Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

what to do

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    I think he'll do fine I just would rather have Quinn
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pooQi...eature=related

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Geo View Post
      First option, of course.



      Sorgi is a natural leader of men. Also, he's going to retire with more rings than Favre.
      Didn't you mean to say Sorgi is a God among men? Great hidden message, by the way, bravo.


      The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

      If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

      <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
      <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by tjpackers View Post
        I think he'll do fine I just would rather have Quinn
        Tell me after the next couple of years if you'd rather have Quinn or Rodgers and Harrell.


        The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

        If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

        <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
        <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Dam8610 View Post
          Tell me after the next couple of years if you'd rather have Quinn or Rodgers and Harrell.
          I think the better question would be Quinn and Braylon Edwards or Rodgers and Harrell. I would personally go with Edwards because he is a top-5 WR in this league.


          Originally posted by Halsey
          I don't have to watch it to know it was not interesting.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Turtlepower View Post
            I think the better question would be Quinn and Braylon Edwards or Rodgers and Harrell. I would personally go with Edwards because he is a top-5 WR in this league.
            Good luck getting Braylon Edwards at #24 in the 2005 draft.


            The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

            If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

            <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
            <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Dam8610 View Post
              Good luck getting Braylon Edwards at #24 in the 2005 draft.
              I'm saying that the Browns had a choice with Edwards or Rodgers and they chose Edwards. I think they made the right choice.


              Originally posted by Halsey
              I don't have to watch it to know it was not interesting.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Turtlepower View Post
                I'm saying that the Browns had a choice with Edwards or Rodgers and they chose Edwards. I think they made the right choice.
                Of course they made the right choice, but they were a struggling franchise in need of a talent infusion at just about every position, so picking the best player available made sense for them. The Browns' situation has absolutely nothing to do with what the Packers could've done back then or in 2007. If you want to give another option that the Packers could've picked at 24 that year that they reasonably would have with the 24th pick to go along with Quinn, be my guest, but to say Quinn and Edwards vs. Rodgers and Harrell is a totally unfair comparison, because the Packers never could've had Quinn and Edwards.


                The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

                If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

                <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
                <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Dam8610 View Post
                  Of course they made the right choice, but they were a struggling franchise in need of a talent infusion at just about every position, so picking the best player available made sense for them. The Browns' situation has absolutely nothing to do with what the Packers could've done back then or in 2007. If you want to give another option that the Packers could've picked at 24 that year that they reasonably would have with the 24th pick to go along with Quinn, be my guest, but to say Quinn and Edwards vs. Rodgers and Harrell is a totally unfair comparison, because the Packers never could've had Quinn and Edwards.
                  I'll give you that, but I just disagree with lumping Harrell into the situation. I feel that those two picks should be kept independent of each other because I'm sure if they didn't draft Rodgers in 05, they may have drafted Leinart in 06.


                  Originally posted by Halsey
                  I don't have to watch it to know it was not interesting.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Turtlepower View Post
                    I'll give you that, but I just disagree with lumping Harrell into the situation. I feel that those two picks should be kept independent of each other because I'm sure if they didn't draft Rodgers in 05, they may have drafted Leinart in 06.
                    I understand where you're coming from there (though Thompson passing on A.J. Hawk?), but the person I was addressing said he'd rather have Quinn, which is why I went there. Like I said, I feel it would be perfectly reasonable to throw in another player that the Packers would've considered at 24 in 2005 into this mix, but that's why I was doing the Quinn comparison.


                    The problem arises when people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support instead of illumination.

                    If luck is where preparation meets opportunity, then clutch is where failure meets luck.

                    <Add1ct> setting myself on fire can't be that hard
                    <Add1ct> but tackling a mosquito might prove a challenge

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Build a time machine go into the future, clone Johnny Unitas, and then when he's at his peak bring him back from the future to start for your team.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by TheGreatEscape View Post
                        Build a time machine go into the future, clone Johnny Unitas, and then when he's at his peak bring him back from the future to start for your team.
                        That's what the red sox have been trying to do with Ted Williams for years.


                        Originally posted by Halsey
                        I don't have to watch it to know it was not interesting.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          depends on, who the back up is, what the draft class looks like, where I was picking, and what the free agent/trade market looked like.

                          If I am the Packers I give Rogers a chance, but I might grab a QB on day two of the draft and/or sign Culpepper or another vet for insurance. I don't know what they have behind Rogers.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            If you trust your backup, go with him and bring in a good free agent to back him up.

                            If you DON'T trust your backup, go to the draft and still get a good free agent, and let them battle in camp.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Turtlepower View Post
                              That's what the red sox have been trying to do with Ted Williams for years.
                              But the red sox are evil and the forces of evil can not break through the space time continuum.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information