|
|
| "DC" Scouting Reports See the Latest Scouting Report Additions! |
12-10-2012, 08:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Owner
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota (U.S.A.)
Posts: 11,354
Reputation: 1344983
|
Matt Barkley, QB, USC
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
12-10-2012, 08:38 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: You can call me Jooby Guverse
Posts: 23,965
Reputation: 5885092
|
Oh man, first scouting report of the year! It's draft season folks!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy
I want to be Vidae.
|
Quote:
<@vidae> Bomer is like an angel
<@DG> angels wish
|
Quote:
<@vidae> D:
<@comahan> D:
|
** RIP themaninblack. You will be missed. **
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 08:51 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 954
Reputation: 185499
|
Yay! He's back. Glad to see these reports up early. Barkley's a polarizing prospect for sure and athletic Dalton isnt a bad comparison. Also, Pro-Style experience isn't something I would call a positive. Lane Kiffin's bajillion bubble screen offense is much more spread derivative and I would say hurt Barkley a bit.
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2012, 09:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Owner
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota (U.S.A.)
Posts: 11,354
Reputation: 1344983
|
Initially my first thought for a comparison was Mark Sanchez but the more I thought about it Sanchez was more athletic and had more upside coming out. Not to mention it was a bit clichéd.
In my mind Barkley is a rich-man's Dalton and can similarly effective in a West Coast Offense.
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 07:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
TomTom Out
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the 28th state
Posts: 25,759
Reputation: 4078996
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
In my mind Barkley is a rich-man's Dalton and can similarly effective in a West Coast Offense.
|
What's his ideal landing spot, in your opinion, Scott?
__________________
Pick the Winners / '08: 171-96 (W) / '09: 177-90 / '10: 171-96 / '11: 183-84 (W) / '12: 173-94
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 08:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Owner
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota (U.S.A.)
Posts: 11,354
Reputation: 1344983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
What's his ideal landing spot, in your opinion, Scott?
|
I think Arizona would be a GREAT landing spot for Barkley. Good weather so the arm strength wouldn't be an issue like it would in say Buffalo, a relatively talented team with some weapons like Larry Fitzgerald, Michael Floyd, Beanie Wells / Ryan Williams, etc. Add Barkley to the equation and shore up the offensive line and the Cardinals would be cooking with gas.
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 08:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,538
Reputation: 306170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
I think Arizona would be a GREAT landing spot for Barkley. Good weather so the arm strength wouldn't be an issue like it would in say Buffalo, a relatively talented team with some weapons like Larry Fitzgerald, Michael Floyd, Beanie Wells / Ryan Williams, etc. Add Barkley to the equation and shore up the offensive line and the Cardinals would be cooking with gas.
|
This was my first thought as well after reading Brent's post. Ideally, I see them trading back into the end of the 1st or the top of the 2nd to get him. Or do you think they have to take him in the top 10, Scott?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJSchneider
If Te'o fell to us, I would wet my pants. If we then passed on him, I would poop said pants.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrdrylie
At your age, you'll probably poop and pee your paints on draft night regardless of whom the Saints Draft.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 09:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Owner
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota (U.S.A.)
Posts: 11,354
Reputation: 1344983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farfromforgotten
This was my first thought as well after reading Brent's post. Ideally, I see them trading back into the end of the 1st or the top of the 2nd to get him. Or do you think they have to take him in the top 10, Scott?
|
I think it will be a debate whether the Cardinals should go quarterback or offensive tackle in the Top 10. However, if Arizona feels like Matt Barkley or Geno Smith can be the guy they should pull the trigger and not play around. Just too important of a position to be looking for bargains.
|
|
|
12-12-2012, 10:07 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Athens, Ga.
Posts: 4,238
Reputation: 238074
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farfromforgotten
This was my first thought as well after reading Brent's post. Ideally, I see them trading back into the end of the 1st or the top of the 2nd to get him. Or do you think they have to take him in the top 10, Scott?
|
Everybody wants to trade back and still get the player they want...
If Barkley is good enough to be their franchise QB, why would he still be available in the late first/early second? It doesn't appear there will be other top QB prospects pushing him down the board. It also doesn't appear QBs will stop being high valued. If Arizona thinks he's their guy, they should probably just get take him with the first chance they get.
Or they could just make another typical Arizona top 10 pick, and pass on a QB for some premier athlete who won't be able to help the team overcome their lack of a QB.
__________________
What?
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 07:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In Wyoming with the Wolverines
Posts: 798
Reputation: 47135
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Initially my first thought for a comparison was Mark Sanchez but the more I thought about it Sanchez was more athletic and had more upside coming out. Not to mention it was a bit clichéd.
In my mind Barkley is a rich-man's Dalton and can similarly effective in a West Coast Offense.
|
andy dalton is better athlete than mark sanchez
mark sanchez is the best comparison to barkeley, he just more accurate than sanchez
__________________
Said Jones: I want to officially close the window to closing the window. That was off-season talk. I do feel a sense or urgency, though. … “I’ve been here 23 years. I’ve been here when it was glory hole days and when it wasn’t. I want me some glory hole!”
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 01:31 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 19,732
Reputation: 1306926
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
|
I have been waiting for this like a kid waits for Santa to come down the chimney.
Thank you Santa!!!
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 01:46 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,536
Reputation: 413954
|
his pocket presense and overall release/awareness reminds me of brees a lot
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saints-Tigers
"He won't be able to just use his arm power to throw defenders around at the next level!"
The hell he won't, lol.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 01:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 21
Reputation: 5189
|
I love this!! Been waiting all year for the 1st scouting report.

|
|
|
12-11-2012, 02:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: anaheim - home of the...ducks?
Posts: 9,923
Reputation: 286460
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 03:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 26
Reputation: 8268
|
So glad to see the 1st scouting report out of the year, it means draft is finally getting ready to pick up again. With that said I don't agree with the 1st round grade on Barkley he is a great clip board guy but I don't see anything that indicates he will be a good NFL starter. I see him as more of a 3rd round Jimmy Clausen type guy (without the attitude), very little upside in Barkley and he lacks the arm to make any wow throws. Andy Dalton comparison seems a bit off I see more of a Mark Brunell type career for Barkley. Very Capable of winning a few games as a back up but as a starter will leave a lot to be desired despite his high football IQ. However, that is just my opinion.
|
|
|
01-04-2013, 12:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,983
Reputation: 52107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorz319
So glad to see the 1st scouting report out of the year, it means draft is finally getting ready to pick up again. With that said I don't agree with the 1st round grade on Barkley he is a great clip board guy but I don't see anything that indicates he will be a good NFL starter. I see him as more of a 3rd round Jimmy Clausen type guy (without the attitude), very little upside in Barkley and he lacks the arm to make any wow throws. Andy Dalton comparison seems a bit off I see more of a Mark Brunell type career for Barkley. Very Capable of winning a few games as a back up but as a starter will leave a lot to be desired despite his high football IQ. However, that is just my opinion.
|
You know Mark Brunell was a damn good player when he was with the Jags, right? Plus, he ran a 4.6 40 and used every bit of it to his advantage early in his career. I don't think he's anything like Brunell was. He reminds me of Jimmy Clausen/Brodie Croyle and a best case scenario of Chad Pennington. He's a guy with an unimpressive frame and physical traits and manages the game well around his much more talented teammates. A right handed Matt Leinart with a better work ethic.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 07:16 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,668
Reputation: 151591
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorz319
I don't see anything that indicates he will be a good NFL starter. I see more of a Mark Brunell type career for Barkley. Very Capable of winning a few games as a back up but as a starter will leave a lot to be desired despite his high football IQ. However, that is just my opinion.
|
This doesn't follow logically.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 01:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 26
Reputation: 8268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unbiased
This doesn't follow logically.
|
I don't think it has a problem logically, Mark Brunell was an average at best starting QB who never excelled at anything, however as a back up QB he was the kind of guy teams love as their clip board QB because of his intelligence and understanding of the offense; however, this does not mean he will make a good full time QB. Matt Barkley reminds me a lot of Brunell its not an insult just my opinion.
Last edited by Warriorz319 : 01-16-2013 at 01:15 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 11:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sean Mannion Bandwagon
Posts: 3,390
Reputation: 301793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorz319
I don't think it has a problem logically, Mark Brunell was an average at best starting QB who never excelled at anything, however as a back up QB he was the kind of guy teams love as their clip board QB because of his intelligence and understanding of the offense; however, this does not mean he will make a good full time QB. Matt Barkley reminds me a lot of Brunell its not an insult just my opinion.
|
Barkley and Brunell are nothing alike. Brunell was a very mobile QB and a very good QB in the late 90s - early 00s. Barkley is a pure pocket passer with great polish and experience as a 4 year starter. I like Barkley and think he can be a good QB at the next level, I see him as a guy who can have a Matt Schaub type career.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 06:36 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 26
Reputation: 8268
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidGold
Barkley and Brunell are nothing alike. Brunell was a very mobile QB and a very good QB in the late 90s - early 00s. Barkley is a pure pocket passer with great polish and experience as a 4 year starter. I like Barkley and think he can be a good QB at the next level, I see him as a guy who can have a Matt Schaub type career.
|
I disagree that Brunell was a very good QB in the late 90's and early 2000's, Brunell was a solid serviceable QB. The Jaguars were a good football team because of a Great Running game led by Fred Taylor and an excellent Dom Capers defense, Brunell didn't hurt the team but he was not the reason they were putting up 10+ win seasons. As for the Comparison I am comparing the type of High Football IQ, led serviceable career that I believe that Barkley will have not a style of game comparison; That is why I say I think he will have a Brunell type of career, very solid and serviceable but not ever going to be a star. In my very first post I said his skill set was more like a Jimmy Clausen as they are/were both maxed out potentially as they enter/ed the NFL and are pocket passers with average arms, high intelligence and accuracy. Everyone seems stuck in the Brunell was a mobile QB thing, so perhaps I should have choose a different serviceable QB like Kyle Orton; however, I was comparing a caliber of career not playing style in the Brunell comparison perhaps I didn't make that clear.
|
|
|
12-13-2012, 03:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,077
Reputation: 255302
|
I think I'd send Cleveland a late round pick for Colt McCoy before I'd drop a 1 on this guy. Matter of fact, I'm sure of it.
__________________
Oakland's defense has "Third Downs Syndrome." Draft accordingly.
No offense, but your Raiders draft sucks.
|
|
|
12-15-2012, 05:48 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,159
Reputation: 209182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abaddon
I think I'd send Cleveland a late round pick for Colt McCoy before I'd drop a 1 on this guy. Matter of fact, I'm sure of it.
|
There's no need to disrespect Barkley like that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 49erNation85
I dunno even half of those guys why did we sign them jeez.
|
|
|
|
12-16-2012, 04:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The difference between a child's toy and an adult toy
Posts: 4,084
Reputation: 1556729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abaddon
I think I'd send Cleveland a late round pick for Colt McCoy before I'd drop a 1 on this guy. Matter of fact, I'm sure of it.
|
Those are weird words.
Colt McCoy has only proven that he's a solid backup quarterback and obviously hasn't shown anything special in practice to cause any controversy in Cleveland, where the starting quarterback is Brandon Weeden.
__________________
|
|
|
12-24-2012, 02:53 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,077
Reputation: 255302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalbears13
Those are weird words.
Colt McCoy has only proven that he's a solid backup quarterback and obviously hasn't shown anything special in practice to cause any controversy in Cleveland, where the starting quarterback is Brandon Weeden.
|
And yet he'd be a cheaper version of Barkley. I just don't see this guy as someone worthy of a high draft pick.
__________________
Oakland's defense has "Third Downs Syndrome." Draft accordingly.
No offense, but your Raiders draft sucks.
|
|
|
12-13-2012, 07:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
DC Administrator
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 54,525
Reputation: 1633167
|
Dallas should take him. They've got time to groom him.
People fretting too much about his size and arm strength.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.
|