PDA

View Full Version : Falcons' rookies get jersey numbers!


Shiver
05-03-2007, 06:05 PM
Jamaal Anderson - #98
Justin Blalock - #63
Chris Houston - #23
Laurent Robinson - #19
Stephen Nicholas - #54
Martrez Milner - #88
David Irons - #30
Doug Datish - #61
Daren Stone - #39
Jason Snelling - #44

iloxygenil
05-03-2007, 07:02 PM
I'm not sure which is my favorite! EEP! lol. I am a big fan of 98, but I am also a big fan of #19. Then again I can't get away from liking #23 and #39 as well =)

d34ng3l021
05-03-2007, 07:02 PM
98. Not bad. If he does have a beast season I might get his jersey...Doubt I will get another CB jersey.

thefalconer
05-03-2007, 09:00 PM
houston - 23 would look nice.

DraftMichaelHuff
05-04-2007, 01:00 AM
#23 is pretty cool for Houston, i dunno why Jimmy went with #24 tho last year i think #22 would been better.
Finally if i was Jamal id of taken #99 thats a cool number, but then again if i was Jamal i wouldnt of worn that horrendus suit to his first press conference after being drafted he looked like a bum

georgiafan
05-07-2007, 11:24 AM
I hate it when WR dont have #'s in the 80's

iloxygenil
05-07-2007, 12:29 PM
I actually like it a lot when they do that =) 19 is going to look pimp flyin around the field.

DraftMichaelHuff
05-08-2007, 08:04 AM
I actually like it a lot when they do that =) 19 is going to look pimp flyin around the field.

Agree #10 would be my number as a WR, that number has potential, like if you were an elite WR the #10 jersey (as a WR) would just be assoiciated with you, its original, simple and looks good IMO

I got no support with the comment on Jamaal's suit you guys mustn't of seen the press conference

iloxygenil
05-08-2007, 12:25 PM
I saw it...it looked like it had been in his closet for quite some time. His mom must have wanted him to wear it so they didn't waste money on a new one without having used that one.

Shiver
05-08-2007, 12:40 PM
You can't have #10 as a receiver. It's either;

11-19

80-89

D-Rod
05-08-2007, 03:00 PM
I saw it...it looked like it had been in his closet for quite some time. His mom must have wanted him to wear it so they didn't waste money on a new one without having used that one.

Yes, it was horrendous, but I blame the team, not him. They should've taken him straight out to get a suit fitted. Also, bear in mind: there aren't many places where you can get a suit off the rack for a guy who is 6'6" and 280lbs.

Still, yuck.

iloxygenil
05-08-2007, 06:50 PM
Haha, that's for sure.

Bem1
05-09-2007, 09:54 PM
You can't have #10 as a receiver. It's either;

11-19

80-89
http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/061231/061231_holmes_vmed_2p.widec.jpg
http://www.mlive.com/cgi-bin/prxy/weblog_photos/nph-cache.cgi/cache=3000;/mtlogs/mlive_fantasyrankings/images/holmes.jpg
http://images.footballfanatics.com/productImages/_127000/FF_127661_s.jpg
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20061009/images/sp_chjumping.jpg
yep 11-19

Shiver
05-09-2007, 10:50 PM
How I forgot Santonio Holmes, I don't know. I stand corrected.

iloxygenil
05-09-2007, 11:20 PM
Wow Bem...lol + rep for you =)

DraftMichaelHuff
05-10-2007, 03:25 AM
thats crazy, when you said 11-19 i kept thinkin there was one WR with #10. When i remembered it was Holmes i thought id come on here and point that out.... but bem was too quick! #10 is so under-used it has massive potential market wise IMO, kinda like what vick has done with #7. It woulda been cool if a guy like CJ took it and made it his own.
I do hate when TE's were numbers in the 40's tho like Dallas Clark #44 terrible

thefalconer
05-10-2007, 08:41 PM
yeah i hate clar's jersey. 44 is a fb number imo.

iloxygenil
05-10-2007, 09:02 PM
Snelling is going to be a FB / HB / H-back type guy, he's not going to be just a tailback here.