PDA

View Full Version : Bradysknee GRAPHICAL mock v1.0


BradysKnee
03-06-2011, 05:52 PM
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5695/mockd.jpg

33. New England Patriots - Brooks Reed, LB

****Just noticed an error
#28 should be NE receives CLE 2nd + 2012 2nd.

Heisman
03-06-2011, 08:08 PM
If we thought Ryan Mallett could be our Franchise QB, that would be the best way of going about selecting him. Good job

thebow305
03-07-2011, 12:34 AM
Great Miami draft

DiG
03-07-2011, 07:35 AM
ummm why are the skins picking 6 and why gabbert??? no chance are we trading up for gabbert. we probably would not even take him at 10.

BradysKnee
03-07-2011, 08:23 AM
ummm why are the skins picking 6 and why gabbert??? no chance are we trading up for gabbert. we probably would not even take him at 10.

Why not?
I mean, I think Gabbert is a good prospect, and you need a QB.

Seasonticketholder
03-07-2011, 12:00 PM
Cameron Heyward or Justin Houston for Saints, not Martez Wilson. You don't take a SLB in the first round unless he's a can't-miss-prospect. Wilson will not replace Vilma as our MLB so we would be selecting him to play SLB when we have bigger needs at DE and two players on the board in Heyward and Houston who could fill that need.

vidae
03-07-2011, 12:12 PM
Not sure about the trade up for KC but I love the pick.

marshallb
03-07-2011, 12:21 PM
Excellent Vikings mock. If we were able to pick up a 2nd, 4th, and 7th for Mallett and a 3rd next year(which I'd rather not give up, but it'd probably be worth it) would be excellent. If we would be able to build up the OL and either DL or S in the second that would make this an A++ draft.

I also noticed another error. The Packers pick says: "The Pittsburgh Steelers select"

txparkes49x
03-07-2011, 12:39 PM
SEXY. and a great pick. double win

SeanTaylorRIP
03-07-2011, 12:39 PM
Why not?
I mean, I think Gabbert is a good prospect, and you need a QB.

The Skins also have the need for a starter at just about every single position and I'd guess moving up to 6th would require us to trade our 2nd rounder, so that would mean our only other picks than Gabbert would start in the 5th round.

killxswitch
03-07-2011, 01:02 PM
I'd prefer Carimi to Smith but I wouldn't complain if the first round went like this for the Colts.

prock
03-07-2011, 01:03 PM
Excellent Vikings mock. If we were able to pick up a 2nd, 4th, and 7th for Mallett and a 3rd next year(which I'd rather not give up, but it'd probably be worth it) would be excellent. If we would be able to build up the OL and either DL or S in the second that would make this an A++ draft.

I also noticed another error. The Packers pick says: "The Pittsburgh Steelers select"

This. Solid VIkings draft.

49erNation85
03-07-2011, 09:34 PM
Agree great SF pick!

CJSchneider
03-07-2011, 10:24 PM
NO would be better if we grabbed Paea with pick #24. Wilson inj the first is a bit of a reach. Great Graphical mock though.

Babylon
03-07-2011, 10:32 PM
Seattle

they do need a corner.

very enjoyable.

BaLLiN
03-07-2011, 11:31 PM
I like tyron smith better for the giants than castanzo

J-Mike88
03-09-2011, 02:30 PM
Very nice usage of graphics and art, lovely.

I'll take Titus to the Packers at #32, even though it says Pittsburgh Steelers.
But I don't think our GM will ever spend a #1 pick on a WR.

He's had chances to take Crabtree and Dez Bryant back to back years and wouldn't bite. He likes getting his WRs like Jones, Jordy, Jennings in the 2nd and below rounds historically, plus Driver was a 7th rounder. With this core now, they can afford a guy who will take 2-3 years to develop and they can get a guy like that in rounds 2-5.