Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mike Bell

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by America
    The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.

    This is harder than I thought..

    For whom the Bell Tolls..?

    Hells Bells?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by jsagan77
      Originally posted by America
      The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.

      This is harder than I thought..

      For whom the Bell Tolls..?

      Hells Bells?
      let's call them Steve.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by jsagan77
        Originally posted by America
        The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.

        This is harder than I thought..

        For whom the Bell Tolls..?

        Hells Bells?
        I thought of that a few days ago, but thought it was too lame.

        That is correct comahan
        I ******* LOVE YOU DG
        <3 dg

        Comment


        • #34
          The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.
          Taco Bell?

          I dont know, its sounds good now because I'm hungry

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by draftguru151
            Originally posted by jsagan77
            Originally posted by America
            The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.

            This is harder than I thought..

            For whom the Bell Tolls..?

            Hells Bells?
            I thought of that a few days ago, but thought it was too lame.
            I always used to say that when Mike Bell was at Arizona

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by jsagan77
              Originally posted by America
              The Bells need some sort of nickname in Denver's backfield.

              This is harder than I thought..

              For whom the Bell Tolls..?

              Hells Bells?
              lmao, this has been heavily discussed already in the ORangemane (Broncos forum). So far the leading candidate seems to be Ding Dong (Tatum will ding u for a long run, Mike will dong u and move the chains).

              Projected win total: 55+

              Comment


              • #37
                Mike Bell was a solid back in college playing for a bad team. He has much better blocking now, receivers that are WAY better than what he had, and a better QB.

                Yeah, the defenses he'll face are a lot better, but he was very consistent and played hard every down, whether his team was winning or losing getting spenked by USC.

                Mike Bell will have a solid career for the Broncos.
                The pain fades and the good memories will remain.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Denver Bronco56
                  Originally posted by Geo
                  Originally posted by Stats
                  Well, if anyone has actually seen him play this preseason, it's obvious he's the best downhill runner on the Broncos. He sees the hole and hits it better than any back on the team. He runs with power and has the ability to break the big play. He can run between the tackles or outside. And he does a good job in short yardage and goal line(2 TDs on the goal line last nite).
                  Unfortunately for the Ponies, they can't just play the Lions and the Titans.
                  but we always get ours..i mean we have been #1 on rushing form HB the last 4 years...(the falcons only beat us due to vick)

                  Speaking of "the falcons only beat us due to vick," I am sure you remember that game.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by johbur
                    Mike Bell was a solid back in college playing for a bad team. He has much better blocking now, receivers that are WAY better than what he had, and a better QB.

                    Yeah, the defenses he'll face are a lot better, but he was very consistent and played hard every down, whether his team was winning or losing getting spenked by USC.

                    Mike Bell will have a solid career for the Broncos.

                    It's hard to say any Denver back will have a solid career for the Broncos. That particular position has a rediculous high turnover, for them. They change things up every year.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Shiver
                      Originally posted by johbur
                      Mike Bell was a solid back in college playing for a bad team. He has much better blocking now, receivers that are WAY better than what he had, and a better QB.

                      Yeah, the defenses he'll face are a lot better, but he was very consistent and played hard every down, whether his team was winning or losing getting spenked by USC.

                      Mike Bell will have a solid career for the Broncos.

                      It's hard to say any Denver back will have a solid career for the Broncos. That particular position has a rediculous high turnover, for them. They change things up every year.
                      we do seem to get a rather high number of injuries at the position... we also seem to run guys into the ground.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        It's almost a shame that so many 'Backs can rush for 1,000 yards in the offense. It's tarnished Terrell Davis' accomplishments, I think.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          absolutely. it's annoying to see so many people write the guy off as a product of the system.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by njx9
                            absolutely. it's annoying to see so many people write the guy off as a product of the system.
                            Anyone that says that probably knows more about boy bands than football.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I actually think he is gonna me much like Mike Anderson was...except he is gonna be around a bit longer.

                              If he stays the starter for the entire season this year, I think he has a great season.

                              290 carries
                              1285 yards
                              11 TDs

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Stats
                                Originally posted by njx9
                                absolutely. it's annoying to see so many people write the guy off as a product of the system.
                                Anyone that says that probably knows more about boy bands than football.
                                (shhhh, the hanson fans will hear you)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information