Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the NFL adopt the NBA's rookie contract system

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should the NFL adopt the NBA's rookie contract system

    In the NBA you get paid according to your slot in the draft. It doesn't matter if you could of been in top 10(brady quinn). You get paid for your slot you were selected in and there is no negotiations. There are no rookie holdouts either. Another thing I just don't understand how a guy who hasn't played a down in the NFL, should be making more money than some of the best players in the NFL. Thoughts???

  • #2
    The NFLPA would never do it. I don't think it's a bad idea at all, a system like that can get your rookies in on time, less negotiations hassles and so forth. But the NFL is a business, and in a sport where there are no guarantees and and a risk of injury on every single snap, more then any other sport, rookies and agents are going to want get as much as they can, as soon as they can. Which is nothing new, I'm just stating the obvious.

    Comment


    • #3
      I would like to see the system implemented. The fact that JaMarcus Russell is going to get an amount of guaranteed money that's close to the amount Peyton Manning got is ridiculous.


      The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

      If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

      <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
      <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

      Comment


      • #4
        without question and without discussion. YES!!


        Courtesy of Fenikz - Much Appreciated

        Originally posted by dRaFtDoRk
        You can't be a good corner if no one throws your way. Thats my way of seeing it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Dam8610 View Post
          I would like to see the system implemented. The fact that JaMarcus Russell is going to get an amount of guaranteed money that's close to the amount Peyton Manning got is ridiculous.
          that i agree with...an uproven player...he could be a bust....but will get more money then one of the best to play the posistion?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Denver Bronco56 View Post
            that i agree with...an uproven player...he could be a bust....but will get more money then one of the best to play the posistion?
            Not more, but he's going to get around $30 million in guarantees. Peyton got $35 million in guarantees.


            The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

            If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

            <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
            <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by njx9
              i'm not sure the NFLPA wouldn't buy it. i mean, who are the current members of the NFLPA? veteran players. who stands to profit the most from increased cap room created by a tiered rookie salary structure? veteran players. i'm not sure why the NFLPA would stand against that, assuming the rookie contracts were, as in the NBA, 3ish year contracts with more guaranteed money.
              Interesting, makes sense. But despite the recent grumblings against Upshaw and company, they do want to look our for th best interest of there players, including the rookies who will soon be the faces and stars of this league. But I do see what you mean though, there could be a little "look out for #1" mentality from the veteran players on this matter. But I'm pretty sure this proposal has been brought up before, so something must have been holding it back.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by njx9
                absolutely. and i wouldn't be surprised if i was off a bit on what i'm expecting. but i dunno. it seems to make too muh sense not to happen. maybe someone just needs to let upshaw know that teams won't suddenly stop paying salaries the max out the cap limitations because they don't have to spend it on rookies. all those players are far more likely to get a big pay day after 3 seasons, when they actually deserve it. but then, maybe that's the point? i mean, the raiders can be reasonably sure that russell will be their property for 5-7 years. if the NBA structure were implemented, there wouldn't be any guarantees at the end point. i can see that being a holding point where the NFLPA wants its guys completely free to get a payday and the NFL owners want to be able to keep their talented players (and probably have league rules in place so they don't need to pay them market value).

                *shrug*
                Maybe they could make it so that after the rookie contract, they became restricted FAs. I think that's how it happens in the NBA.


                Originally posted by Scott Wright
                Terrellezzzzzzzz Pryorzzzzzzzz!
                Originally posted by njx9
                do i tell you when to flip the burger?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yes without a doubt. I would rather see teams have enough money to keep their own vets around rather than have to cut people to sign their own rookies. Plus it would get every rookie into camp on time and without a problem.

                  Only people that don't benefit are the incoming rookies and the agents.

                  Thanks to The Dynasty for the sig

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I bet the NFL could get the NFLPA to bite on this by removing the franchise tag or limiting it to 1 time per player in his career, or something like that. I think the owners would like this system, and the players might take that kind of a swap.



                    I am "America's Poster"... http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/for...9&postcount=25

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Rookie contracts are absurd. Calvin Johnson is the highest paid WR in the NFL before he steps onto a football field. I know there are incentives in rookie contracts, but look at the max value of Johnson's compared to contract of the former highest paid WR, Marvin Harrison.

                      Calvin Johnson - 6 years, $64 million, $27.2 million guaranteed
                      Marvin Harrison - 7 years, $67 million, $23 million guaranteed

                      Sure, Calvin will likely not meet all of the incentives in his contract, but it's still way too much. Even if he meets none of his incentives, he'll likely still have a contract that is top 5 at his position.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I think a more defined contract structure would benefit everyone in the long run. Players get into camp on time, they get their second/third contracts sooner, there's more FA's out there, and teams aren't hampered by bad contracts as much. I would allow the rookie/team to choose several different options and slots based on the draft position. You have to build in clauses that prevent the team from immediately renegotiating the contracts until after the first year. What I fear will happen is that rookies will hold out in their first training camp demanding a new contract before their careers even begin.



                        I am "America's Poster"... http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/for...9&postcount=25

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If I'm the owners, I'd gladly get rid of the franchise tag in exchange for the long-term benefit of slotted contracts for rookies. Of course, under my last post, I outlined a plausible situation, with the team renegotiating the contract almost immediately. I think they have to have some sort of requirement that the contract be in force for 2 seasons or something for the owners to really get any sort of benefit.



                          I am "America's Poster"... http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/for...9&postcount=25

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            it's a salary cap thing too. When Harrisson and Manning signed their deals the cap was smaller hence the amount of money payed was relatively bigger, not arguing the amounts the rooks are getting payed are insane, but it is something to keep in mind.

                            As far as the NBA system... I don't think that's all that convenient.

                            Sig by Fenikz

                            I remember NFLDC
                            don't tell anyone, but Charlie Casserly is a dope fiend

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Seriously, how does an NBA-style contract system for rookie contracts make things inconvenient? Slotted contracts make things easier. Sure, the rookies aren't happy with it, but they also get their next big payday much sooner. I'm not suggesting that contracts should be as small as the NBA rookie scale, but there would be a lot of guaranteed money there. I think it benefits everyone because the breakout stars will get a second contract sooner, and the busts get their money up front, then can move on with minimal repurcussions to the drafting team.



                              I am "America's Poster"... http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/for...9&postcount=25

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information