PDA

View Full Version : Packers O line


Pack_Attack_4
08-19-2006, 05:16 PM
Will the packers O line hold up better than the last game vs SD

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 05:21 PM
I sure hope so, but sacks arn't the only thing you have to worry about their run blocking was terrible too.

PACKmanN
08-19-2006, 05:28 PM
they got a better d-line then SD but also they dont have a 3-4 so we have to find out.

Draft King
08-19-2006, 06:07 PM
I'm going to say no just because they are facing a beast pass rush in my Falcons. :D

bearsfan_51
08-19-2006, 06:09 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 06:09 PM
I'm going to say no just because they are facing a beast pass rush in my Falcons. :D

or because they are starting two rookies?

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 06:11 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.

Draft King
08-19-2006, 06:12 PM
I'm going to say no just because they are facing a beast pass rush in my Falcons. :D

or because they are starting two rookies?

Nah, I'm going to stick with my reason. 8)

bearsfan_51
08-19-2006, 06:18 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 06:18 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?

Smooth Criminal
08-19-2006, 06:21 PM
It would be hard to do worse than that. I would expect a few games like that from the Packers this year though.

Smooth Criminal
08-19-2006, 06:22 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?

Having two guys in the middle that have never played before isn't a good thing at all. You can say they havn't played a down and they could end up being great players but they arn't going to turn into great players immediately. Expect the Packers line to get destoryed, esspecially early in the season.

roughrider30
08-19-2006, 06:22 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?

This was the first showing for some of these guys on the o-line, so lets see a couple more games before we start making calling them the worst in football.

cunningham06
08-19-2006, 06:24 PM
I think it's very possible. The Packers have the best tackle tandem IMO, Tauscher is beastly as is Clifton. Depending on how good the rookies are the interior of the O Line could be good.

Smooth Criminal
08-19-2006, 06:25 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?

This was the first showing for some of these guys on the o-line, so lets see a couple more games before we start making calling them the worst in football.

But the fact that they have never played before is what makes them the worst. Having two guys on the inside of the line that have no experience is not something that is going to make your team better. Young guys with no experience rarely turn into superstars by the season opener.

bearsfan_51
08-19-2006, 06:28 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?
Are right now. We'll see how the season develops. I'm not particularly low on either Colledge or Spitz I just don't like starting rookies..particularly when there's no competition to earn the starting spot.

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 06:56 PM
I've said all year that it's almost impossible to expect anything better than 7 wins for the Packers because of their interior line. It's the worst in football and isn't really all that well supported by a mediocre supporting cast.

I'm not trying to defend their O-line, because its bad right now... but it's kinda hard to say they are the worst when they have two players who havent played a real football game yet, but yeah they are certianly not good.
That's exactely why they are the worst.

you mean will be, or could be?
Are right now. We'll see how the season develops. I'm not particularly low on either Colledge or Spitz I just don't like starting rookies..particularly when there's no competition to earn the starting spot.

oh i agree ,they were bolth terrible last game,and i am disapointed with them so far. college isnt starting tonight moll is.

Canadian_kid16
08-19-2006, 07:30 PM
IDK, but shouldn't this be in the team discussion thread??

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 07:40 PM
IDK, but shouldn't this be in the team discussion thread??

who cares? he probably wanted input from fans from around the league.

Material Issues
08-19-2006, 07:54 PM
with colledge and spitz adding to the interior i could see them return to perivous glory.

The Legend
08-19-2006, 08:42 PM
1st half no sacks i blive

Vince Lombardi
08-19-2006, 09:01 PM
But the fact that they have never played before is what makes them the worst.

No it doesn't, it makes them the most unproven. They could very well end up playing better when the games actually count. I'm not saying that they're gonna step in and be great right away, more likely there will be a fair share of struggles, but you can't say anybody is the best or worst until the games have been played.

GB12
08-19-2006, 10:05 PM
IDK, but shouldn't this be in the team discussion thread??

who cares? he probably wanted input from fans from around the league.

and he probably wanted the poll. I think it was better than last time

TitleTown088
08-19-2006, 11:03 PM
But the fact that they have never played before is what makes them the worst.

No it doesn't, it makes them the most unproven. They could very well end up playing better when the games actually count. I'm not saying that they're gonna step in and be great right away, more likely there will be a fair share of struggles, but you can't say anybody is the best or worst until the games have been played.

exactly