Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Vick and Ndamukong Suh

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael Vick and Ndamukong Suh

    That's what I think.

    -Dome
    -Rookie QB likely means more losing in the upcoming season
    -Decent running-game, OL should be improved, he adds another dimension
    -WRs aren't exactly stars, would work better with a dual-threat/improviser/super hero QB than deer-in-headlight rookie

    Thoughts?
    "I'm Ko Simpson!"

    - Ko Simpson

  • #2
    Vick for Gibson?
    .......

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Todd Bertuzzi View Post
      Vick for Gibson?
      He is due some crazy roster bonus and in all likelihood will be an UFA I believe.
      "I'm Ko Simpson!"

      - Ko Simpson

      Comment


      • #4
        Haha yeah I know I was just messing with you.
        .......

        Comment


        • #5
          Not a fan of signing Vick.

          Comment


          • #6
            Vick really?

            The dude was a horrible passer when he was in Atlanta. He has an average CMP% of 57%, and that was before he missed two years. What is so intriguing about that? Has There been one receiver that's had success with Vick throwing him the ball?

            Not thanks. I know it's a big name and people are intrigued, but no.

            Comment


            • #7
              I've speculated in the Lions thread that the Rams should do this. I really hope it doesn't happen, but Vick + Suh>Bradford/Clausen

              Comment


              • #8
                Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bhaarat316 View Post
                  Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.
                  God I hope not.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.
                    .......

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).
                      save Freeman

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Me Likey Rookies View Post
                        Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).
                        The goal is to win. If the Rams don't end up signing Vick, I don't think "because he could win us more games and we could lose out on a QB next year" would be the reason.
                        Last edited by holt_bruce81; 02-20-2010, 09:15 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Not a Rams fan but like Raheem Morris, I think Spags is going to get the player that best improves the Ram's chances this COMING season. He is coaching for his job now.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm coming to yo team to win da Supa Bowl IMMEDIATELY!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Todd Bertuzzi View Post
                              In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.
                              In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows that the Eagles completely misused him.

                              RIP ST

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information