Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prooving a point

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Like I said before, when I voted, I considered money because it didn't mention it not being an issue in the first post. Of course I would take Holt on my team if money wasn't an issue, every single team in the league would.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by cardsalltheway
      Like I said before, when I voted, I considered money because it didn't mention it not being an issue in the first post. Of course I would take Holt on my team if money wasn't an issue, every single team in the league would.
      That's the point of the friggin argument, to make HawkeyeFan look like a complete tool. Money was not an issue when yoda made this thread, it was made to make HF look like a friggin dumbass, which it did.

      It's a simple yes/no question. Would you take Torry Holt on your team?


      Another sig courtesy of BoneKrusher

      Originally posted by JBCX
      Despite looking better against an underachieving Eagles team, I still think the Bears are one of the worst teams in the NFL. I smell a blowout victory by the Lions this week and a division sweep.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by sweetness34
        It's a simple yes/no question. Would you take Torry Holt on your team?
        Indeed, there's no reason to overthink it.

        Comment


        • #64
          Uhh, yes. Next question.

          Comment


          • #65
            The 49ers could use him


            Comment


            • #66
              Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by NGSeiler
                Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                Who?

                Hitman D

                "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation." - Henry David Thoreau

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Boston
                  Originally posted by NGSeiler
                  Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                  Who?


                  Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by NGSeiler
                    Originally posted by Boston
                    Originally posted by NGSeiler
                    Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                    Who?


                    Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D
                    That's Torry Holt. :roll:

                    Hitman D

                    "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation." - Henry David Thoreau

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by NGSeiler
                      Originally posted by Boston
                      Originally posted by NGSeiler
                      Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                      Who?


                      Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D
                      Good one.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by cardsalltheway
                        Good one.
                        Are you suggesting a receiver who is 7th all time in receptions, 7th all time in receiving yards, 18th all time in receiving touchdowns, and 22nd all time in total yards from scrimmage is not deserving of HOF consideration?

                        Interesting.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by NGSeiler
                          Originally posted by Boston
                          Originally posted by NGSeiler
                          Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                          Who?


                          Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D
                          Why are there two accented vowels?

                          by BoneKrusher
                          <DG> how metal unseen
                          <TheUnseen> Drunken Canadian Bastard: There's an APS for that

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by The Unseen
                            Originally posted by NGSeiler
                            Originally posted by Boston
                            Originally posted by NGSeiler
                            Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                            Who?


                            Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D
                            Why are there two accented vowels?
                            Because that's how I've always spelled résumé?

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by NGSeiler
                              Originally posted by The Unseen
                              Originally posted by NGSeiler
                              Originally posted by Boston
                              Originally posted by NGSeiler
                              Y'know, that Isaac Bruce isn't half bad either... 8)
                              Who?


                              Another 1,000 yard season to add to that Hall of Fame résumé. :D
                              Why are there two accented vowels?
                              Because that's how I've always spelled résumé?
                              ... because Resume is from French Dialect i believe. If not it would be "resume", to start something you paused from.

                              with the accents its a list of your acheivements and work experience.

                              Yeah, I play WoW too.[/CENTER]

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by NGSeiler
                                Originally posted by cardsalltheway
                                Good one.
                                Are you suggesting a receiver who is 7th all time in receptions, 7th all time in receiving yards, 18th all time in receiving touchdowns, and 22nd all time in total yards from scrimmage is not deserving of HOF consideration?

                                Interesting.
                                given that art monk's stats aren't really all that far off, is it really that interesting?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information