If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I agree to a point. I think it works for Philly, since they have a good team and if the Peters isn't so great, they may be able to withstand it. But there was no way a team like Detroit or St. Louis should have jumped on this deal.
Jason Peters gave up 11.5 sacks in 13 games (as stated before). 3rd worst in the NFL, barely better than Jeff Backus.
Hahaha that guy sucks! Who the hell does he play fo-- it's still the lions isn't it? :( damn. We suck so bad it's not even funny anymore.
THE LIONS ARE BECOMMING BOAT TRIP.
Sig by Fenikz
I remember NFLDC don't tell anyone, but Charlie Casserly is a dope fiend
This trade is still a win for the Eagles even with that contract, but the contract they gave him devalues the level of win in my opinion. The contract is good in a sense that Peters will still be making the same amount that he would in Buffalo over the next 2 years (if I read it correctly) and then the amount skyrockets in years 3-6. So he'll still have to prove he is worth the contract beyond the first two years and the guaranteed amount of the salary.
I also like Cole, and think He will win the C spot. As it is now with Jackson, our OL averages 334 lbs. Cole would only increase that, albeit slightly. Cole also brings better athletecism and quickness.