Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arizona Cardinals Discussion Thread

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    i think we can get someone to throw in a 6th or so too

    Comment


    • #62
      SO what are the Cards needs still i think its
      Its not in any rank

      RB-power back
      WR- Slot Speed guy, Fitz and Boldin are good, but they are more like Possesion
      DE-Obivious Need
      OT-Same thing
      C-some depth
      DB-with the siging of Holt and Hood i still think a speed guy is need at either position for return abilities and depth
      LB-depth if we decide to move Pace back to DE and neither Huff or Blackstock work out

      Comment


      • #63
        Needs in order

        LT
        WLB
        DE
        S
        CB

        imo

        Comment


        • #64
          Skins signed David Macklin to a 1 year 700,000 deal, I obviously don't expect him to be more than solid depth 4 or 5 on the depth chart, but what can u tell me about him?

          Sig By:The Dynasty

          2 7 Round Mocks: April 20
          http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/...50#post2577350
          Full NBA Mock Draft: Updated May 18
          http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/...=1#post2602966

          Comment


          • #65
            Hey Cardinal nation, you guys have had it worse than us over in Cleveland through the years so I feel for ya.

            Anyways, if the top 4 goes like this (which seems highly likely as of late), who do you guys think goes to Arizona?:

            1-Oakland-Calvin Johnson-WR
            2-Detroit-Joe Thomas-LT
            3-Cleveland-JaMarcus Russell-QB
            4-Tampa Bay-Gaines Adams-RDE

            The top players on the board would be Peterson, Quinn, Landry, L.Brown, Okoye, and Anderson. Thoughts?

            Comment


            • #66
              Either we move down and get L.Brown, take Landry which i doubt will happen but you never know, most logical pick i think would be Anderson who i want over Adams, since adams can only pass rush. Okoye would be a good pick but DT is not a need unless we are planning on using him as a old school type DE which would be nice.

              Comment


              • #67
                Well my whole question is hypothetical since Russell is just as likely to go #1 as Johnson (some people say much more likely). Just wondering how the heck the top ten would change if Johnson did get picked first.

                Comment


                • #68
                  id take AD he is the BPA and edge isnt very young

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by fenikz View Post
                    id take AD he is the BPA and edge isnt very young
                    Yeah, but you have Edge signed for 3 more years I think for a lot of money. Edge wouldn't be happy with a split-back system because you know he wants to be the premiere back. So, I'm guessing if we draft Peterson, he will sit on the bench until Edge starts sucking or we trade/release him.

                    BoneKrusher

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      AD would be splitting carries with edge from day 1, with Wisenhunt's plan of running the ball 60% of the time we are gonna need 2 quality backs, Shipp is a short yardage/ Goaline back & Arrington is a waste and should be cut, so thus AD is a need

                      and ive never heard edge say that he wants all the carries

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by fenikz View Post
                        AD would be splitting carries with edge from day 1, with Wisenhunt's plan of running the ball 60% of the time we are gonna need 2 quality backs, Shipp is a short yardage/ Goaline back & Arrington is a waste and should be cut, so thus AD is a need

                        and ive never heard edge say that he wants all the carries
                        So you think Edge would be happy only getting 10-15 carries a game compared to 25-30? And we'd be paying him $7 million a year for that.

                        BoneKrusher

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          it would be

                          Edge 20-25
                          AD 15-20

                          but that could change depending on how well each one is doing on a certain day\


                          even if we didn't grab AD i expect Shipp to be getting more carries like 10-15 a game

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by fenikz View Post
                            it would be

                            Edge 20-25
                            AD 15-20

                            but that could change depending on how well each one is doing on a certain day\


                            even if we didn't grab AD i expect Shipp to be getting more carries like 10-15 a game
                            I would want Arrington running the ball before Shipp. I think either one would get 10 carries a game at the most. I want Edge to be our premiere back, and we have 2 quality RB's backing him up. I don't see the need for Peterson right now. If Edge only had a year left on his contract, then I wouldn't mind drafting him. However, I just don't see the need for drafting a RB when we have no need for one.

                            BoneKrusher

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Why not wait and draft someone in the 4th round like a Chris Henry...great measureables and not a power back that has a lot of mileage on his tires from a ton of carries in College. Learning from a future HOFer, as long as he can regain his formerself from Indy, like Edge he could turn out to be a very talented and explosive #2 back and future replacement for him if Edge doesnt improve with an improved OL or when his contract is over..

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                because Henry did nothing at UofA and i expect he will do nothing in the pros, just a work out warrior

                                the only reason I want AD is that prospects like him don't come along very often, and even when they do how often are we gonna be in position to grab one
                                Last edited by fenikz; 04-10-2007, 04:04 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information