Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   St. Louis Rams Team Forum (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Michael Vick and Ndamukong Suh (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=37638)

gpngc 01-04-2010 10:36 PM

Michael Vick and Ndamukong Suh
 
That's what I think.

-Dome
-Rookie QB likely means more losing in the upcoming season
-Decent running-game, OL should be improved, he adds another dimension
-WRs aren't exactly stars, would work better with a dual-threat/improviser/super hero QB than deer-in-headlight rookie

Thoughts?

Todd Bertuzzi 01-04-2010 10:38 PM

Vick for Gibson?

gpngc 01-04-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd Bertuzzi (Post 1952966)
Vick for Gibson?

He is due some crazy roster bonus and in all likelihood will be an UFA I believe.

Todd Bertuzzi 01-04-2010 10:40 PM

Haha yeah I know I was just messing with you.

NGSeiler 01-05-2010 01:03 AM

Not a fan of signing Vick.

holt_bruce81 01-05-2010 05:31 AM

Vick really?

The dude was a horrible passer when he was in Atlanta. He has an average CMP% of 57%, and that was before he missed two years. What is so intriguing about that? Has There been one receiver that's had success with Vick throwing him the ball?

Not thanks. I know it's a big name and people are intrigued, but no.

Scotty D 01-05-2010 05:38 AM

I've speculated in the Lions thread that the Rams should do this. I really hope it doesn't happen, but Vick + Suh>Bradford/Clausen

brat316 01-05-2010 06:01 AM

Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.

holt_bruce81 01-05-2010 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhaarat316 (Post 1953534)
Rams will take Clausen when all is said in done. Bank on it.

God I hope not.

Todd Bertuzzi 01-05-2010 06:08 PM

In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.

Me Likey Rookies 02-20-2010 06:27 PM

Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).

holt_bruce81 02-20-2010 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Me Likey Rookies (Post 2024953)
Vick might be flashy for a year but Bradford/Clausen would obviously be the way to go longterm. Keep in mind that with Vick, they would probably win enough games to miss out on Locker/Mallet next year (assuming those 2 dont pull a Snead).

The goal is to win. If the Rams don't end up signing Vick, I don't think "because he could win us more games and we could lose out on a QB next year" would be the reason.

George Lippard 02-20-2010 09:32 PM

Not a Rams fan but like Raheem Morris, I think Spags is going to get the player that best improves the Ram's chances this COMING season. He is coaching for his job now.

MikeVickTheSickest 02-22-2010 02:49 AM

I'm coming to yo team to win da Supa Bowl IMMEDIATELY!

Shahin 02-24-2010 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd Bertuzzi (Post 1954271)
In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows his days as a starter are over.

In all seriousness, anyone who watched Vick this year knows that the Eagles completely misused him.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.