If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This whole thing is completely dumb based upon the seedings like a previous poster noted. How In Living Color ended up with the #1 seed is ridiculous. It's not even a Sit Com, its a Sketch Comedy show. And if we're looking at the entirety of the show, if one Sketch Comedy show deserved to make it it would be SNL (The early years were priceless).
I think there should possibly be a little better seeding as well...When you look at the list you have some really good shows against each other and then some really bad shows against each other.
For Instance...King of Queens is getting beat by Arrested Development. However King of Queens would beat Alf, Golden Girls, 3's Company, Married With Children, In Living Color. Same Goes For Coach or Frasier...both a tough paring that would destroy the other competition.
Well, the problem arises in the first thread. I can understand that this thread's seeding is based previous voting, which is fine. However, the first thread's setup was extremely flawed. Those matchups were just arbitrarily thrown together, and a show like In Living Color got put up against The Carroll Burnett show, so of course everyone was going to vote for it and it will get like 99% of the votes.
Posters should have sent in their top 10 sitcoms, with corresponding points based on how many times a show was 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. Then used point totals to determine seedings.