PDA

View Full Version : Your Joe Gibbs, whose your starting QB Vs. Colts?


FloridaFootball
10-15-2006, 07:33 PM
Okay, I'm embarrased with the Titans beating the Redskins today. Brunell played like crap. Would make 1 or 2 plays, and they do some stuff that left you scratching your head.

Your Joe Gibbs, your team is now 2-4. A 36 year old QB who is most likely going to retire in a year or two. Would you start Brunell for the rest of the season or put Jason Campbell in there to get experience?

The future is now..(http://youtube.com/watch?v=cNQUB_IpuK4)

I want to know what someones opinion thats not a redskins fan is.

bearsfan_51
10-15-2006, 07:34 PM
You're.

Shiver
10-15-2006, 07:34 PM
They are the worst team in that division, they need to get Campbell reps. Take the licks now, win later.

The Unseen
10-15-2006, 07:34 PM
Make it his last-straw game. If he sucks, it's over.

Geo
10-15-2006, 07:36 PM
Have you seen their schedule? It's already over, they aren't winning another game this season.

Play Campbell now for the benefit of the future.

The Unseen
10-15-2006, 07:36 PM
Eh...it's just me. I'm making the decisions here. :wink:

sodar21
10-15-2006, 07:37 PM
Try and stop the run.

10-15-2006, 07:37 PM
If i were Joe Gibbs it wouldn't matter because I would run all game

smittyjs
10-15-2006, 07:37 PM
Jason Campbell

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
10-15-2006, 07:44 PM
Have you seen their schedule? It's already over, they aren't winning another game this season.

Play Campbell now for the benefit of the future.

I like the Redskins, but I hope that happens since the Broncos are my favorite team and they'll get a top 5 pick!! Can anyone say... CALVIN JOHNSON IS A BRONCO?? Lol, the skins probly wont do that bad, but still, I'm excited.

SeanTaylorRIP
10-15-2006, 07:52 PM
http://img23.imagevenue.com/loc373/th_44314_daggadfg_122_373lo.JPG (http://img23.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=44314_daggadfg_122_373lo.JPG)http://img145.imagevenue.com/loc311/th_44318_dfgdfhf_122_311lo.JPG (http://img145.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=44318_dfgdfhf_122_311lo.JPG)http://img40.imagevenue.com/loc324/th_44322_dasfadsg_122_324lo.JPG (http://img40.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_44322_dasfadsg_122_324lo.JPG)http ://img161.imagevenue.com/loc397/th_44324_dgadgs_122_397lo.JPG (http://img161.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_44324_dgadgs_122_397lo.JPG)

draftguru151
10-15-2006, 07:53 PM
http://img23.imagevenue.com/loc373/th_44314_daggadfg_122_373lo.JPG (http://img23.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=44314_daggadfg_122_373lo.JPG)http://img145.imagevenue.com/loc311/th_44318_dfgdfhf_122_311lo.JPG (http://img145.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=44318_dfgdfhf_122_311lo.JPG)http://img40.imagevenue.com/loc324/th_44322_dasfadsg_122_324lo.JPG (http://img40.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_44322_dasfadsg_122_324lo.JPG)http ://img161.imagevenue.com/loc397/th_44324_dgadgs_122_397lo.JPG (http://img161.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_44324_dgadgs_122_397lo.JPG)

QFT.

Basileus777
10-15-2006, 07:58 PM
Brunell sucks and the Redskins have almost no chance of seeing the postseason. Start Campbell and see what you have in him.

If the Skins drop too many games and Campbell sucks, they can draft a qb with their high draft pick....oh wait thats going to Denver. Well at least they have Duckett.

Staubach12
10-15-2006, 08:16 PM
Brunell sucks and the Redskins have almost no chance of seeing the postseason. Start Campbell and see what you have in him.

If the Skins drop too many games and Campbell sucks, they can draft a qb with their high draft pick....oh wait thats going to Denver. Well at least they have Duckett.

That deal was one of th dumbest things. The skins could have a top 5-10 pick, but the Broncs will be picking there...

Anyway, I say put in Cambell.

Vikes99ej
10-15-2006, 08:19 PM
I'd say put in Campbell. I still don't know why the Redskins are so bad.

Jensen
10-15-2006, 08:24 PM
Antwaan Randle El.

Go_Eli
10-15-2006, 08:29 PM
With Brunell, you MIGHT have a chance against the Colts.

With Campbell, you're basically saying you know you'll lose.

Geo
10-15-2006, 08:29 PM
Start Campbell now, get him as much experience in this Al Saunders offense as possible so you can build for 2007. While other parts of this team are still young (e.g. Clinton Portis).

Eli Manning didn't start until Week 11 in his rookie year, and with the talent around him he was able to lead the Giants to a division title the next year.

Washington has a favorable 2007 schedule, they play the NFC North, the AFC East, and the respective division-ranked team in the NFC South and the NFC West. For those who don't want to think that out (there's some of you, I know), it looks as follows:

Washington 2007 opponents
Dallas (x2)
New York Giants (x2)
Philadelphia (x2)
Chicago
@ Green Bay
Detroit
@ Minnesota
Buffalo
@ New England
Miami
@ New York Jets
NFC West [Arizona]
@ NFC South [Tampa Bay]

Basileus777
10-15-2006, 08:30 PM
With Brunell, you MIGHT have a chance against the Colts.

With Campbell, you're basically saying you know you'll lose.

Peyton is going to eat that Redskin secondary alive. Unless the Skins can find their defense in the next week, I don't fancy their chances.

The Unseen
10-15-2006, 08:34 PM
Are his stats THAT misleading? He's completing 64% of his passes for a 7.6 YPA and a 90.8 QB rating. It's not like he's an INT machine like Bledsoe, he's thrown two.

jsagan77
10-15-2006, 08:36 PM
Don't get your hopes up bronco fans.. You won't be gettin our pick.. The deal was that we COULD exchange picks IF it equaled a 3rd rounder.. At the most being 1 or 2 spots.. You won't be getting our #1 pick...

RCAChainGang
10-15-2006, 08:38 PM
He isn't gonna bench Mark. You might want him to, but he is not. Plus you guys will still have a chance at beating us. Look, you almost beat the titans and they almost beat us.

Dam8610
10-15-2006, 08:45 PM
If i were Joe Gibbs it wouldn't matter because I would run all game

QFST

thegame26
10-15-2006, 08:45 PM
We should bench brunell and bring in campbell but joe gibbs is loyal to his qbs so until we are actually elminated from the playoffs we are going to leave brunell in and that sucks

thegame26
10-15-2006, 08:46 PM
i still dont understand how you only give portis the ball 14 times, saunders needs to be shot

thegame26
10-15-2006, 08:47 PM
I'd say put in Campbell. I still don't know why the Redskins are so bad.

easy because we have a sorry defense and a sorry offense

Dam8610
10-15-2006, 08:48 PM
i still dont understand how you only give portis the ball 14 times, saunders needs to be shot

I hope Saunders continues to use this type of ingenious offensive philosophy nest week.

Basileus777
10-15-2006, 08:50 PM
i still dont understand how you only give portis the ball 14 times, saunders needs to be shot

The Titans run defense isn't any good either, especially without Haynesworth. Saunders is known to KC fans for out-thinking himself and being unwilling to go with the smart play choice over the more aggressive one.

I don't get how Gibbs can bench Ramsey after a quarter, but stick with Brunell no matter what.

The Unseen
10-15-2006, 08:54 PM
I don't get how Gibbs can bench Ramsey after a quarter, but stick with Brunell no matter what.

http://images.washtimes.com/photos/web/20040108-111717-6173.jpg

"He's a competitor"

thegame26
10-15-2006, 08:59 PM
i still dont understand how you only give portis the ball 14 times, saunders needs to be shot

The Titans run defense isn't any good either, especially without Haynesworth. Saunders is known to KC fans for out-thinking himself and being unwilling to go with the smart play choice over the more aggressive one.

I don't get how Gibbs can bench Ramsey after a quarter, but stick with Brunell no matter what.

Well odly enough this is the only reason i know that jason campbell will get a fair chance, he benched ramsey cause he didnt like him and he wasnt joe gibbs QB brunell is and campbell is was a hand picked qb by gibbs so he is gonna get his shot but it wont be until we lose our 10th game and that should be in about 7 weeks

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
10-15-2006, 08:59 PM
Don't get your hopes up bronco fans.. You won't be gettin our pick.. The deal was that we COULD exchange picks IF it equaled a 3rd rounder.. At the most being 1 or 2 spots.. You won't be getting our #1 pick...

I thought the Broncos got the right to swap picks, so if the Redskins finished lower they get the Skins pick.

Basileus777
10-15-2006, 09:04 PM
Don't get your hopes up bronco fans.. You won't be gettin our pick.. The deal was that we COULD exchange picks IF it equaled a 3rd rounder.. At the most being 1 or 2 spots.. You won't be getting our #1 pick...

I thought the Broncos got the right to swap picks, so if the Redskins finished lower they get the Skins pick.

Its not that simple, depending on where the Skins end up the Broncos could get a 3rd and a 4th instead. There is a whole different set of outcomes depending on where the Skins end up drafting.

RCAChainGang
10-15-2006, 09:13 PM
I don't get how Gibbs can bench Ramsey after a quarter, but stick with Brunell no matter what.

http://images.washtimes.com/photos/web/20040108-111717-6173.jpg

"He's a competitor"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Iamcanadian
10-15-2006, 10:31 PM
Not a Redskins fan at all, but I cannot see Gibbs giving up on Brunell until the 7th or 8 th game. 7 or 8 starts would easily be enough to prepare Campbell for next season. Coaches like Gibbs and Parcells won't give up on a season until they are absolutely sure they cannot make the playoffs.

BlindSite
10-16-2006, 12:29 AM
I don't know why they all but abandoned the run.

diabsoule
10-16-2006, 12:37 AM
Campbell is the future and the 'Skins aren't making the playoffs. Brunell is slightly injured and is too old.

Basileus777
10-16-2006, 10:47 AM
I don't know why they all but abandoned the run.

Vintage Al Saunders. Reminds me of the Buffalo game last year when Roaf was out. Schobel was owning Jordan Black and Green was running for his life and Saunders wouldn't run LJ. We lost.

LonghornsLegend
10-16-2006, 10:55 AM
Brunell sucks and the Redskins have almost no chance of seeing the postseason. Start Campbell and see what you have in him.

If the Skins drop too many games and Campbell sucks, they can draft a qb with their high draft pick....oh wait thats going to Denver. Well at least they have Duckett.

That deal was one of th dumbest things. The skins could have a top 5-10 pick, but the Broncs will be picking there...

Anyway, I say put in Cambell.


cause the skins are stupid, they do that every year, always trade their first rd pick knowing good and well its a chance they could use it...they will do the same thing this year, they will trade a 2nd rd after this draft to get back into the first....


not going to be fair the broncos as good as they are get that high of a pick, what a steal, they can take bpa at that point....


if i were gibbs id play cambell, alot of times something new sparks a team into playing better, he does have weapons to use, for all they know he ends up playing better...if not at draft time they wont take a qb, but they know where they stand as far as cambells progress


*edit* forgot to add


:lol: :lol: :lol: @ all the money they spent again in the offseason

7 receptions, 127 yds and no td's....


what a way to spend 29 million, and a 3rd and 4th rd draftpick :lol:


honestly, did they not think they could of found a wr at 1000x better value in the 3rd rd, and went defense in the 4th, that was extremely too much for a WR who only topped out at 700 yds in his best year, sorry but if i was a skins fan i would be sick at the way they did business in the offseason....

always trading away picks, and over spending, in the worst way

Basileus777
10-16-2006, 01:15 PM
The Skins just signed Troy Vincent. Somehow I doubt it will fix that secondary unless they are going to use him to replace Archuleta.

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=21078

Shiver
10-16-2006, 02:51 PM
This off-season showed why the Redskins will not be a serious contender with Snyder at the helm:

Brandon Lloyd
Antwan Randle-El
Adam Archuleta
Andre Carter
TJ Duckett


They overspent for all of them, and have received little production.

SeanTaylorRIP
10-16-2006, 02:56 PM
This off-season showed why the Redskins will not be a serious contender with Snyder at the helm:

Brandon Lloyd
Antwan Randle-El
Adam Archuleta
Andre Carter
TJ Duckett


They overspent for all of them, and have received little production.

Lloyd would be good if Brunell could throw downfield we saw with his 60 yard catch yesterday that if thrown to he can pull it down. Randle was overpayed but he has been solid with the few chances he's had. Arch was way overpaying he sux Ryan Clark was better and 21 million cheaper. Andre Carter is starting to pick it up and should have around 10 sacks by years end, and Duckett well I'm not even gonna say anything.

FloridaFootball
10-16-2006, 03:17 PM
Redskins will have their top 10 pick.


http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/9616229
"Depending on how each team fares this season, the two teams also could wind up swapping first-round picks, but only if Washington is scheduled to pick between No. 21 and No. 31 and Denver's first-round draft position is even higher. Unlikely, though not impossible."

SeanTaylorRIP
10-16-2006, 03:30 PM
Redskins will have their top 10 pick.


http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/9616229
"Depending on how each team fares this season, the two teams also could wind up swapping first-round picks, but only if Washington is scheduled to pick between No. 21 and No. 31 and Denver's first-round draft position is even higher. Unlikely, though not impossible."
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have made my day.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
10-16-2006, 03:55 PM
Redskins will have their top 10 pick.


http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/9616229
"Depending on how each team fares this season, the two teams also could wind up swapping first-round picks, but only if Washington is scheduled to pick between No. 21 and No. 31 and Denver's first-round draft position is even higher. Unlikely, though not impossible."
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have made my day.


I hate you.

Burned_By_Santana
10-16-2006, 05:01 PM
Umm...I agree with the guy who said start Randle El. By the way...someone stole my GD avatar. BURN BABY BURN! :twisted:

Start McIntosh too while you're at it. Holdman cant hold my nut sack.

Geo
10-16-2006, 07:09 PM
That's interesting about Washington, not willing to play the young guys.

Whereas you see good teams like the Patriots, Colts, Bears, etc. do so continually.

thegame26
10-16-2006, 07:12 PM
Joe Gibbs said today that if he thought that Brunell was the main problem he would bench him in a heart beat. I hate brunell as much as the next guy but honestly its the defenses fault we suck so bad.

critesy
10-16-2006, 08:05 PM
REDSKINS WILL STILL WIN THE SUPERBOWL, WATCH!



:)

Go_Eli
10-16-2006, 08:24 PM
Joe Gibbs said today that if he thought that Brunell was the main problem he would bench him in a heart beat. I hate brunell as much as the next guy but honestly its the defenses fault we suck so bad.

When your offense can't do anything, its their fault. They could be doing so much more, but its coaching and execution.

manning18
10-19-2006, 02:27 AM
Why does it matter? It's not like they're gonna win. :lol:


J/k but I would give Brunell his last chance this game.