If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anyhow, I think this rules out DT. Dorsey is likely out. He's the best UT, but you aren't likely to go Dorsey/Kelly in there. I don't think you draft a 4-3 NT this high, so that may rule out Ellis.
It wouldn't surprise me if this move clears their way for
That said, I don't see them looking Otah, and Clady has to work his way up again.
Thus, as of now, my guess at 4 would be Gholston, because, while Clemons is nice, he's not really an everydown end. Even if you believe he can be, Burgess is getting up there, and having Gholston learn and develop would be nice. Certainly fits the physical specimen mold that may intrigue Al.
Wouldn't it have been more prudent to..yanno, give Nmandi some of that money instead? You know, because..he's a lock down corner? Rather than invest it in an average DT?
Meh. Perhaps that's just me. What do Raiders fans think of this deal in general? Worth it? Slightly overpaid? A total steal? I haven't seen any of Tommy Kelly, but I don't see how he could be of more value compared to Nmandi.