Trotter is getting up there in age and is already showing signs of slowing down. Waters, if fully recovered from his ACL tear, could be our all around MLB that could replace Trotter. Waters is a very balanced LB who plays the run and pass very well. Buster Davis is another guy who we may look at, but he is undersized, and we don't need another undersized LB, we have lots of them. Depending on how the first two rounds and the rest of the picks ahead of us work out, this may be the spot where the Eagles go with a DE, CB, or TE. I still wouldn't rule out a big RB even though we re-signed Buckhalter, our FO was looking really hard at Brian Leonard. Depending on where he goes, he may be a pick for the Eagles as well. Ben Patrick is another possibility at TE that the Eagles may be looking at. He is the most balanced TE in this draft, and I am lucky enough to have a little bit of inside information on him. (A friend of mine's uncle is the HC for Delaware, and I have been informed about this guy for a while.) Its not like I know every single thing about this guy, but I probably know more than most of the guys on this site if they are interested in knowing more about him.

RaiderNation
03-21-2007, 07:20 PM
Okay, so out of curiosity, if the board fell that way, then who? McDonald and Alama-Francis don't fit the speed rushing mold. Crowder isn't really a speed rusher, and I'm questioable about him at 33. Robison/Moses/Bazuin and others? Not really ideal. Woodley seems a bit high there (and he really isn't a speed rusher either), and Abiamiri might be a tad high there as well.

ya u have a point there. if it went that way i guess it comes down to griffin or ugoh or possibily kalil.

luckyjackaubrey
03-21-2007, 07:20 PM
Great analysis. I think you have the Patriots pegged. I am personaly hoping for the trade down scenario to pick up a few of those guys everyone would label as first round reaches:

Leonard
Weddle
DeOssie
Gonzalez
Bradley
Piscetelli

Nice job.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:31 PM
Eagles - I'm just not sold yet on LB and S, LB moreso than safety. At LB, track record doesn't indicate that, and more importantly, they seem pleased with their options. Juqua Thomas doesn't really, though, IMO, address the concern at end last year, which was the play at the POA. Kearse wouldn't do that either.

Anyhow, tis early, so we'll see how it shakes out. A lot can change.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:32 PM
ya u have a point there. if it went that way i guess it comes down to griffin or ugoh or possibily kalil.

I thought about Ugoh there, but I have a hard time going that route. Ugoh needs a lot of development, and I'm not certain if he's a pro tackle anyways (sometimes, he looks like one, other times, looks like a guard). Can they afford such a risk? I guess it's possible, with the idea that, at worst, Ugoh might be able to be a guard for them, and McQuistan might shift to tackle long run. Will revisit whenever I revisit day 1 again.

Crickett
03-21-2007, 07:42 PM
I'd like to tip my hat to you. It's obvious you put a lot of work into this mock draft. I put this into word and the word count is around eleven thousand.

My only concerns regarding the Jets draft is the lack of an offensive linemen and that drafting Soliai seems to me like drafting Pouha for a second time.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:46 PM
I'd like to tip my hat to you. It's obvious you put a lot of work into this mock draft. I put this into word and the word count is around eleven thousand.

My only concerns regarding the Jets draft is the lack of an offensive linemen and that drafting Soliai seems to me like drafting Pouha for a second time.

Thanks. I agree OL deserves some looks, and I was tempted to go OG with the 3rd rounder instead. That said, they do need a NT, and they lack a 4th rounder as of now. The chances are high that when they pick again, Pouha has been long gone. Whereas, RT's and OG's can usually be found later. But tis early, so we'll see how things shake out.

eaglesalltheway
03-21-2007, 07:47 PM
Eagles - I'm just not sold yet on LB and S, LB moreso than safety. At LB, track record doesn't indicate that, and more importantly, they seem pleased with their options. Juqua Thomas doesn't really, though, IMO, address the concern at end last year, which was the play at the POA. Kearse wouldn't do that either.

Anyhow, tis early, so we'll see how it shakes out. A lot can change.

The Eagles have gone after LBs and Safeties in this off-season, we just haven't signed any yet. We made a contract offer to Mike Doss, but he hasn't replied with anything yet. If that doesn't work out, we will go Safety very early this year. We tried to get Ryan Fowler through RFA, but were outbid by the Titans. Our biggest needs are by far LB and Safety, with other concerns at DT, DE, CB, TE, RB, and a backup QB. Note: RB and QB are minor concerns if yyou ask me. If any of the top LBs in Willis, Poz, Timmons, or Beason, or Michael Grifin are available for our pick, one of them will be gone. Juqua is what most would consider a minor signing, but with him comign back with Kearse, it will help make our D-line rotation what it was the first two games of the season. I beleive we had 10+ sacks and we were fairing well against the run. I agree that Kearse isn't exactly a beast at the POA, but he draws the double teams that free up the rest of our front seven. When he was playing, Darren Howard, Trent Cole, Mike Patterson, and Darwin Walker were making much more plays. Trent Cole was leading the whole NFL in sacks for a while, but that went away once Kearse was taken from the rotation.

Xiomera
03-21-2007, 07:48 PM
Toonster,

Let me begin by asking why you don't have DET dealing down? I assumed it was because this was a no-trade mock, but I saw the HOU-ATL swap . . . hmm . . .

I love the Lions picks. All of them are great, but I just cannot believe that we won't take a DE on day one. It is our biggest need. Kalimba Edwards is a starter as it stands now. That's all you need to know. You were right, Abiamiri would be intriguing in the 3rd, but Stanton is good too.

Overall, a nice mock as always. I am amazed at the length and depth of those explanations every time.

eaglesalltheway
03-21-2007, 07:52 PM
Toonster,

Let me begin by asking why you don't have DET dealing down? I assumed it was because this was a no-trade mock, but I saw the HOU-ATL swap . . . hmm . . .

I love the Lions picks. All of them are great, but I just cannot believe that we won't take a DE on day one. It is our biggest need. Kalimba Edwards is a starter as it stands now. That's all you need to know. You were right, Abiamiri would be intriguing in the 3rd, but Stanton is good too.

Overall, a nice mock as always. I am amazed at the length and depth of those explanations every time.

Houston Traded for Schaub. It is sort of big news. But Detroit does need to address DE early.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:53 PM
Largely because the Houston-Atlanta trade seems a certainty to go down, whereas, the other things, I'd be taking guesses.

Xiomera
03-21-2007, 07:55 PM
Houston Traded for Schaub. It is sort of big news. But Detroit does need to address DE early.

I know that, but their first round picks were not involved. I was just asking why he had this deal taking place and not one for Detroit, who is more likely than anyone to make a deal.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 07:57 PM
I know that, but their first round picks were not involved. I was just asking why he had this deal taking place and not one for Detroit, who is more likely than anyone to make a deal.

Huh, the first round picks were involved. They swapped firsts. I'm a bit confused. The only issue left is a contract extension for Schaub. At least, that's what I read this afternoon.

Btw, your 4th round pick, as of now, is Dan Bazuin, barring dramatic changes to day 1.

jackalope
03-21-2007, 07:59 PM
I don't really like Leonard in the 2nd but our 1st and 3rd rounders are pretty good.

Xiomera
03-21-2007, 08:01 PM
Huh, the first round picks were involved. They swapped firsts. I'm a bit confused. The only issue left is a contract extension for Schaub. At least, that's what I read this afternoon.

Btw, your 4th round pick, as of now, is Dan Bazuin, barring dramatic changes to day 1.

WOW, sorry . . . before I went to work that swap of picks hadn't been reported . . . lol . . . I am seriously out of the loop.

Sorry

Damix
03-21-2007, 08:03 PM
I'll take Wright and Black, but Staley doesn't make much sense, we already has a very athletic LT prospect in Whimper.

Slasher28
03-21-2007, 08:08 PM
20.OT Joe Staley, Central Michigan
23.OL Levi Brown, Penn State
There is something wrong there

51.CB Eric Wright, UNLV
average pick

82.LB Quincy Black, New Mexico
like the pick, but it is risky

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 08:09 PM
Here's my question for Giants fans: Can you really go into a critical season depending on Diehl (a guard who spots at tackle) or Whimper (an athletic OL talent that some felt was better suited at guard, but even if he was a long range tackle, the feeling was that there was a lot of technique work to do)? Maybe Whimper's progressed a lot in one year ... but it's such a critical year, not because of Coughlin, but more because of Eli. Can you go into it with just those two as the main options to protect Eli's blindside?

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 08:10 PM
There is something wrong there


average pick


like the pick, but it is risky

Why is there something wrong? I have Staley ahead of Brown. I know others have it differently, but I have Staley ahead of Brown due to higher potential at left tackle, a bit more sound technically, better footwork, and the ability to "explode" as an offensive lineman.

eaglesalltheway
03-21-2007, 08:14 PM
Why is there something wrong? I have Staley ahead of Brown. I know others have it differently, but I have Staley ahead of Brown due to higher potential at left tackle, a bit more sound technically, better footwork, and the ability to "explode" as an offensive lineman.

Higher potential at LT belongs to Brown in this case. There is only one tackle in this draft that has high potential at LT than Brown and that is Thomas. I know Staley is faster, but Brown has been widely reguarded as the second best LT in the draft, with some experts having him ahead of Thomas.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 08:18 PM
I disagree. I had Brown higher in the past overall, but Staley as having the higher LT potential. I think Brown can be a solid LT, but he won't fit for every scheme. Staley's more sound technically in pass protection, has the better physical upside, has better footwork, knee explosion is better.

Edit: The feeling I get post-combine is that Staley has pulled level with Brown. Now, I fully recognize many still have Brown with a higher grade.

eaglesalltheway
03-21-2007, 08:22 PM
OK that is you ropinion and you are obviously well educated on this sort of thing, so I won't turn this into a shouting match. You bring up good points, but it isn't just about pass protection and footwork and explosion. I must disagree about potential though. Brown has only played LT for a few years, he is learning the postion as well, I know Staley is doing the same, but with Brown's averall package, I just see him as a better LT.

dcarey20
03-21-2007, 09:00 PM
mixed feelings about dwayne jarrett to the ravens. 29-30 is about where i have him ranked on my board. i have bowe rated higher just like you. receiver just isn't much of a need for us, but it could easily happen, should ozzie have dj ranked highly. that's what it all comes down to. now to the pick. everyone has realized that mark clayton is a stud and the coaches and front office absolutely love demetrius williams. i really don't know what to make of the pick. there are things i like about it and things i don't like. what i like: while we have the first 3 receiver spots filled, some depth may be need and dwayne jarrett is exactly the type of player that fills our need: a big, tall, possession receiver. he would be a nice target in the redzone which would also help. but some things i don't like: i think the lack of speed will hold him back to a certain extent, and i don't see him ever being a great player. something like a 60 catch per season guy with nice TD numbers around the goalline. another thing i don't like is i think d-will and clayton are destined to be the future #1 and #2, and this pick may set them back. third thing i don't like is i think he is going one spot ahead of a guy who is better, dwayne bowe.

sorry if that's confusing, but that's the best i can explain how i feel.

nice brandon siler pick in the 2nd

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 09:06 PM
Dwayne Bowe is someone I have higher as well, and as I've noted, I like him better. But my feeling is that Jarrett is the more likely pick for Ozzie with his collegiate track record. That said, I could see it going either way.

So why WR? I'm not sure Mason is there for long, and in Jarrett (or Bowe), you get a different skillset from what's already there with the big, physical receivers.

That said, things are very open for the Ravens, so let's see how it plays out.

21ST
03-21-2007, 09:08 PM
Solid redskins pick but i hope and pray that we trade down unless Johnson magical will fall to us.

dcarey20
03-21-2007, 09:12 PM
Dwayne Bowe is someone I have higher as well, and as I've noted, I like him better. But my feeling is that Jarrett is the more likely pick for Ozzie with his collegiate track record. That said, I could see it going either way.

So why WR? I'm not sure Mason is there for long, and in Jarrett (or Bowe), you get a different skillset from what's already there with the big, physical receivers.

That said, things are very open for the Ravens, so let's see how it plays out.

yeah its definitely not a bad pick. just that i don't really know what to make of it. if the jarrett pick is made, i think we will look back at it and say "not a great pick, but definitely not a bad one."

and as you said, our draft plans are wide open. we don't have many glaring needs. to be honest, i think we could skip over the draft altogether and still field an ok team. so we could go a variety of ways. what it will most likely come down to is how highly guys are ranked on ozzie's board, and what the front office feels are our biggest holes.

Paranoidmoonduck
03-21-2007, 09:23 PM
Not sure I think that Schweigert is in such need of replacing to warrant taking Griffin or that Sears is exactly what this line needs, but as always I enjoy reading your mocks.

toonsterwu
03-21-2007, 09:42 PM
yeah its definitely not a bad pick. just that i don't really know what to make of it. if the jarrett pick is made, i think we will look back at it and say "not a great pick, but definitely not a bad one."

and as you said, our draft plans are wide open. we don't have many glaring needs. to be honest, i think we could skip over the draft altogether and still field an ok team. so we could go a variety of ways. what it will most likely come down to is how highly guys are ranked on ozzie's board, and what the front office feels are our biggest holes.

I should've explanded mroe, and your post help ties that in. I think, entering this offseason, despite the loss of Adalius, they knew they could field a solid-good defense again if no additions were made. But they have to pick that offense up a notch. Adding Willis was one step, but another WR would really open things up, especially a big possession target.

That said, wide open. Only time will tell.
______________

Raiders - THought long and hard about ALleman in the 3rd. I'm not so sure Sears is an ideal fit either to be honest.

etk
03-21-2007, 09:47 PM
Pretty good Bucs mock, but it's even nicer to see someone who put in the time and effort to make a mock with full analysis and 3 rounds. All these "quickie" mocks don't excite me anymore....

tylerb929
03-21-2007, 09:50 PM
Perfect 1st day for the Colts. Justin Harrell, Lorenzo Booker, and Buster Davis, wow, I think I'd **** my pants.

thule
03-22-2007, 12:09 AM
Toonster...what can I say except you made my day.

Now onto the draft :P
From a Dallas fan perspective I'm probably one of the few that will love this draft. I am a firm believe in improving the overall talent of a team through the draft. I honestly think that if there is a freak available in the first round you take him. Ginn although raw has a few qualities of another OSU alum in Glenn...I wonder if TG would take him under his wing. I agree...Dallas has a good youthful WR corps behind TO and TG...with Crayton, Hurd, and Austin. But we do lack that speed guy of the future. We aren't so much looking for a #1 guy as much as a compliment to Crayton and Hurd. That is why I love the Ginn pick so much..so I got to rep that pick.

Robinson is really a guy who has got my attention as of late. I'm not really sure which side to project him at. He seems to have the build and skillset to play either the sam or the will. With the versatility Ware showed towards the end of the year I really think the cowboys are at an interesting situation with how they address the OLB position. Being that whoever they draft could cause Ware to move over to the strong side. I do think Robinson is a bit raw especially going into the 3-4....I'm sure he'll have a bit of a curve...but it's almost a godsend...to have him waiting in the wings with Ellis in there. I'm not sure if he would be a solid contributor early...but definitely be a good future move for the organization. Probably get similar playing time that Carp saw his first year.

I like the Bain pick giving the available options. You hit it right one the head when talking about his size. Should be nice as a dime back...getting worked in when either Henry or Glenn decide to hang them up. The things that worry me aren't so much his technique...since he'll have plenty of time to learn it...but his overall gameplay. He seemed to shy away from the runner. He also looked much more comfortable letting the WR get onto him...maybe thats due to his speed and how much faster he was than the competition...but that won't fly in the NFL...I would have liked to see him play more smash mouth football and jam people on the line. I don't exactly see alot of other options here...but I'm skeptical of Wade going after a kid who doesn't seem to have the physical nature that Wade would prefer.

the Laos
03-22-2007, 03:17 AM
landry, rice, hughes? A+ for vikings mock

toonsterwu
03-22-2007, 03:21 AM
Just realized that I didn't have my kickers/punters sheet with me when working through the mock ... and hence, no Mason Crosby. While I don't see Crosby as a 2nd right now, I do think he goes day 1. I'll take a peak later at some point on where to force him in. If it forces too many changes, then I won't do it, and I won't post day 2 for now, instead, likely waiting another week or so as more dominoes fall before doing another mock.

thule
03-22-2007, 03:23 AM
Just realized that I didn't have my kickers/punters sheet with me when working through the mock ... and hence, no Mason Crosby. While I don't see Crosby as a 2nd right now, I do think he goes day 1. I'll take a peak later at some point on where to force him in. If it forces too many changes, then I won't do it, and I won't post day 2 for now, instead, likely waiting another week or so as more dominoes fall before doing another mock.

I guess I don't know exactly where you are projecting Crosby at this point...but whether you buy into Jerry Jones past comments or not...Crosby could be an option for the Cowboys in round 3. Although I like the Bain pick..like I said above...his soft gameplay might rub Phillips the wrong way.

hoff04
03-22-2007, 03:27 AM
There is no way AD falls to 8 look at the Brown/Caddy/ Benson draft not all those teams needed hb but they wer too good to pass on. AD is better than all of them!

toonsterwu
03-22-2007, 03:40 AM
There is no way AD falls to 8 look at the Brown/Caddy/ Benson draft not all those teams needed hb but they wer too good to pass on. AD is better than all of them!

I agree he's a better physical talent than all three of them. But who nabs him? Oakland looks like a no, and Detroit, based on their moves, seems to be a no. Cleveland's the tough call, as my gut instinct was leaning Peterson over Quinn there, but GM's are rarely that far off, and I have to think that Rick Smith's motivation in dealing for Schaub comes with the fact that he felt Quinn would go high (and probably top 3, as the package he gave up likely could've gotten them to 4).

Outside of Cleveland, and keep in mind, this was a no-trade mock, Tampa more than likely is a no. Arizona is a sleeper ... but with Willis' working out so well, and defensive line talent, it's hard to see them go RB there when what they are potentially looking for is a young guy to develop. Washington is a no, and that leaves Minnesota. It's certainly a possibility there, one I wouldn't rule out. But Chester Taylor is a solid starter for the scheme, and they are more looking for a complementary back at best (and they have options on the roster), and at 7, they potentially could be picking a Laron Landry there who could fill a big need at safety.

In a no-trade mock, that looks to be Cleveland and Minnesota are the only potential threats, and Minnesota isn't that strong of a threat. But that's me, and maybe you see it differently.

_________________________________

Cowboys look like an option for Crosby in the third, but I'll take a peak tomorrow and think about it. If he makes it past Dallas, the next thought might be New Orleans there, as they have additional 4th rounders. BEfore Dallas, I would have to give the Giants thought due to the immediate need for it, and I'll go through the other teams.

_________________________________

One other comment - The Brown/Benson/Caddy draft was arguably one of the weakest at the top of the draft in recent memory.

ninerfan
03-22-2007, 04:03 AM
Wether I like the picks or not CONGRATS on all the legwork - well done

Caddy
03-22-2007, 06:39 AM
I don't mind the first 3 Bucs picks but I am unsure about Coe

NIN1984
03-22-2007, 07:09 AM
Stuart Schweigert may not be an elite NFL safety but he is pretty solid, Raiders did have the #1 pass defense in the NFL, Raiders will more than likely go O-line with pick #33 Kalil being a fan favorite.

T-RICH49
03-22-2007, 09:53 AM
Dude you get an A+++ on that KC Mock Draft

princefielder28
03-22-2007, 09:54 AM
Greg Olsen is a very solid pick by the Green Bay Packers and very nice mock draft in general! :)

Pit Bull #53
03-22-2007, 09:58 AM
Great job as always toon.

If our first day shapes up like this, good lord. I will go dance in the streets. Alan Branch at #19 is amazing, given my opinion of him (I know some have him dropping, though). I think the pick makes alot of sense as well if you look at the situations we're in at DT, that being, Haynesworth is a UFA after this year, and is no doubt gonna command a huge contract, and because Randy Starks at the other spot hasn't progressed (he's actually regressed a bit IMO) as well as we'd like. Love that pick.

Steve Smith in the 2nd is good. I'm of the belief that we very much need to address WR somewhere in the first 2 rounds, and I like Smith. Plus the "USC connection" and the good workouts he had make it a very plausible pick.

And Fred Bennett in the 3rd is very good as well, since Nick Harper is getting up there in age, and the uncertainty around Adam Jones. I think Bennett would have the necessary time to get coached up and not have to handle the full load right away.

I think all picks were thought out and explained well, and all made sense. Good read.

rchrd
03-22-2007, 11:46 AM
Like the mock, love the read. Apparently gotta spread the rep before giving you more...

PalmerToCJ
03-22-2007, 11:55 AM
Toon, I like the 1st rounder... He's a great fit. With that said it may be hard to pass up on Branch (as much as I don't want a DT early, but if he's our BPA..). Regardless I could see it happening so good pick.

Round 2 Merriweather is an amazing fit, his background doesn't bother me all that much but I'm afraid the FO will be gun shy (for good reason).

Still, I would love for that draft to go down.

Damix
03-22-2007, 11:37 PM
Here's my question for Giants fans: Can you really go into a critical season depending on Diehl (a guard who spots at tackle) or Whimper (an athletic OL talent that some felt was better suited at guard, but even if he was a long range tackle, the feeling was that there was a lot of technique work to do)? Maybe Whimper's progressed a lot in one year ... but it's such a critical year, not because of Coughlin, but more because of Eli. Can you go into it with just those two as the main options to protect Eli's blindside?


Will a rookie LT be much better? Especially Staley? I doubt it.

KCJ58
03-22-2007, 11:57 PM
Don't like the rams mock we dont need a corner at pick 1st round also dont like Pitcock he's going to be a bust and Bush is ok but rather have a DE or LB

Hermstheman83
03-23-2007, 12:31 AM
Yes,Yes,Yes. I love the KC draft. GOod job!

B-Dawk
03-23-2007, 12:42 AM
can't really argue with the finished product as i think all the areas of need were addressed, I am just iffy on the value that charles johnson represents in the first. Now i like him as a prospect personally, and he fits as a more complete end of the future, but it seems like his stock has been dropping lately. i guess this all comes back to what kind of safety the eagles are looking for, and I know your stance on that, so i guess this works from that standpoint, as Weddle and Griffin are not in your eyes ss, but would rather be replacements down the line for dawkins. but an overall good draft.

d34ng3l021
03-23-2007, 02:05 AM
So many explainations...you needa life mang.

Great Falcons picks...The mock would have been absolutely perfect (and I mean PERFECT) had you given us Merriweather over Tyler. We need secondary help with either a CB or FS. We have Coleman for a year or two, and we have his backup ready to step in and start as well. As for Grady...we can just draft a fatso in the later rounds for depth.

moc182
03-23-2007, 07:50 AM
Personally, I love the Giants draft. I've had Staley graded as a top 15 guy for months and to get him at 20 at arguably the most important position on the field would be outstanding. Love the Wright pick also, and Black could be a nice developmental guy.

LTgiants
03-23-2007, 09:23 AM
y couldnt u just let alan branch fall one more spot with him we would have a Dline that would be impossible to block