Ohio might get a USC type Punishment

[dannyz]

This could be one of the big stories about to Break.http://sportales.com/football/source...jor-sanctions/

* All victories from the 2009 and 2010 season will be vacated
* Will not be televised for the 2011 season
* Will not be allowed to partake in post season bowl games for 2011 or 2012.
* Will lose 10 scholarships in 2011, and 5 per year in 2012 and 2013.
I will be pissed if they don't put the Ohio State - Nebraska Game on TV.

[JoeJoeBrown]

This link is about as stupid as it gets. It's just some guy hypothesizing.

And dannyz, it's Ohio State. Ohio is a different school all together.

[HindSight]

they really swung for the fences on that one

[dannyz]

I just saw it and posted it here.

[P-L]

There is no way that's true. That would be the harshest punishment the NCAA has handed out since the SMU death penalty. Why would Ohio State have to vacate 2009 wins when all of the violations happened in 2010?

[iowatreat54]

Just curious, how would the NCAA enforce them not being on TV? I mean for like the BTN they could, but what if like NBC wants to show the game? The NCAA would have absolutely no way to punish NBC for showing the game, would they?

Maybe if it's a network that has other contracts with the NCAA/schools (like NBC with ND) they could have something in those that they can do something, but I just don't get how that can be enforced..

[descendency]

Ohio is a different school all together.

But every group of graduates spell O-H-I-O :(

---

This article is BS. I hate tOSU as much as most michigan fans, but literally no one else is even willing to speculate this is coming. It's just something they made up.

edit: When the article was first posted, it was full of spelling errors and such. No respectable journalist would ever release a story with that many errors.

[MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)]

There is no way that's true. That would be the harshest punishment the NCAA has handed out since the SMU death penalty. Why would Ohio State have to vacate 2009 wins when all of the violations happened in 2010?

Because **** OSU, that's why.

[marks01234]

There is no way that's true. That would be the harshest punishment the NCAA has handed out since the SMU death penalty. Why would Ohio State have to vacate 2009 wins when all of the violations happened in 2010?

UNC is going to set the new standard as far as punishments.

OSU won't be to far behind though.

[wicket]

Just curious, how would the NCAA enforce them not being on TV? I mean for like the BTN they could, but what if like NBC wants to show the game? The NCAA would have absolutely no way to punish NBC for showing the game, would they?

Maybe if it's a network that has other contracts with the NCAA/schools (like NBC with ND) they could have something in those that they can do something, but I just don't get how that can be enforced..

well its pretty easy, Ohio State would have to accept the film crews on campus so they have it pretty easy for home games, road games might be a tougher story

[yodabear]

And that TV thing would be stupid as ****. Why punish the other teams like Nebraska, Michigan, Wisconsin, and others by not putting them on TV when they nothing wrong?

[wordofi]

Kind of surprising that they didn't wait until they started to suck like they did with USC.

[cajuncorey]

cheat to win!

[Tom Servo]

Wouldn't matter. Bucks would still own the Big Ten.

[CrankthatCrabtree]

Its a hard rain a coming in tOSU.

Tressel shows what a ************* scumbag he is. So awesome. All those tOSU snobs who would stick their nose up at the SEC can now choke on a dick