I don't have any issue in what you're saying about being an attacking defense. I have an issue with you saying that Wade's scheme is a vanilla scheme. Is that what you're saying? What exactly do you mean by calling it vanilla? That they don't blitz enough? Or is it something else? That word is too indescriptive for me. Are you calling Wade's gameplan & play calling too conservative or are you calling the scheme itself in design inadequate?
I'll go from there.