If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'd be comfortable with it.. I wouldn't prefer it, but say we decide that there are better players available at #20 and #33 than the best Cornerback available.. I'd rather have Henry and King starting than King and Fisher.
Basically, I wouldn't have much of a problem waiting a year to draft a Cornerback..
Ya, I really don't like the idea of a corner at 20. With how long QB's have to stand in the pocket and let routes develop, I don't think any CB is going to look that good. Beefing up our front 7 will help our pass d out as much as a CB upgrade would imo.
Yeah, I think we'd be smart to sign a big ass obese DT like Grady Jackson for a year or two.
That way, if we go with a Linebacker at #20, he can step in and have someone taking up blockers. DE's can get pressure on the QB, which helps out the CB's and LB's.. I think taking a Cornerback or Linebacker without getting a DT would be a little bit of a mistake.