Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   Pro Football (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   Dual Runningbacks? the way to go? (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1284)

jkpigskin 01-17-2007 01:30 PM

Dual Runningbacks? the way to go?
 
interesting thing i noticed that all 4 teams left run with 2 runningbacks that both play a good amount of time

addai/rhodes
dillen/maroney
jones/benson
mcalister/bush


i saw it work to perfection against the ravens..... addai started the game and played the 1st 3 quarters..... then when they needed to kill time, they brought in the veteran rhodes who was fresh and he got some key first downs......

is this a start of a trend maybe? because surley it has worked

anyway i wanted to post this but never did, but then i found an article that talks about this

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns

devinhester=R.O.Y 2006 01-17-2007 01:42 PM

I have really started to favor the 2 back system. I love what New England, Chicago, Indy, and New Orleans have done with the two backs. It seems as if the backs are fresher and less beat up on as the season goes on as their carries are lessened with the two back system. I think the key to the two back system is the fact that all four of the teams that are left have a vertern running back, and a rookie back with the exception of Benson in Chicago.

New England - Dillion (12 years)/ Maroney (Rookie)
Indianapolis - Rhodes (6 years)/ Addai (Rookie)
New Orleans - McAllister (6 years)/ Bush (Rookie)
Chicago - Jones (7 years)/ Benson (2 years)

I am definetly in favor of the two back system.

jkpigskin 01-17-2007 01:44 PM

almost forgot that last year, the steelers had a semi combo running tandem of the bus and parker..... and they won the superbowl........

but like you implied... it works better if you have a veteran who can hold onto the ball and a talented young back

255979119 01-17-2007 01:44 PM

New England uses a 3 back system :)

thule 01-17-2007 01:49 PM

Well look at the NFL rushing stats

At the top of the NFL we have
  • Atlanta
    San Diego
    Jacksonville
    Washington
    Tennessee

At the bottom of the nfl we have
  • Detroit
    Cleveland
    Arizona
    Oakland
    Tampa Bay

I would say the 2 back system is good. However if you have a chance to get an elite back like LT or LJ then you have to take him and don't worry about it.

TheChampIsHere 01-17-2007 04:54 PM

Well you dont necessarily have to use a 2 back system where you have 2 backs of equal ability that get equal PT, but its very important to have a good backup at HB. Even if you have a pro-bowler at HB, its still important. Look at how effective Turner was behind LT this year.

Eaglez.Fan 01-17-2007 05:10 PM

I'd take guys like LT, LJ, Tiki, Westbrook or any star RB anyday over a 2 back system

rainbeaukid2 01-17-2007 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eaglez.Fan
I'd take guys like LT, LJ, Tiki, Westbrook or any star RB anyday over a 2 back system

i wouldnt, i would take maroney and dillon over those guys, maybe with the exception of LT

ElectricEye 01-17-2007 05:19 PM

Well, its the trend right now. But it has yet to prove if it has staying power or not. I have yet to see the two back system effect the wins and losses of a team.
I suppose it depends on your personel. If you have an LT, LJ, or a guy of that stature, then I don't want to see them split carries. That would be stupid. If you have a few good guys and want to get the most from both, then the two back system would probably be the way to go.

MaxV 01-17-2007 05:19 PM

The 2-back thing has been ok for Indy, but I believe the Colts' O is at its best when they have 1 feature RB.

That makes that play-action a more dangerous weapon.

Marion Barber III 24 01-17-2007 05:24 PM

No love for MBIII and JJ :(

Splat 01-17-2007 05:28 PM

When the Chiefs had both LJ and Priest it was not even fair for the other team.

PalmerToCJ 01-17-2007 05:47 PM

Rudi Johnson/Chris Perry is a sweet combo... Too bad Perry is never healthy.

jkpigskin 01-17-2007 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marion Barber III 24
No love for MBIII and JJ :(

i was just mentioning teams that were in the championship round...... barber and jones make a great duo as well as jones-drew and taylor

Shiver 01-17-2007 06:22 PM

It is the 'ideal' situation. If you can, you do a rotation.

keylime_5 01-17-2007 06:22 PM

It's not like San Diego and Kansas City don't have great backup RBs. Michael Turner is a future pro bowler and Michael Bennett is a starter quality RB (injuries denied that though).

LT/Turner and LJ/Bennett are both way better than Dillon/Maroney or McAllister/Bush. It's not like LJ and LT are the only backs on their teams, they share some carries (albeit not as much as in NE or NO)

Eaglez.Fan 01-17-2007 06:29 PM

Bennett did nothing when given a shot at starting in Minny. The only tihng he has proven is track speed. He hasn't proven anything in the run game.

JT Jag 01-17-2007 06:31 PM

The Jaguars had a great two-back set this year.

Fred Taylor was the undisputed starter, but he was spelled by Drew, a guy who could be a undisputed starter in the right offense (The West Coast Offense to be precise--- one that gives him enough touches, but doesn't overuse him in the running game while honing on his receiving talent) in his own right.

Young Nasty Man 01-17-2007 06:36 PM

Better for the Team. Keeps guys healthier. Fresh Legs more often....

I think im going with the two back tandem. But if I got LT he'll touch the ball 25 times a game atleast....

AZ9er 01-17-2007 06:57 PM

I like marion barber III and JJ

Caddy 01-17-2007 07:00 PM

I like Caddy and Michael Pittman :wink:

ks_perfection 01-17-2007 07:04 PM

Quote:

addai/rhodes
dillen/maroney
jones/benson
mcalister/bush
With the top 3 rhodes, maroney and benson weren't drafted to do a rotation but soon be the sole starter. In a couple of years all of those will be the starter and I doubt we'll see a balanced rotation, excluding Bush.

I think its important to have some kind of rotation, even if its very uneven like 3-1 or 4-1 so you don't end up with LJ running to death.

Gribble 01-17-2007 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ks_perfection
Quote:

addai/rhodes
dillen/maroney
jones/benson
mcalister/bush
With the top 3 rhodes, maroney and benson weren't drafted to do a rotation but soon be the sole starter. In a couple of years all of those will be the starter and I doubt we'll see a balanced rotation, excluding Bush.

I think its important to have some kind of rotation, even if its very uneven like 3-1 or 4-1 so you don't end up with LJ running to death.

Like that would happen...

Wait...

WildDude 01-17-2007 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PalmerToCJ
Rudi Johnson/Chris Perry is a sweet combo... Too bad Perry is never healthy.

i thought he just didnt play

jkpigskin 01-17-2007 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildDude
Quote:

Originally Posted by PalmerToCJ
Rudi Johnson/Chris Perry is a sweet combo... Too bad Perry is never healthy.

i thought he just didnt play

perry is a real good pass catcher........ he deserves a shot to start somewhere


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.