Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bills Trade Lynch to Seahawks

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by SuperMcgee View Post
    The guy that works behind a ****** line is Jackson, who has enough strength, sense, and elusiveness to make something out of nothing and pick up consistent yards. He's outperformed Lynch for 3 years.
    LYNCH:
    2007, 13 games, 1,115 yards, 7 TDs, 4.0 avg
    2008, 15 games, 1,036 yards, 8 TDs, 4.1 avg
    2009, 13 games, 120 carries, 450 yards, 2 TDs, 3.8 avg
    2010, 4 games, 37 carries, 164 yards, 0 TDs, 4.4 avg

    FRED JACKSON
    2007, 8 games, 300 yards, 0 TDs, 5.2 avg
    2008, 16 games, 571 yards, 3 TDs, 4.4 avg
    2009, 16 games, 237 carries, 1,062 yards, 2 TDs, 4.5 avg
    2010, 4 games, 32 carries, 160 yards, 1 TDs, 5.0 avg

    It hasn't been as dramatic as Michael Turner looked compared to Tomlinson the last 2 years together in San Diego IMO, but Jackson has outperformed Lynch, as the stats indicate, and most Bills fans would say.

    Maybe that's why Ted Thompson wasn't so eager to bring in Lynch.
    DeAngelo>Marshawn!

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by J-Mike88 View Post
      LYNCH:
      2007, 13 games, 1,115 yards, 7 TDs, 4.0 avg
      2008, 15 games, 1,036 yards, 8 TDs, 4.1 avg
      2009, 13 games, 120 carries, 450 yards, 2 TDs, 3.8 avg
      2010, 4 games, 37 carries, 164 yards, 0 TDs, 4.4 avg

      FRED JACKSON
      2007, 8 games, 300 yards, 0 TDs, 5.2 avg
      2008, 16 games, 571 yards, 3 TDs, 4.4 avg
      2009, 16 games, 237 carries, 1,062 yards, 2 TDs, 4.5 avg
      2010, 4 games, 32 carries, 160 yards, 1 TDs, 5.0 avg

      It hasn't been as dramatic as Michael Turner looked compared to Tomlinson the last 2 years together in San Diego IMO, but Jackson has outperformed Lynch, as the stats indicate, and most Bills fans would say.

      Maybe that's why Ted Thompson wasn't so eager to bring in Lynch.
      DeAngelo>Marshawn!
      Williams may be a better RB but no way Thompson will trade for him and no he did not decide not to trade for Marshawn because he thought Jackson was better its because he loves drafting more then trading he never would trade for that one piece like some other teams would to complete the team if it ment giving up a high draft pick.

      Also Jackson is 29 you think hes going to outlast Lynch whos 24? I don't think so Lynch has 6 years left before he hits the dreaded 30. Also Jackson had 117 more carries then Lynch when he had 1k yards so he was taking carries away of course Lynch numbers are going to be down.
      Last edited by sacks98; 10-16-2010, 12:34 AM.
      Earl Thomas:23 Tackles|0.0 Sacks|0 FF|3 INT

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by sacks98 View Post
        Williams may be a better RB but no way Thompson will trade for him and no he did not decide not to trade for Marshawn because he thought Jackson was better its because he loves drafting more then trading he never would trade for that one piece like some other teams would to complete the team if it ment giving up a high draft pick.
        That's a run-on sentence.

        Thompson did try and trade for Marshawn, he just wouldn't beat the Seahawks offer. He took a small swing though, as he did for Tony Gonzalez in 2008, and maybe Randy Moss in 2007, and 2008.
        That was pretty aggressive considering it's Ted Thompson.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by J-Mike88 View Post
          That's a run-on sentence.

          Thompson did try and trade for Marshawn, he just wouldn't beat the Seahawks offer. He took a small swing though, as he did for Tony Gonzalez in 2008, and maybe Randy Moss in 2007, and 2008.
          That was pretty aggressive considering it's Ted Thompson.
          Let me guess he wouldn't try to beat anyone elses offer?? Just proofing my point he doesn't like to trade picks away can't blame him. But Lynch wouldve been a nice addition although Packers line is about as terrible as the Seahawks,Bills line is so maybe he made the right choice.
          Earl Thomas:23 Tackles|0.0 Sacks|0 FF|3 INT

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by sacks98 View Post
            Also Jackson is 29 you think hes going to outlast Lynch whos 24? I don't think so Lynch has 6 years left before he hits the dreaded 30. Also Jackson had 117 more carries then Lynch when he had 1k yards so he was taking carries away of course Lynch numbers are going to be down.
            First of all, Lynch wouldn't even be here in two years, regardless. I'm hoping I don't have to worry about the longevity of either that much since we just used a top-10 pick on a running back, but I think Jackson has plenty left.

            I really have no idea what you're trying to say in the second part of that. Lynch's numbers were down because he was the inferior running back and therefore got less carries?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by J-Mike88 View Post
              LYNCH:
              2007, 13 games, 1,115 yards, 7 TDs, 4.0 avg
              2008, 15 games, 1,036 yards, 8 TDs, 4.1 avg
              2009, 13 games, 120 carries, 450 yards, 2 TDs, 3.8 avg
              2010, 4 games, 37 carries, 164 yards, 0 TDs, 4.4 avg

              FRED JACKSON
              2007, 8 games, 300 yards, 0 TDs, 5.2 avg
              2008, 16 games, 571 yards, 3 TDs, 4.4 avg
              2009, 16 games, 237 carries, 1,062 yards, 2 TDs, 4.5 avg
              2010, 4 games, 32 carries, 160 yards, 1 TDs, 5.0 avg

              It hasn't been as dramatic as Michael Turner looked compared to Tomlinson the last 2 years together in San Diego IMO, but Jackson has outperformed Lynch, as the stats indicate, and most Bills fans would say.

              Maybe that's why Ted Thompson wasn't so eager to bring in Lynch.
              DeAngelo>Marshawn!
              The only year he out performed him was 2009 when Lynch had an injury and missed some games I believe.


              Originally posted by WMD
              Jesse realizing Walt was Santa Claus could really shake things up.
              Originally posted by gpngc
              I don't know how old you are, but if you can get to 24/25 without getting arrested or killed, you've done well for yourself lol.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Jvig43 View Post
                The only year he out performed him was 2009 when Lynch had an injury and missed some games I believe.
                2009 was when Lynch was suspended for 3 games, but lost his job as the starter.

                But anyway, I watch every Bills game. He may not have put up more yards in the first couple of years (probably because it's a lot easier to get carries as a first round pick than as an undrafted guy signed out of the midwest arena leagues when busting into the NFL), but he has been the better player for that amount of time. His worst YPC for a season is better than Lynch's best, and he only gets better with a bigger workload.

                Comment


                • #83
                  I read a ridiculous stat that after he gets 20 carries, Fred Jacksons YPC jumps to like 7.2 or something. Cant remember where I read it, but if its true its absolutely insane.
                  Originally posted by Mr. Goosemahn
                  The APS is strong in this one.
                  Originally posted by killxswitch
                  Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by SuperMcgee View Post
                    2009 was when Lynch was suspended for 3 games, but lost his job as the starter.

                    But anyway, I watch every Bills game. He may not have put up more yards in the first couple of years (probably because it's a lot easier to get carries as a first round pick than as an undrafted guy signed out of the midwest arena leagues when busting into the NFL), but he has been the better player for that amount of time. His worst YPC for a season is better than Lynch's best, and he only gets better with a bigger workload.
                    What he said. Jackson's running style just makes everyone cum their pants because he never ever dances at all behind the line and just guns it through holes for solid gains. Its much nicer than watching Lynch jump around from side to side in the back field for four minutes every play and then kind of fall forward for half a yard or two with five defenders on him.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X

                    Debug Information