Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Denver Broncos Discussion

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Jimmy View Post
    Dareus is an *absolute stud*, if I may for a moment steal the asterisks for purposes of emphasis. After watching this game, it'd be hard for me to defend us not taking him, regardless of value. Maybe we trade down a few spots. Anyone who puts Fairley ahead of him after this game (barring a Suh like performance from Fairley in the National Championship Game) is out of their mind. Dareus played the entire game on a 3 man front at end, and absolutely dominated. I have no question this guy can play end in our system anymore. The only question that remains is related to character/motivation issues, and those are things that just might have to be ignored.

    At this point, this is what our draft board/priority sheet should look like.

    1. Marcel Dareus (trade down a few spots?)
    -or-
    2. Patrick Peterson (terrific value & the sexier pick, but we all know we just need to go DL, DL, Dl, MLB this year.
    I don't know how getting Dareus would work.
    Some scouts have him in the second at this point.
    Also..how were Hightower/Jones?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DBNYDP View Post
      I don't know how getting Dareus would work.
      Some scouts have him in the second at this point.
      Also..how were Hightower/Jones?
      Julio was amazing, although his stats didn't show it. All 3 of his catches came on 1 drive I believe, had a 30 yard td run. Really as dominant as you can get when your team is running the ball over and over in a 49-7 whipping. As dominant as you can get physically for a WR.

      Hightower got overshadowed by Dareus, Upshaw and Nico Johnson.

      As for scouts having Dareus in the 2nd, I believe you, but I'm just curious... who in their right mind would have that guy anywhere out of their top 15? You could easily justify reaching for him at #2-5 at this point.
      Last edited by Jimmy; 01-01-2011, 04:43 PM.

      Comment


      • I agree, I've been saying for over a year now that Dareus is easily the most impressive player on that defense and should be a top pick.
        Virginia Tech.
        ACC Champions 2004, 2007, 2008, 2010

        Next Up: 2012

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BamaFalcon59 View Post
          I agree, I've been saying for over a year now that Dareus is easily the most impressive player on that defense and should be a top pick.
          Rightly so, nobody really likes him right now because he didn't give a flying **** this season. He played his cards right and gave it his all his last game. In two weeks or so, (or whenever Kiper/McShay/Scott release their updated mocks) I guarantee you that the general consensus on this board will be that Dareus is a top 10 lock again, and I'd bet on 2:1 odds that he's a top 5 pick come April if he stays in shape and doesn't roll up to the Indy combine in a stolen Hummer.

          edit: all of this, of course, assuming he declares
          Last edited by Jimmy; 01-01-2011, 05:29 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by njx9
            which is exactly why i don't want him anywhere near denver. let him go infect some other locker room.
            In any event, I have no proof one way or the other that he was a lazy ****, I'm just going on what I've read. That's why I'd love to get a chance to interview the kid and really see what he's like. There's always a chance he's been so "bleh" simply because he's been injured, although that's just speculation as well. That's where the combine and personal interviews will come in handy.

            Comment


            • I meant Greg Jones :D

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DBNYDP View Post
                I meant Greg Jones :D
                Greg Jones was okay, certainly not all over the place like I expected early on, but he was flying around giving it his all despite MSU being down by 40. Not particularly amazing at getting into the backfield and stopping the ballcarried, but good enough.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jimmy View Post
                  Anyone who puts Fairley ahead of him after this game (barring a Suh like performance from Fairley in the National Championship Game) is out of their mind.
                  You serious? Fairley was dominant all season. So Dareus finally showed up this year.. Count me as not impressed. I still think he will be a top-10 pick, but I don't get how this one game against an overrated Michigan State team makes him the best DL in the draft.

                  WELCOME REALITY

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jCut View Post
                    You serious? Fairley was dominant all season. So Dareus finally showed up this year.. Count me as not impressed. I still think he will be a top-10 pick, but I don't get how this one game against an overrated Michigan State team makes him the best DL in the draft.
                    To be honest (but not to make excuses) my guess would be that he got double teamed a lot more this year just because of his play last year. At his best (whether that means he was finally healthy, or whether it means he actually tried) he's a more talented prospect than Fairley, and in my humble opinion, that is completely undeniable. He's a game changer, and unlike Fairley, he's been playing at this high of a level since high school as well, which leads me to believe he isn't just a one year wonder.

                    It wasn't just the one game against an overrated Michigan State team, it was the fact that he literally tore through double teams like newspaper. It's the fact that he's done it multiple times earlier in his collegiate career. If Fairley had one more year of quality play, I'd definitely have a different opinion of him. It's a very neutral opinion I have at this point in time. Dareus has the higher ceiling, is bigger, and is more explosive. I really do think he will be one of the best 3-4 DE's in the league if he wants to be.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jimmy View Post
                      I really don't envision switching to a 4-3 being a problem for Doom. He posted something like (edit) 17 sacks as a senior at UL in a 4-3, and really showed promise in his rookie or second season and posted 10 sacks.
                      He's a good pass rusher from a 4-man front. However, he's terrible at holding the point of attack as a DE in a traditional 4-3 scheme.

                      The 3-4 is a better fit overall for him, IMO.

                      Comment


                      • Mularkey to be interviewed.

                        Orton up for grabs for a second round pick.

                        Lots of change coming.

                        Comment


                        • Broncos are set to interview two head coaching candidates, Greg Williams and Perry Fewell, that use the 43 system. A telling sign of things to come?

                          WELCOME REALITY

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by njx9
                            what's sad is that i'm not actually sure that our defense is in any worse shape than it was when shanahan got canned. as much as i hate mcdaniels, i think shanny did far more damage to this team.
                            Shanahan destroyed the defense. No question about that. Terrible drafting, DC-as-scapegoat, constant scheme changes.... ugh.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jCut View Post
                              Broncos are set to interview two head coaching candidates, Greg Williams and Perry Fewell, that use the 43 system. A telling sign of things to come?
                              The 4-3 is a better fit for our talent overall. 3-4 is better for Doom.

                              That being said, Williams and Fewell both know how to use pass rushers and bring pressure. I'm confident they'd both be able to find ways to use Doom effectively in their schemes.

                              Of the HC candidates mentioned so far, I like Williams the best. I remember the Redskins playing some good D under him, and he's done well with the Saints despite injuries and some questionable parts.

                              Comment


                              • I still think Doom needs another chance as an every down guy in a 4-3 with some talent around him, and good DC scheming with his weakness in mind.

                                I would like to point out...that Robert Ayers is a really good prospect at 4-3 DE. And you know the Giants took JPP last year, if Fewell comes in he might take a guy like...Allen Bailey from Miami. The guy is an animal, and if he is developed there he can be special. Plus he might be available in the 3rd at this point..
                                Something like Ayers/Fairley/Nevis or Veteran/Doom or Bailey and we would have a great starting 4.

                                Williams defense didn't have the best pieces last year but he still got it done. Very aggressive, and capitalizes on how the other offense needs to match our defense to create turnovers. I'd be happy with him/Fewell. I'm low on Nolan because of the fallout of our defense, and I'm also really high on Rivera, who can do both schemes.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information