Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prisco's DL rankings

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    23 at bucs !!, and he put hovan as our best lineman lol

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by stephenson86 View Post
      isnt it in alphabetical order? i see what he did now

      he should ahve just put them in chronological order
      Yeah, it's organized terribly. I was trying to figure out what "rating" meant for a little while. I saw the Rams at 19 and thought, "Wow that's a pretty high rank for us." Then I realized "rating" actually means "rank" and I wasn't so happy about the 19, not that it's wrong though.

      I am done arguing, until somebody says something stupid.

      Comment


      • #18
        Im surprised we are as high as 27
        RIP Sean Michael Taylor

        Comment


        • #19
          He says Hali can be a 12 sack guy but then puts us down at 30? I knew there was a reason I hated Prisco. Of course, ratings like these are just like ratings on Madden. Young players likely to breakout or improve are still given low rankings so unless you are already an established player or group of players you will not get credit.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by kmartin575 View Post
            He says Hali can be a 12 sack guy but then puts us down at 30? I knew there was a reason I hated Prisco. Of course, ratings like these are just like ratings on Madden. Young players likely to breakout or improve are still given low rankings so unless you are already an established player or group of players you will not get credit.
            Yeah, why should players have to earn a high ranking!?

            Comment


            • #21
              - Gabe Watson was decent for the Cards last year. If he's their weak link...

              - Dallas enjoys the same problem, since Spears isn't terrible just nothing amazing.

              - So do the Packers.

              - The Pats weak link is Bruschi.

              Yea...thats it really.

              Comment


              • #22
                They should do a "front seven" ranking rather then a ranking of "defensive lines" and "linebackers", because the two things serve a totally different purpose in a 3-4 or 4-3.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by kmartin575 View Post
                  He says Hali can be a 12 sack guy but then puts us down at 30? I knew there was a reason I hated Prisco. Of course, ratings like these are just like ratings on Madden. Young players likely to breakout or improve are still given low rankings so unless you are already an established player or group of players you will not get credit.
                  Hali "can be" a 12-sack guy. When he "is" a 12-sack guy, the Chiefs' raking will improve.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I think the Steelers have a top 10 DL. As hard as it is to compare 3-4 to 4-3.

                    Keisel is underrated because the Steelers scheme him to be more of a passrusher.

                    Keisel had a top number of QB Hurries...
                    98-A.Odom, TEN: 1.69
                    91-R.Geathers, CIN: 1.56
                    51-J.Farrior, PIT: 1.50
                    93-K.Vanden Bosch, TEN: 1.44
                    92-B.Berry, ARI: 1.33
                    95-K.Wimbley, CLE: 1.25
                    69-J.Allen, KC: 1.25
                    94-K.Gbaja-Biamila, GB: 1.19
                    92-A.Haynesworth, TEN: 1.19
                    55-T.Suggs, BAL: 1.18
                    56-D.Burgess, OAK: 1.16
                    94-D.Ware, DAL: 1.16
                    56-A.Peek, CLE: 1.13
                    91-T.LaBoy, TEN: 1.13
                    99-B.Keisel, PIT: 1.10

                    Not one other 3-4 DL On that list (1.1 hurries per game)

                    Yeah, I play WoW too.[/CENTER]

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by stephenson86 View Post
                      isnt it in alphabetical order? i see what he did now

                      he should ahve just put them in chronological order
                      ... first assign a number of minutes to each player, then adding all the players ranked up to get a time valuation on a line and rank them accordingly?

                      Sig by Fenikz

                      I remember NFLDC
                      don't tell anyone, but Charlie Casserly is a dope fiend

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I think the Titans D-line should be ranked higher. Haynesworth and Vanden Bosch alone made their D-line great and it could be even better this year. I also think the Colts, pending that the majority of their D-line is healthy, could be ranked higher as well.
                        INDIANAPOLIS COLTS - A CHANGE IS COMING!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X

                        Debug Information