Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New York Jets Discussion

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...l-head-to-nyc/

    How does everyone feel about the potential of L.T. becoming a Jet? Personally I would be pretty excited because it would be a great fit and I believe he has a year or two left in the tank as a 2nd option. I had LT in fantasy last year and watched many of his games. The two things I noticed were that he did seem to lose a step, but more importantly the Chargers O-line didn't produce any running room. LT losing a step is better than the majority of RB's in the league, and I think running behind our top O-line would prolong his career.

    Comment


    • Marlin Jackson signed with the Eagles.

      And I wouldn't mind LT at all. However, at this phase of his career, I think he's about on par with Thomas Jones. So really, if we can't sign him for less than whatever we offered Jones, I don't see why we should bring him in. But they probably don't see it that way with name value and everything. I'd really rather find a more affordable option though (unless he is affordable and he's not getting a lot of love so far because he's trying to find a contender, and most contenders are either set at RB or don't like him). I think Betts or Fargas would really be just as good for what we need them for. That's just me though.
      Ohio State Buckeyes Duke Blue Devils New York Jets St. Louis Cardinals San Jose Sharks Seattle Mariners

      Comment


      • found a green kellen clemens jersey at sports authority for 25.


        you can bet your ass i purchased it.
        Penn State University - Detroit Red Wings - New York Jets - Red Bull New York - Fulham FC

        Comment


        • Originally posted by TimDris View Post
          found a green kellen clemens jersey at sports authority for 25.


          you can bet your ass i purchased it.
          I saw a Leon on the clearance rack at Dicks but couldn't find a price and I'm low on money anyway so I didn't go for it. Time will tell if I regret the decision I guess.

          I also think TTGS's post on LDT was absolute money, lots of really good points and I like the Betts/Fargas call. Didn't know Betts was on the market, I've always liked him for whatever reason I'd be pretty happy if we picked him up.

          Comment


          • I think Betts or Fargas would really be just as good for what we need them for. That's just me though.[/QUOTE]

            i mentioned fargas a week or so back as a nice complement. betts is too injury prone,and is coming off acl and mcl tears so his career is in doubt.. so id rather stay clear of that.
            Last edited by jmess15; 03-11-2010, 08:06 PM. Reason: typo
            J. MESS

            Comment


            • what do you think the actual chance is that we sign L.T? Im a huuge fan of this but you never know.. he might go to minnesota even though he left without a contract

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DenverJetsFan View Post
                what do you think the actual chance is that we sign L.T? Im a huuge fan of this but you never know.. he might go to minnesota even though he left without a contract
                I am not in favor of it. I think he has lost more than 'a step'. last off season was supposed to be the year that he had his best offseason and was in the best shape of his life etc and he ended up having his worst year. Granted our O Line is better than SD's but we dont have the passing game they do at this point. How many times do you think the Chargers faced '8 men in the box'? My point is all factors should have led to a better year for LT, when it didnt happen it makes you think he is just in a fast decline.

                Don't get me wrong, he was a hall of fame back and possibly one of the best of all time, but I think we should pass.
                J. MESS

                Comment


                • I really like the Pool signing. He's young, talented, and inexpensive. Low risk, high reward transaction, also enabling us some more flexibility in the draft.
                  Ohio State Buckeyes Duke Blue Devils New York Jets St. Louis Cardinals San Jose Sharks Seattle Mariners

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by thetedginnshow View Post
                    I really like the Pool signing. He's young, talented, and inexpensive. Low risk, high reward transaction, also enabling us some more flexibility in the draft.
                    Really solid move, he didn't cost much at all. If he ends up starting I believe our starting safeties will cost less than 3.5 million. Think he could potentially excel in this system. I'd still be fine with drafting a safety and hope we do given his injury history and the fact that he's only on a 1 year deal, but not having to draft somebody to start this year is definitely nice.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by msolimani View Post
                      LT losing a step is better than the majority of RB's in the league
                      And he proved that to you last year right? Last year he was better then maybe a handful of starting RB's in the league, which involved teams like Houston and Seattle, other then that I'm not sure which majority RB's your referring to.


                      I don't think it be a bad signing for you guys at all, though I'd like it much more giving Shonn Greene 20 carries or so and a speed back in the draft to compliment him, LT doesn't really do that so I wouldn't see the point in over spending.


                      I just don't know where you came up with LT being better then a majority of RB's in the league after losing a step.





                      Originally posted by Scott Wright
                      I guarantee that if someone picks Cam Newton in the Top 5 they will regret it.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by LonghornsLegend View Post
                        And he proved that to you last year right? Last year he was better then maybe a handful of starting RB's in the league, which involved teams like Houston and Seattle, other then that I'm not sure which majority RB's your referring to.

                        I just don't know where you came up with LT being better then a majority of RB's in the league after losing a step.
                        I should've clarified. I meant whoever signs him would likely be signing him as a 2nd option and him losing a step is still way better than a lot of the 2nd RB's in the league. There must be something appealing about him if two of the best running teams in the league want him on board to complement their starters. Personally I think we made a mistake by letting go of Thomas Jones, but that's in the past so I think LT at the right price would be a perfect fit for a year or two.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by thetedginnshow View Post
                          I really like the Pool signing. He's young, talented, and inexpensive. Low risk, high reward transaction, also enabling us some more flexibility in the draft.
                          Yup...no downside here. If his concussions aren;t a factor he can be a huge contributor for us.
                          J. MESS

                          Comment


                          • Viking fan with a question for Jets fans. Does NY see Tomlinson as an upgrade over Thomas Jones? I'm just wondering why the Jets would let Jones walk at what seems like a reasonable price and then turn around and go after Tomlinson. Just looking for answer from somebody who would know a heck of a lot more about the Jets plans than I would. Thanks in advance guys.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by thetedginnshow View Post
                              Marlin Jackson signed with the Eagles.

                              And I wouldn't mind LT at all. However, at this phase of his career, I think he's about on par with Thomas Jones. So really, if we can't sign him for less than whatever we offered Jones, I don't see why we should bring him in. But they probably don't see it that way with name value and everything. I'd really rather find a more affordable option though (unless he is affordable and he's not getting a lot of love so far because he's trying to find a contender, and most contenders are either set at RB or don't like him). I think Betts or Fargas would really be just as good for what we need them for. That's just me though.
                              Well, that's what I said.

                              And this is what Tim Graham, the AFC East blogger for ESPN, said after me:

                              The New York Jets had success with a thirtysomething running back last year. They might be willing to give it another whirl.

                              ESPN's Adam Schefter reports free agent LaDainian Tomlinson will visit the Jets on Friday. Tomlinson, cut by the San Diego Chargers, will turn 31 in June and is coming off the worst season of his career.

                              Tomlinson met with the Minnesota Vikings on Thursday. There's a chance he could sign with the Vikings and cancel his Jets interview.

                              There's no way the Jets could use Tomlinson like they did Thomas Jones, a physical specimen who will turn 32 in August and was released last week for financial reasons. Jones was a workhorse last year, rushing for 1,402 yards and 14 touchdowns.

                              Tomlinson is worn out. In the Jets' backfield, he would be a complement to sophomore Shonn Greene, a rugged runner who showed in the playoffs he can be a featured back.

                              ESPN stats analyst KC Joyner sees Tomlinson as a valuable short-yardage specialist. The five-time Pro Bowler rushed 223 times for 730 yards and a 3.3-yard average per carry, all career-lows. But he rushed for 12 touchdowns, tying for fifth in the NFL.

                              For a story that analyzes the value of Tomlinson, Jones and Willie Parker in an attempt to project how much they have left, Joyner breaks down how each back fared when receiving good blocking (when every blocker won his point-of-attack assignment) versus bad blocking (at least one blocker losing his point-of-attack assignment).

                              Writes Joyner:
                              _____
                              Tomlinson had 14 carries last season when the Chargers were within 5 yards of the opponent's goal line and he was given acceptable blocking. Five of these came in Weeks 1 through 7, when Tomlinson was still struggling with his injuries, and he scored on only one of those plays.

                              That stands in stark contrast to his late-season performance in this area, when LT scored touchdowns on six of the eight good-blocking goal-line plays. He also scored a 6-yard touchdown on a rush play with good blocking against the Oakland Raiders in Week 8. If that were added in, Tomlinson would have seven touchdowns on nine carries of this nature down the stretch. Add in his 4-for-4 mark in converting on short-yardage (defined as third-down plays needing 3 or fewer yards) run plays with good blocking, and LT's conversion rate in this area moves to a very impressive 11 successes on 13 carries.
                              ____

                              The Jets have one of the NFL's top offensive lines, perhaps the best. They line up Pro Bowlers at center, left guard and left tackle.

                              Tomlinson, of course, can't expect to break the bank with the Jets. The Jets parted ways with a running back who rushed for nearly twice as many yards as Tomlinson did but was due a $3 million roster bonus and a $2.8 million base salary.

                              But if Tomlinson can handle serving as Greene's sidekick and accepts commensurate money, then the Jets can improve their backfield.
                              But who cares about that. OUR QUARTERBACK IS AWESOME




                              WHY WON'T THE PICTURE SHOW
                              Last edited by thetedginnshow; 03-12-2010, 05:50 PM.
                              Ohio State Buckeyes Duke Blue Devils New York Jets St. Louis Cardinals San Jose Sharks Seattle Mariners

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by hagy34 View Post
                                . Does NY see Tomlinson as an upgrade over Thomas Jones?
                                NO. LT would be a #3 RB and get a few carries here and there. We let TJ go because Shonn Greene is going to be the feature back.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X

                                Debug Information