Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sampras vs. Federer

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sampras vs. Federer

    Who would win? Take Pete Sampras when he was in his prime and Federer as of now. I'll take Sampras by a hair. Federer is an awful lot more consistent, but Sampras was just unearthly when he was on.

    Projected win total: 55+

  • #2
    Fed unless he's on clay court

    Sig by Darnik44two

    Lord Favre Is Immortal

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't really have an answer for this, but congrats to Sampras on his HOF induction. These are two guys that almost made me watch tennis. I'd say it goes 5 sets, with Sampras winning the tiebreaker 88-86

      Comment


      • #4
        If sampras plays his absolute best vs federer he wins. But say it is a best of ten, I think Federer would take it provided it wasnt on clay.
        When I eat, it is the food that is scared.

        Comment


        • #5
          Federer has a ways to go before he has done what Sampras has done

          Comment


          • #6
            Sampras his power and speed would beat Federer but it would be close. Federer is one of the greatest ever but a lot of his dominance is because he has never had a rival unlike Sampras.

            Sig By:The Dynasty

            2 7 Round Mocks: April 20
            http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/...50#post2577350
            Full NBA Mock Draft: Updated May 18
            http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/...=1#post2602966

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ghettosermon
              Sampras his power and speed would beat Federer but it would be close. Federer is one of the greatest ever but a lot of his dominance is because he has never had a rival unlike Sampras.

              Isn't Nadal his rival?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by yo123
                Originally posted by Ghettosermon
                Sampras his power and speed would beat Federer but it would be close. Federer is one of the greatest ever but a lot of his dominance is because he has never had a rival unlike Sampras.

                Isn't Nadal his rival?
                He's the one that has a chance againist him, but Federer still beats him most of the time.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Fed is the greatest of all time.


                  PM me for sig requests
                  Originally posted by Sean Connery
                  Suck it Trebek!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by stillaraiderfan
                    Originally posted by yo123
                    Originally posted by Ghettosermon
                    Sampras his power and speed would beat Federer but it would be close. Federer is one of the greatest ever but a lot of his dominance is because he has never had a rival unlike Sampras.

                    Isn't Nadal his rival?
                    He's the one that has a chance againist him, but Federer still beats him most of the time.
                    Beating your rivals is what makes you great

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by 24cadillac24
                      Originally posted by stillaraiderfan
                      Originally posted by yo123
                      Originally posted by Ghettosermon
                      Sampras his power and speed would beat Federer but it would be close. Federer is one of the greatest ever but a lot of his dominance is because he has never had a rival unlike Sampras.

                      Isn't Nadal his rival?
                      He's the one that has a chance againist him, but Federer still beats him most of the time.
                      Beating your rivals is what makes you great
                      nadal can only beat him on clay

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Roddick would own all.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by jayceheathman
                          Roddick would own all.
                          no


                          PM me for sig requests
                          Originally posted by Sean Connery
                          Suck it Trebek!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tobzilla
                            Originally posted by jayceheathman
                            Roddick would own all.
                            no
                            yes

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Thanks for posting this thread i was just talking about it.

                              I definitely take Sampras over Fed because of the competition Sampras had to face to get where hes at. Fed is good but the competition he faces doesnt even compare to what Sampras had to go through. Sampras had to compete with the other top 3 American tennis players which were Agassi, Courier, and Chang. On top of that he also had to play the likes of Rafter, Becker, and Kafelnikov all in their prime.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information