Best Coaching Staff

neko4 · 05-09-2008, 01:53 PM

Ive gotta go McCarthy and Green Bay.
Took us from 4-12 to 8-8 to 13-3, and with relativly unknown players.

But McCarthy and Co needs to prove they can do it without brett, or even if we still had Brett, that last year was more than a one year wonder.

Crazy_Chris · 05-09-2008, 02:06 PM

I don't know about this one I agree with what you said about McCarthy and Co proving. Eh this one is a toughy I am just gonna go with the Pack by default.

neko4 · 05-09-2008, 02:11 PM

I think it comes down to mike and lovie.
Childress and Marrinelli could prove me wrong though.

umphrey · 05-09-2008, 03:34 PM

Childress and Marinelli are average coaches, that won't really improve much IMO.

Gotta go with NFC pro bowl coach and (I believe) #2 in coach of the year voting for McCarthy, though I have respect for Lovie.

bearfan · 05-09-2008, 06:01 PM

Went with the Pack because of what they have been doing. They have set systems, and they stick with it, where the Bears have hot-cold offenses where we will either be pass happy or have a balance. The Bears coaches dont scheme (Carolina playoffs 2005 season vs Steve Smith), they just keep the same system, and try to get better players.

Brothgar · 05-09-2008, 06:06 PM

I'm going with Rod he is slowly turning this team around.

regoob2 · 05-09-2008, 07:05 PM

I went with the Pack on this, I really like what they do.

asmitty45 · 05-09-2008, 08:54 PM

GB, mccarthy has done nothing but good since he got to GB so ill give it to him.

neko4 · 05-10-2008, 11:45 AM

Green Bay Wins!

johbur · 06-03-2008, 11:39 PM

Mike or Lovie. Lovie or Mike. Well, considering Lovie dragged the Bears to the Super Bowl with Rex Grossman at QB, I have to give it to him. Mike McCarthy used his force of will to bring Brett Favre to the best year he'd had this decade and was on the precipice of the Super Bowl, but I doidn't like him all bundled up in the cold. The Giants might have been a team on a mission, but with some better playcalling and a defensive adjustment, GB would have been i the SB, so Lovie gets my vote.

fondoffilm · 07-16-2008, 11:22 PM

Doesn't it say coaching staff, not head coach?

bearsfan_51 · 07-31-2008, 04:28 PM

Pfft....gimme a break. Mike McCarthy decided that he was going to throw the ball 800 times against the Giants, completely abandoning their run game, and essentially giving the game away.

Lovie Smith is 6-2 versus the Packers, 3-1 versus McCarthy. He has made a Superbowl. He has won the division twice. The fact that McCarthy is actually winning just shows how presentist everyone on this board is.

thule · 07-31-2008, 04:53 PM

Or the fact that the packers fan outnumber every other teams fans by a lot around here. :P

ChezPower4 · 08-01-2008, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fondoffilm

Doesn't it say coaching staff, not head coach?

What are you trying to say???

By the way your sig is ********

Gay Ork Wang · 08-01-2008, 04:42 PM

he meant that everyone is only talking about the HC and not about the OC or DC and so on

e.g. u only talk about Mike Tomlin but not Dick LeBeau

SFbear · 08-02-2008, 03:29 PM

If this is actually coaching staffs, Ron Turner should make us lose by default.

Kid_Ego · 04-09-2009, 05:48 PM

The Pack Had a running back this year?
The Vikings had receivers?
The Bears had anything besides Forte?
and The lions play speaks for itself
Why are we even asking this question? Im not sure youd have a coaching staff if you combined all 4 teams.
well maybe......
No prolly not

Brothgar · 04-09-2009, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broth223

I'm going with Rod he is slowly turning this team around.

FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bendert58 · 04-09-2009, 06:04 PM

Pretty weak division as a whole.

Kid_Ego · 04-11-2009, 03:00 PM

Honestly its hard to see an of these coaches at thees organizations 5 years from now. So I call it a draw