Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trade for Derrick Burgess???

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trade for Derrick Burgess???

    As per PFT; 'According to ESPN, WEEI.com, and the Boston Globe, the Patriots are interested in sending a 2010 draft pick to the Raiders for defensive end Derrick Burgess.

    The Pats reportedly would be willing to send a second-round pick or a third-round pick to Oakland for Burgess.'

    I have to be honest I did not see this coming at all. Here's a guy who had 27 sacks in two years('05 and '06) not too long ago. Would obviously upgrade the pass rushing situation but how would he cope in coverage? Another couple of worrying facts about this move is he is 30 and will be 31 before the playoffs and he hasn't played a whole season in three years.

    If this does go through I would hope at most it would be a third from next year and the last time the Patriots traded a draft pick for a Raider it worked out OK. What are your thoughts on this potential move?


    BoneKrusher killing it with the sig

  • #2
    It's one of those risk/reward things. If he regains the form he had a few years ago the reward could be high. How high the risk is, of course, depends on what they give up for him. I'd be interested in bringing him in but I don't know if I'd want to give up anything more than a third or fourth.

    A couple other things working against him in addition to what you mentioned are that he has never (to my knowledge) played OLB, and he is on the last year of his contract so you either only get him for one year or you have to extend his contract while you have plenty of other guys on the roster already that you need to extend.

    I wouldn't mind trading for him if they can get him cheap, both in money and in what they give up in the trade. I'm not so sure though that I want to see an older guy come in that will only be here and be effective for a year or two and who will slow down the development of Crable and Redd. I think I'd rather trade for a younger guy like Parys Haralson or Kamerion Wimbley (if a trade with Mangini is even possible), or someone like that who is young and has a lot of potential though they may not quite have performed up to that level yet.
    **
    2012 Patriots Anti-Draft

    1 - Anyone but Shea McClellin, Derek Wolfe, Peter Konz, Kendall Reyes, Harrison Smith, Whitney Mercilus or a RB

    2 Anyone but McClellin, Wolfe, Doug Martin or an OT

    3 Anyone but Wolfe

    **

    Comment


    • #3
      We have a lot of question marks in our pass rush and Burgess can get to the QB, plus Jason Taylor is on the Phins again so it makes sense it that regard. We have a lot of unproven young talent at OLB, and adding a veteran who has proven he can get to the QB would definitely be a good move. However, Burgess has played with his hand down during his career and it could be a tough transition this late in his career but I think it could be done; Burgess is a solid athlete and pass rusher. Plus he is a former Rebel!

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't get it. He's 6'2 260 (According to the Boston.com article I read)
        Wasn't BB's excuse for not drafting an OLB was their height? No 6'4-6'5 players. They were too short?
        Isn't that what he said?

        At 30+, I don't like the idea of bringing in someone who's never played in the 34.
        He would upgrade our pass rush but only in obvious passing downs.
        Would Woods play 1st and 2nd and Burgess on 3rd and long?

        It better not be anything more then a 3rd. Even that seems to much for a 30+ who has been fighting injuries recently
        -Boston Red Sox-New England Patriots-Boston Celtics-

        Comment


        • #5
          I would like for us to add Burgess, but as Nalej said I wouldn't be happy if we gave up anything more than a third rounder. He is a talented pass rusher and I think he has the ability to play in a 3-4, but it would definitely be a risk trading for Burgess. We all knew we needed to add a pass rusher before the draft and we failed to do so, I think adding Burgess would be a wise move if the price is not too steep.

          Comment


          • #6
            It might not hurt the development of Crable, Redd, etc. but rather it could help them. Bringing in a veteran to teach them some of the nuances of pass rushing can be a great addition...at the right price. No more than a 3rd rounder next year, and I think that he could be capable of transitioning to OLB with a heavy emphasis on rushing the QB, just like Colvin did in his time here.
            Patriots, Red Sox, Celtics, Bruins, Texas Longhorns

            Comment


            • #7
              Honestly I think this is going to end up being a bad trade if a second-round pick is involved. I have serious doubts that the best linebacker they could get this year with a second round pick is Derrick Burgess, another old, injury prone guy. If they wanted linebackers with durability issues and sharply declining production, they should have made a better effort to sign Jason Taylor. I'd rather blow Miami's offer ($1.1 million) out of the water than give up a second-round pick (which, if used right, comes out to being a young starter) for a guy who'll be ineffective in a year or two if he even has anything left at this point.

              It's true that New England's pass rush is looking very questionable (to be optimistic), but vastly overpaying for someone they wouldn't have needed if they had invested one of FOUR second round picks in a linebacker this year is not the answer. I don't understand how a team with a gaping hole at linebacker passes on Rey Maualuga, Clay Matthews, Clint Sintim, Everette Brown, etc. I'm going to be extremely disappointed with New England's draft to say the least if those players end up panning out for the teams that drafted them and the Patriots' linebackers are exposed this year.

              Comment


              • #8
                yes i def would not be a happy fan is we traded for him.

                Thanks to BoneKrusher for this amazing sig!

                Go Gators/Pats/Celts/Red Sox!

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think he could be a nice pickup for us, but again it all depends on the cost. I wouldn't be a happy fan either if we gave up a second rounder for him but I don't think we would even consider giving up anything more than a fourth for him. If we could get Burgess for a fourth I would be very happy since we would have another body at LB and one who is an established albeit declining veteran pass rusher.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Per Mike Lombardi:

                    "The trade rumors about Oakland Raiders defensive end Derrick Burgess are real. So real, in fact, the Raiders asked the Patriots for their second-round pick this year, Sebastian Vollmer, and back-up quarterback Kevin O’Connell in exchange for Burgess."

                    Wow. A second round pick and people who just got picked in the second and third rounds? I don't think so. Vollmer and O'Connell graded out more as 4th-5th round picks but there's no way that trade goes down. I wouldn't even trade a second rounder, and probably not a third. Fourth round would be nice. I would have rather had Burgess than Vollmer with the #58 pick, but no one drafts someone and trades them a month later. That's ridiculous.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Wow no way would I make that trade. The Patriots have a track record of making good QBs out of relaitve unknowns so I have quite high expectations for O'Connel who has way better physical tools than both Brady and Cassell. Plus Vollmer's upside is very high and could turn out to be a great player. Obviously these are simple projections at the minute but it's not like Burgess is an all-pro or anything


                      BoneKrusher killing it with the sig

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I guess I could live with a 2nd for Burgess but only because we have 3 2nds next year, although I would much prefer a 3rd.

                        And ya, that trade is just ridiculous.
                        Patriots, Red Sox, Celtics, Bruins, Texas Longhorns

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by RavenOfProphecy View Post
                          Per Mike Lombardi:

                          "The trade rumors about Oakland Raiders defensive end Derrick Burgess are real. So real, in fact, the Raiders asked the Patriots for their second-round pick this year, Sebastian Vollmer, and back-up quarterback Kevin O’Connell in exchange for Burgess."
                          What the hell? I know we probably shot that proposal down quickly but did the Raiders really think we would give up two young guys that we have obviously just invested a lot in? That is just a weird proposal, Al Davis and the Raiders-you are crazy.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Don Vito View Post
                            What the hell? I know we probably shot that proposal down quickly but did the Raiders really think we would give up two young guys that we have obviously just invested a lot in? That is just a weird proposal, Al Davis and the Raiders-you are crazy.
                            Like I said, if I had the choice between drafting Sebastian Vollmer or trading for Derrick Burgess with the #58 pick, I'd take Burgess. I would also take Burgess over Kevin O'Connell. I might even take Burgess over our second round pick in next year's draft, only because the Patriots have a big weakness with their pass rush, and I wouldn't be surprised if their defense cost them another Super Bowl. But the combination of the three is a definite no-go. I think the Raiders are just scared of trading with the Patriots after they traded Randy Moss for (I believe) John Bowie.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I agree with you and I know we have a glaring weakness in the pass rush, but you very rarely see teams give up on players that they invested a lot in before they even get a shot. O'Connell was a rookie last year and we just drafted Vollmer in the second, for all we know those guys could end up being All-Pros. I just think it would make more sense to ask for a 2010 second rounder then asking for a player a team drafted with a second round pick a month ago. Obviously the Pats saw something they liked in both O'Connell and Vollmer because we took them both a lot higher than most draftniks had them pegged to go.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information