Draft Countdown Forums

Draft Countdown Forums (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/index.php)
-   Pro Football (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   DC Posters will get a look at good scheme vs bad scheme Saturday night (http://www.draftcountdown.com/forum/showthread.php?t=55198)

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:20 PM

DC Posters will get a look at good scheme vs bad scheme Saturday night
 
A vast majority of the paint chip eating dolts on here don't seem to think offensive scheme/QB play plays a role in production.

Saturday night, the GB Packers, who happen to have a brilliantly designed offense with a top 3 QB, will be facing the 49ers, who have one of the worst designed offenses in football with a talented, yet inexperienced and raw young Quarterback.

Pay attention to the formation groupings in this one. You will see the Packers spread it out wide and often, to get favorable matchups with guys like Randall Cobb and James Jones.

You will see the 49ers trot out a bunch of boring, base pistol formations, and see them flounder to come up with a way to move the ball through the air because they're sending fullbacks and halfbacks on patterns rather than wide receivers. You will also see some jumbo formations, that really do nothing to help the running game.

I can see it now; The Packer receivers are so GREAT! They won a lot of matchups against weaker nickel/dime corners and linebackers! Look at the STATZ they put up! They also threw the ball 45 times!

The 49er receivers suck! They didn't produce out of their boring 1 WR offensive sets! They threw the ball 24 times, why couldn't dey match the packer receivers PRODUCTIONZZZZ?????

This may be beating a dead horse, but this is as good a time as any for some of you to learn what I am talking about. Total stats in a vacuum are worthless when grading a player's worth.

For example, the best wide receiver on the field for this game is Michael Crabtree, and it's really not that close, but it's pretty much a guarantee one of their 4 receivers is going to have a better statistical day than him due to QB/design on offense. Vernon Davis is easily the best TE on any of these 2 teams, but it really wouldn't surprise me either to see Jeremichael Finley have a better day.

A Rodg and Mike McCarthy. A lethal combination that's going to take Kaepernick/Roman to school.

ImBrotherCain 01-10-2013 03:23 PM

EDIT: Never mind.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImBrotherCain (Post 3240491)
Argh... Another poster who gives Packer fans a bad name.

I'm a 49er fan you twat.

ImBrotherCain 01-10-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240493)
I'm a 49er fan you twat.

Yeah I realized that about 30 seconds after I posted when I reread the original post. Hence the edit.

Nice job attacking someone for a minor error. That is how you get your point across.

SuperPacker 01-10-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240487)
For example, the best wide receiver on the field for this game is Michael Crabtree, and it's really not that close, but it's pretty much a guarantee one of their 4 receivers is going to have a better statistical day than him due to QB/design on offense. Vernon Davis is easily the best TE on any of these 2 teams, but it really wouldn't surprise me either to see Jeremichael Finley have a better day.

This is where your trolling has gone too far.

vidae 01-10-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240493)
I'm a 49er fan you twat.

That definitely doesn't help your case round these here parts.

jrdrylie 01-10-2013 03:30 PM

Just another terrible 49er fan around these parts.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperPacker (Post 3240501)
This is where your trolling has gone too far.

And why's that? Vernon Davis is a nobody in this crap-tastic offense. Hardly trolling at all and I doubt you'll say much when it turns out to be true.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae (Post 3240502)
That definitely doesn't help your case round these here parts.

At this point, I don't really care, because the doofus tried to call me on homerism instead of challenge my points(and then made a laughable error in deciding which team I'm a "homer" for).

You talk football with me, I will talk football. You start acting like a little girl and crying about homerism, or "trolllingzzz", I will return the favor with off topic nonsense.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrdrylie (Post 3240506)
Just another terrible 49er fan around these parts.

There are certainly a lot of terrible 49er fans on here, but I don't happen to be one of them.

ImBrotherCain 01-10-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240511)
At this point, I don't really care, because the doofus tried to call me on homerism instead of challenge my points(and then made a laughable error in deciding which team I'm a "homer" for).

You talk football with me, I will talk football. You start acting like a little girl and crying about homerism, or "trolllingzzz", I will return the favor with off topic nonsense.

But you are a homer... and you are a troll. I apologize for my mistake but the general point still stands.

bigbluedefense 01-10-2013 03:37 PM

You're an idiot. A complete idiot.

Brodeur 01-10-2013 03:38 PM

Ness, you didn't need to create another account to make yourself look better.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImBrotherCain (Post 3240513)
But you are a homer... and you are a troll. I apologize for my mistake but the general point still stands.

You're not really in a position to call me a homer when you couldn't figure out which team I root for. I mean, at first you think I'm Packer homer, and now all of a sudden I'm 49er homer? Explain how that one works, genius.

The only troll in this thread is you, who decided to respond with a non-football point.

SuperPacker 01-10-2013 03:39 PM

I love it when trolls pretend to be upset by other people trolling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur (Post 3240516)
Ness, you didn't need to create another account to make yourself look better.

Dammit Brody you're making me spit out my spaghetti!

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbluedefense (Post 3240514)
You're an idiot. A complete idiot.

If that's the case, what does that make the rest of the posters here? Mentally ********?

Saints-Tigers 01-10-2013 03:40 PM

Me and Ne don't really get along, but I'd be shocked if this were Ness. Ness loves to use his own profile to make asinine statements ;)

Anyway, to actually respond to this, I think you're underestimating how much more you can do with someone like Rodgers.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur (Post 3240516)
Ness, you didn't need to create another account to make yourself look better.

Ness? Dude is useless.

First I'm a packer homer, now I'm Ness. Hahahahahahaha. Good god you guys are ****** slow.

bigbluedefense 01-10-2013 03:42 PM

It's amazing how great the playcalling looks when you have a good quarterback.

One team has an elite quarterback the other team doesn't. Doesn't take a genius to understand why the plays look so much better when a good quarterback is throwing the ball.

ImBrotherCain 01-10-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240517)
You're not really in a position to call me a homer when you couldn't figure out which team I root for. I mean, at first you think I'm Packer homer, and now all of a sudden I'm 49er homer? Explain how that one works, genius.

The only troll in this thread is you, who decided to respond with a non-football point.

I actually realized you were a 49er homer as soon as you started talking about Crabtree. Seeing as I called you a homer and a troll in your last thread attempting to explain how Welker sucks and Crabtree is a god. Again I am sorry I skimmed through the drivel you call "football talk".

jrdrylie 01-10-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypocrisyIsGreat (Post 3240507)
And why's that? Vernon Davis is a nobody in this crap-tastic offense. Hardly trolling at all and I doubt you'll say much when it turns out to be true.

The craptastic 49ers offense actually gained more yards per game than the Packers despite facing slightly better defenses (averaged 15.25 vs. 15.875)

G Mobile 01-10-2013 03:44 PM

Bro, Jordyzzz > Crab.


For real though, I think people underrate how much GB super deep receiving core and consistency of the offensive system & personnel contribute to Rodgers success. Granted Rodgers is an elite player, but I don't see him separated from Brady/Manning/Brees in my book. That OL needs to protect him more though.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrdrylie (Post 3240524)
The craptastic 49ers offense actually gained more yards per game than the Packers despite facing slightly better defenses (averaged 15.25 vs. 15.875)

You might wanna re-check those numbers, Forrest.

vidae 01-10-2013 03:45 PM

Crabtree is basically awful.

HypocrisyIsGreat 01-10-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImBrotherCain (Post 3240523)
I actually realized you were a 49er homer as soon as you started talking about Crabtree. Seeing as I called you a homer and a troll in your last thread attempting to explain how Welker sucks and Crabtree is a god. Again I am sorry I skimmed through the drivel you call "football talk".

Uh huh. You've already made a fool of yourself in this thread, so really, it doesn't matter. Packer homer. 49er homer. Troll. Crabtree homer. Yaddddddaaaaaa.

If I was a 49er homer, I'd be calling for a win. I expect the Packers to embarrass us.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.