|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
06-13-2006, 10:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,013
Reputation: 23902
|
Bears fans- Benson vs Jones
Which do you pick to be our starter and why?
I pick Jones, he has shown so much heart last year, the Bears cannot let him rot on the bench. Start him and have him split carries with Benson like 18-15 or 20-20 depending on how much we run.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
06-13-2006, 11:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Thomas Jones is the better back but Benson is young and makes more money. The team will probably go with Benson not to waste all that money but I would go with Jones because he is better.
|
|
|
|
06-13-2006, 11:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Adrian Peterson owns them :twisted:
|
|
|
|
06-13-2006, 11:17 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 610
Reputation: 10
|
I would say Jones, he had a HUGE year last year and was the main reason on offense that da Beeeearsss won som many games last season. Not to mention they have a great D.
__________________

sig by BuckNaked contact him if you want it done right.
|
|
|
06-13-2006, 11:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: You would know about being more in tune if you were MORE IN TUNE
Posts: 21,242
Reputation: 3235868
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by theshark08
I would say Jones, he had a HUGE year last year and was the main reason on offense that da Beeeearsss won som many games last season. Not to mention they have a great D.
|
starting to seem eerily similar to Brees-Rivers
Nothing great was expected from the starting veteran, #4 overall pick held out, veteran had a great year. It would be odder if Jones started this year and was sourced out to make room for Benson next year, which could be very likely if Benson shows some stuff during his PT
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 12:22 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 89
Reputation: 11365
|
Thomas Jones. Case closed.
__________________
| Hawkeyes || Rams || Lakers || Braves || Avalanche |
TEAM Ronnie Radke.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 12:26 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,356
Reputation: 27250
|
I say Ceddy B because he has the motivation to grab hold of the starting spot and keep it, plus he's supposedly working very hard this offseason and not missing OTA's and stuff like TJ. Added on, there is the pressure of the organization to play the 4th overall pick who's making boatloads of money doing very little. He should be the man this year.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 12:47 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,430
Reputation: 8007
|
i think that they should split carries like priest and LJ.
__________________
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 12:52 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,356
Reputation: 27250
|
Quote:
|
i think that they should split carries like priest and LJ.
|
I think the Bears should try to incorperate them both in the same plays to mix things up a bit so that defenses won't know who's going to get the ball on a hand off, screen, etc.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 02:15 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 610
Reputation: 10
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by America
Quote:
|
i think that they should split carries like priest and LJ.
|
I think the Bears should try to incorperate them both in the same plays to mix things up a bit so that defenses won't know who's going to get the ball on a hand off, screen, etc.
|
it could work because their QB situation sucks, and Grossman is always hurt so if they run the ball 50 times a game and split them then they should both have pretty good stats but they still have muhammad so that won't work.
__________________

sig by BuckNaked contact him if you want it done right.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 02:23 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 127
Reputation: 10
|
I would say Jones, because he proved he can make the big plays. And he's a better receiver out of the backfield.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 02:07 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: W.P.B., FL
Posts: 1,011
Reputation: -42
|
Lets not forget that Jones was a top ten pick too thats finally living up to his potential. I would slowly incorporate him in. Like Ricky and Ronnie last year.
__________________

Big ups to jkpigskin for the sig.
|
|
|
06-14-2006, 02:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Z?
Posts: 2,114
Reputation: -1547
|
split the carries, TJ starts
__________________
sig by CalBears99
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yodachu
|
|
|
|
06-16-2006, 08:51 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Resident Alcoholic
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,990
Reputation: 2093479
|
its hard to compare them as backs, because they are so differant. IN benson, u have a tank of a RB, who can carry the load for the entire game and doesnt need to split carries. IN thomas jones, u havea guy who has put together one good season, and look at it realistically, he was the bears offense htey had NO passing attack at all. But jones is an effective reciever out ofthe backfield and is a good cutback runner. SO if i had my choice, i start benson and use jones as a 3rd down back, and trade him when the season is over.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Goosemahn
The APS is strong in this one.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killxswitch
Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.
|
|
|
|
06-16-2006, 09:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Ghettosermon
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pentagon City, VA
Posts: 22,382
Reputation: 455091
|
TJ, until he fails to produce he is the starter even if it means Benson is on the Bench for the next 5 years.
|
|
|
06-17-2006, 04:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hendersonville, VYisaGod
Posts: 9,142
Reputation: 121272
|
Jones
I hate Benson for some reason :twisted: :evil:
|
|
|
06-17-2006, 06:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Posts: 8,861
Reputation: 373070
|
Thomas Jones is the starter unless Benson does something special in camp.
__________________
|
|
|
06-17-2006, 08:50 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hendersonville, VYisaGod
Posts: 9,142
Reputation: 121272
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Go_Eagles77
Thomas Jones is the starter unless Benson does something special in camp.
|
Benson is working with the 1st team offense this offseason, Jones wants a new contract.
|
|
|
06-17-2006, 09:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
:/
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RAWR
Posts: 37,128
Reputation: 2171333
|
Benson is a stud and the workhouse pound it back the Bears need. I know Jones played really well last year, but Benson is going to be something special. They should have tried to ship Jones out so Peterson could get some more action.
__________________

<Gaius_Baltar> That is correct comahan
<vidae> I ******* LOVE YOU DG
<njx9> <3 dg
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 06:50 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,423
Reputation: 102758
|
Who would I pick as the starter? Easy. Thomas Jones.
Who do I think will be the starter? Harder. My guess is ... if Jones gets in on time, he'll be the starter.
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 12:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: :3
Posts: 17,552
Reputation: 466188
|
Quote:
|
split the carries, TJ starts
|
That sounds right. Maybe a 60-40 carry split between TJ and Benson respectively.
__________________

by BoneKrusher
Quote:
|
<TheUnseen> Drunken Canadian Bastard: There's an APS for that
|
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 01:50 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
#1 Vickscuser
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LakerLand
Posts: 13,133
Reputation: 628697
|
It's really difficult because using Benson in a committee approach is going to negate his effectiveness. He's a pounder who gets better as he gets more carries and the defense wears out. For this reason, I'd go with Benson, since he fits the mold the Bears are looking for on offense. I'd rotate Jones in on third downs.
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 02:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,828
Reputation: 1691
|
That's an awfully crowded backfield. They should have traded at least one of the three backs for a pick.
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 02:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 19,729
Reputation: 1306926
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
It's really difficult because using Benson in a committee approach is going to negate his effectiveness. He's a pounder who gets better as he gets more carries and the defense wears out. For this reason, I'd go with Benson, since he fits the mold the Bears are looking for on offense. I'd rotate Jones in on third downs.
|
Think about it though, if Benson is getting carries late in the game, but he's only had around 15 while Jones has had 20-25, the defense has seen 35-40 but Benson is still fresh from oonly having 15, thus making his pounding style even more effective later in the game.
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
06-18-2006, 02:41 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,828
Reputation: 1691
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nobodyinparticular
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yourfavestoner
It's really difficult because using Benson in a committee approach is going to negate his effectiveness. He's a pounder who gets better as he gets more carries and the defense wears out. For this reason, I'd go with Benson, since he fits the mold the Bears are looking for on offense. I'd rotate Jones in on third downs.
|
Think about it though, if Benson is getting carries late in the game, but he's only had around 15 while Jones has had 20-25, the defense has seen 35-40 but Benson is still fresh from oonly having 15, thus making his pounding style even more effective later in the game.
|
Running the ball that much will never happen in the NFL. 40 rushes a game?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.
|