Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

playoff system or bowl system?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    so a team like boise state gets into the plays offs just because they had a crap schedule and went undefeated? yeah, this seems like a better alternative :roll:
    Fight On USC Trojans!

    gamertag: uscfan06

    Comment


    • #17
      The BCS worked out good this year. It proved that Michigan was not worthy of being at the top and a shot for the NC. It also showed how Florida was the legit team to play there. No matter what certain schools fans thought should be done, it was done correctly. The only playoff game or final game to consider would maybe Florida and USC. That way we would at least get to see 1 more a good game.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by TCU
        Originally posted by soybean
        Originally posted by cgrsly57
        A four team playoff is all thats needed. In the history of the BCS there has never been a team outside of the top four that has been deserving except maybe this year with Boise.
        so this year it would have been: OSU, Michigan, Florida, LSU? what about SC?

        4 team is an even worse idea because you cant narrow it down to 4

        OSU Michigan Florida LSU Louisville Wisconsin USC Boise Oklahoma Auburn

        good luck pleasing more people with a "playoff"


        the BCS has it right they have a playoff its a two team playoff that works.
        you can't take a single year and extrapolate it across every year. what about the years in which there were\are 3 undefeated teams at year's end? that "two team playoff" garbage you espouse sure worked wonders.

        but yeah, i'm sure there'd be just as much outcry over a 1-loss team missing the final four as there is a 1-loss team missing the BCS for a 2-loss team or an undefeated team. :roll:

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by RWFender1
          so a team like boise state gets into the plays offs just because they had a crap schedule and went undefeated? yeah, this seems like a better alternative :roll:
          so you're saying that a team like nebraska gets into the championship game because the computers decided that the #4 ranking was meaningless? yeah, much better alternative. or in 2003, when there was no clear national champion because there were three, more or less equal one loss teams? yeah, glad we didn't get to see LSU and USC play. great alternative there.

          Comment


          • #20
            there has never been a team outside of the top four that has been deserving except maybe this year with Boise.
            I dont believe Boise is deserving. Teams know going into the season that if they dont schedule hard teams they risk not being ranked as high.

            Boise barely beat the #7 ranked team in Oklahoma who allready had 2 loses. They beat them by many trick plays, where if one didnt work the game would have been lost. The top 5 teams in the country would have all beaten Boise.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by brownsfan
              there has never been a team outside of the top four that has been deserving except maybe this year with Boise.
              I dont believe Boise is deserving. Teams know going into the season that if they dont schedule hard teams they risk not being ranked as high.

              Boise barely beat the #7 ranked team in Oklahoma who allready had 2 loses. They beat them by many trick plays, where if one didnt work the game would have been lost. The top 5 teams in the country would have all beaten Boise.
              Did you even read the whole post? I said that there needs to be a 4 team playoff in which case Boise wouldnt have gotten in. With that being said its ridiculous to say that "The top 5 teams in the country would have all beaten Boise". Boise beat an oregon state team that beat USC but im sure USC would have no problem destroying Boise.... :roll:

              Comment


              • #22
                I think college football should have a combination of both playoffs and bowls. The top teams (4, 8, however many you want) should get into the playoffs and then the rest of the teams should have bowl games minus the BCS. These playoff games can still be sponsored by big name companies so college football losing money doesn't really have to be an issue. And the other schools play in bowl games which could serve as a consolation sort of like the post-season NIT in college basketball.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by ndctu1138
                  I think college football should have a combination of both playoffs and bowls. The top teams (4, 8, however many you want) should get into the playoffs and then the rest of the teams should have bowl games minus the BCS. These playoff games can still be sponsored by big name companies so college football losing money doesn't really have to be an issue. And the other schools play in bowl games which could serve as a consolation sort of like the post-season NIT in college basketball.
                  yea..........but.................................. ....................


                  Lionsmack

                  Originally posted by elway777
                  They should invite Reggie Ball to the Draft just to make him feel uncomfortable.
                  The Lions will sweep the Vikings in 2007.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    An 8 team playoff would be so easy to do.

                    Take a week or 2 off after the Conf. Champ. games. Play first wek, 2nd week and then another week off and then a Champ. Game. It's smart and you could still have ALL those other teams in their regular bowls. They need to do it.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Playoff, or make the season start a bit earlier and have bowl games right after the season, nobody wants to see this deluded football played 50 days after the season ended. It makes for bad games, and doesn't do either of the teams any justice.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        A +1 is the way to go.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          why cant there be both?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I agree. I like watching the Bowl Games. I think there should be a playoff for top 12 teams, like NFL, and Bowl Games for the rest.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X

                            Debug Information