Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aaron Rodgers / Picks Vs Randy Moss / Courtney Anderson

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I'd love this trade, it would bring Russell to Cleveland and fix us. :)

    Comment


    • #17
      alex smith
      Last edited by #1chiefs_fan; 03-15-2007, 12:46 PM.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by #1chiefs_fan View Post
        I think the raiders are making a terrible mistake if they get a-rod. Any packer fan knows hes not a starting qb in this league. Just go back and look at what hes done in his short playing time. Granted its not much to judge from but god did he look terrible. Its a proven fact that "tedford system qb's" dont make it in the nfl. What makes a-rod any different? As a packer fan I would love to see the deal done. Why? because we all know a-rod is not the longterm answer for the pack. Yes we wasted a first round pick on him but sometimes you have to take a loss and move on.
        alex smith was a system qb at utah and look what he did for the 9ers last year.

        Comment


        • #19
          i hope the packers get rid of rodgers, and then he whoops their ass on another team.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by jag View Post
            Any Packer fan would know this.

            Aaron Rodgers has never started a game. So I'm not quite sure were you get "terribe" from.
            He had his ups and downs, I certainly wouldn't say everything he did has been terrible. The fact of the matter is that he's hardly had a chance to do anything, so it's too early for anybody to be sure about anything.

            http://www.packersnews.com/apps/pbcs.../70315079/1989

            Harlan: Trade for Moss isn't close to happening
            By Rob Demovsky
            rdemovsk@greenbaypressgazette.com


            Bob Harlan, the Green Bay Packers’ chairman and CEO, said this morning it seemed unlikely that a trade to acquire receiver Randy Moss from Oakland was imminent.

            Reached in his office, Harlan said he had not heard a Boston Herald report that quoted “a Wisconsin source” as saying the Packers and Raiders are on the verge of announcing a trade that would send Moss to the Packers for backup quarterback Aaron Rodgers.

            Harlan said he has not spoken with General Manager Ted Thompson since he left for a scouting trip on Tuesday afternoon.

            “If (a trade) was that close, (Thompson) would have called us by now,” Harlan said.

            Thompson presented his monthly report to the Packers’ board of directors during its regular meeting on Tuesday morning and then left town. He is not scheduled to return until Friday night.

            The subject of Moss came up during Tuesday’s meeting, but Thompson didn’t indicate a deal was about to be made.

            “No, not at all,” Harlan said. “And he would have told that group if it was that close.”

            Thompson was not immediately available for comment.

            The trade, according to the Herald’s source, would send Rodgers and a seventh-round draft pick in 2008 to the Raiders for Moss, tight end Courtney Anderson and a conditional 2009 draft pick that would depend on how well Rodgers played for the Raiders in 2007 and 2008.
            Originally posted by njx9
            i invite all of you to spam the board with moronic topics that aren't even vaguely entertaining. please.

            Comment


            • #21
              The fact that they continually talk about it publically all but assures that it will happen eventually barring any snags.


              Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by #1chiefs_fan View Post
                alex smith was a system qb at utah and look what he did for the 9ers last year.
                He had an average season at best and now his qb coach is gone. Not to mention hes not a product of the tedford system.

                Trent Dilfer
                David Carr
                Joey Harrington
                Kyle Boller
                Akili Smith

                I thinks that pretty much sums it up!

                THE PACK IS BACK!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Outgoing Packers CEO Bob Harlan, who has been more talkative than ever over the past few days, tells the Green Bay Press-Gazette that a deal for Raiders receiver Randy Moss is not close to happening.

                  Harlan bases his assessment on the fact that G.M. Ted Thompson left on Tuesday for a scouting trip, and has not phoned in to tell Harlan that a deal was close.

                  “If [a trade] was that close, [Thompson] would have called us by now,” Harlan said.

                  Of course, given that Harlan has been flapping his lips about the Moss situation for most of the past week, maybe the close-vested Thompson realized that giving Harlan a head's up was the equivalent of shouting the news from the middle of Times Square with a megaphone.

                  And the fact that Harlan didn't say something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about" or "We have no interest in Randy Moss" or "Randy Moss will be doing the Lambeau Leap over my dead body" tells us that something is going on -- and that at this point it's more likely a matter not of "if" but "when."

                  THE PACK IS BACK!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bearsfan_51 View Post
                    It makes sense for both sides.

                    I must say though, as it pertains to Ted Thompson, I would be shocked that he would ship out "his guy" and risk the long term stability of the franchise for a one, maybe two year shot at making some noise in the playoffs. They either really are not sold on Rogers (which is odd since they drafted him) or they are really feeling the pressure to do something for Lord Favre in his last season or two.

                    Either way, I wouldn't love shipping off your QB of the future, but it does make them a better team in the short run at a time when the Bears could potentially be vulnerable.

                    Only someone with Grossman would consider Rodgers 'a QB of the future'. I'll be watching for when you remove my post from your signature. That's gonna happen. With or without Moss.

                    Got some news for you. Rodgers isn't the 1st backup QB shipped out for picks/players.

                    Brunell - was better than Rodgers
                    Hasslebeck - is better than Rodgers ever could imagine to be.
                    Brooks
                    Nall

                    When you can ship out a mediocre QB for something and replace him in the draft, it's a good idea. Now I can understand why the Bears fans wouldn't understand becasue they've had about 50 different sucky QB's since Favre took snap #1 in Green Bay.

                    Agree totally on your last line. You are starting to see the cracks in that fragile Bears team. At the same time the Pack grows stronger. I called it and you posted it in your signature. Classic.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I hate to say it but I told you so :)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        You're a dumbass. Nothing you said was either relavent to my post or informed in any manner.

                        They shipped those QB's out because Favre was still playing at a high level and had his career ahead of him. Favre is an average QB at best anymore, and has this year and maybe one more and that's it.

                        They drafted him with their 1st round pick, that would indicate that they at some point considered him to be their QB of the future. If they trade him, they're going to have to draft another one in the high rounds and hope to groom him extrememly fast because when Favre leaves you're going to have nooooooobody.

                        Nothing I said was a shot at the Packers at all. ******* grow up. Obviously you're having some issues with the fact that the Bears are so far ahead of the Packers right now. Otherwise you wouldn't make such outlandish and uncalled for comments. I said the Bears could be vulnerable. They are still leaps and bounds above the Packers right now. And any objective person could recognize that.


                        Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by lod01 View Post
                          Only someone with Grossman would consider Rodgers 'a QB of the future'. I'll be watching for when you remove my post from your signature. That's gonna happen. With or without Moss.

                          Got some news for you. Rodgers isn't the 1st backup QB shipped out for picks/players.

                          Brunell - was better than Rodgers
                          Hasslebeck - is better than Rodgers ever could imagine to be.
                          Brooks
                          Nall

                          When you can ship out a mediocre QB for something and replace him in the draft, it's a good idea. Now I can understand why the Bears fans wouldn't understand becasue they've had about 50 different sucky QB's since Favre took snap #1 in Green Bay.

                          Agree totally on your last line. You are starting to see the cracks in that fragile Bears team. At the same time the Pack grows stronger. I called it and you posted it in your signature. Classic.
                          Good Point!

                          THE PACK IS BACK!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by bearsfan_51 View Post
                            You're a dumbass. Nothing you said was either relavent to my post or informed in any manner.

                            They shipped those QB's out because Favre was still playing at a high level and had his career ahead of him. Favre is an average QB at best anymore, and has this year and maybe one more and that's it.

                            They drafted him with their 1st round pick, that would indicate that they at some point considered him to be their QB of the future. If they trade him, they're going to have to draft another one in the high rounds and hope to groom him extrememly fast because when Favre leaves you're going to have nooooooobody.

                            Nothing I said was a shot at the Packers at all. ******* grow up. Obviously you're having some issues with the fact that the Bears are so far ahead of the Packers right now. Otherwise you wouldn't make such outlandish and uncalled for comments. I said the Bears could be vulnerable. They are still leaps and bounds above the Packers right now. And any objective person could recognize that.
                            Actually they drafted himbecause he was the best value on the board and thats how ted drafts. I dont think anyone in the organization thought he was the qb of the future.

                            THE PACK IS BACK!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              i love this trade because I HATE Aaron Rodgers. i'm just really happy he isn't the Packer's "QB of the Future" anymore.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Meta4 View Post
                                Actually they drafted himbecause he was the best value on the board and thats how ted drafts. I dont think anyone in the organization thought he was the qb of the future.
                                What value does he have if they never planned on him playing. Do you realize what little sense that makes? Best player available is only relavent if you actually plan on playing that guy.

                                I also love how so many Packers fans were saying that he was the QB of the future, but now that there is talk of him being traded everyone throws him under the bus. What a bunch of baseless homers you are.

                                I realize that some (drowe for example) never liked Rogers, but that was the minority. Most felt that "they would be fine" and "Rogers will carry the program after Favre leaves".


                                Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information